Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Southwest
Deadheading & Assigned Seating >

Deadheading & Assigned Seating

Search

Notices

Deadheading & Assigned Seating

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-16-2026 | 05:26 AM
  #91  
hoover's Avatar
At your mom's house
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,723
Likes: 488
From: cpt 737
Default

Originally Posted by RJSAviator76
They're referring to the travel document where they say NONREV travelers should sit behind the wing. You can find this document on swalife.

The word should means diddly squat to me on so many levels. First and foremost, until it says "shall", kindly eff off. 'Should' is a suggestion, 'shall' is a requirement. By default, the FA suggestion is noted and promptly rejected.

Second, if I'm deadheading, I'm working - I'm paid to be there, so yeah, I'm taking the best damn seat there is.

Going forward with assigned seating, this is gonna be interesting... middle seat regular seat? Highly uncomfortable for many and this level of discomfort could possibly lead to a fatigue call. I would imagine most people taller than 6'2" will find themselves cramped and uncomfortable in the middle seats in the back of the plane.
oh I know the document. I read it the same as you.
the problem is have is the amount of power the CSAs are going to wield.
My suggestion, and I've done this, works well, is to call NOC and have the CP contact the CSA's supervisor and have them deal with it. Takes about 2 min and you can stand there while they get the phone call.
there was a CSA in DEN that routinely wouldnt clear JS, JS not non rev, because she was waiting on final weights etc. Two times I called the NOC in front of her and now she just hands me the boarding pass without talking.
I don't argue, I dont plead my case. If im a DH and there's a problem and im not going home I miss the flight. If im on my own time i deal with their supervisor.
Reply
Old 01-16-2026 | 05:31 AM
  #92  
Mozam's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 1,578
Likes: 150
From: Left
Default

Originally Posted by MatthewAMEL
The DH debacle is 100% about revenue.

Someone finally sat down and took a look at the amount of DH'ing that happens around the system and realized how much revenue it was going to cost them. It's why they said you can BUY the premium seat. I just operated a DAL-DEN flight that had 22 DH crew members. That's 22 premium seats that don't go to paying pax and if a pax already paid, that's money that the company has to compensate.

Not our problem that the company didn't fully realize the cost of the 'premium seating' clause in the new CBA.

It kind of is our problem ,since the company does not view the contract the same way SWAPA does


2026 should be different though, bojo said employees come first . . ( Deep sarcasm for anyone who is not at SWA)
Reply
Old 01-16-2026 | 04:52 PM
  #93  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,002
Likes: 74
Default

Well..after reading the SWAPA email I see myself doing a whole bunch of "on scene leadership" right in the critical few minutes before push. I won't be letting the door close until the jumpseaters are figured out and will not be putting JS in a position to get written up by FAs.
Reply
Old 01-16-2026 | 05:11 PM
  #94  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Mar 2024
Posts: 147
Likes: 44
Default

I found that email very confusing regarding jumpseating
Reply
Old 01-16-2026 | 05:35 PM
  #95  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,002
Likes: 74
Default

Originally Posted by Fly90
I found that email very confusing regarding jumpseating
Exactly, SWA making easy hard for 50 years.

Can't we just do it the way everyone else does?
Reply
Old 01-16-2026 | 06:18 PM
  #96  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Apr 2022
Posts: 32
Likes: 7
Default

Originally Posted by Proximity
Exactly, SWA making easy hard for 50 years.

Can't we just do it the way everyone else does?
At this point, the only conclusion I can draw is that most of this is intentional. Like Jody said, the company misses virtually every technological or procedural improvement/date, except the ones that have the most direct and negative effect on pilot QOL. On those they are batting 1.000.
Reply
Old 01-16-2026 | 08:29 PM
  #97  
hoover's Avatar
At your mom's house
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,723
Likes: 488
From: cpt 737
Default

Originally Posted by Proximity
Exactly, SWA making easy hard for 50 years.

Can't we just do it the way everyone else does?
no this is SWAPA making it confusing. They agreed to this crap, and it won't even be implemented for almost 6 months. What a joke. Its been in the contract for 2 yrs plus it's not even an IT issue.
WTF is going on with SWAPA?
Gotta luv even more vague language of " on or around the 11th". JFC!
Remember the company think adjacent is anywhere between two trips not next to.
"Around" may mean when we get around to it.
SWAPA doesn't speak for me anymore if this is what they think is ok.
Its simething so small and easy and everyone already does it and they royally eff it up.
Reply
Old 01-16-2026 | 09:54 PM
  #98  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,707
Likes: 332
Default

Originally Posted by hoover
no this is SWAPA making it confusing. They agreed to this crap, and it won't even be implemented for almost 6 months. What a joke. Its been in the contract for 2 yrs plus it's not even an IT issue.
WTF is going on with SWAPA?
Gotta luv even more vague language of " on or around the 11th". JFC!
Remember the company think adjacent is anywhere between two trips not next to.
"Around" may mean when we get around to it.
SWAPA doesn't speak for me anymore if this is what they think is ok.
It’s simething so small and easy and everyone already does it and they royally eff it up.
Seriously…how hard is it to just give a jumpseater the best seat available at time of check in? And then let them pre-board. If the flight fills up, you call FDJS or 4th on 4th and the last pax gets your seat. LIKE EVERYONE ELSE DOES IT.

I feel like we’re constantly being punk’d.

“hey, we’re reducing your arrival fuel to 4.8. Didn’t work last time but we got better software now….so trust us”

”our way of staffing is great! 600 displacements isn’t bad…”

”here’s a flow chart to figure out how to pick a seat on the app…”

“Here’s a 12 page memo on how to set the missed altitude…”

“The PF is the PE unless they tell the PM to do some PE and then the PF is the PV. Got it? Execute!”

Policies shouldn’t be written by idiots who do less time in a jet in a year than most do in a week.
Reply
Old 01-16-2026 | 10:29 PM
  #99  
mulcher's Avatar
gets time off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,516
Likes: 98
Default

And so many think these swapull clowns were any different. It’s the same association it’s always been. Funny stuff really. My GAS meter is empty swapull can shove all this up their butts. It’s not worth trying to get people on board. This pilot group is hopeless. Next contract won’t do anything SWA doesn’t want SWApULL to do. Those clowns just look at what color the drapes will be. Maybe the SC can work against us or JR.
Reply
Old 01-16-2026 | 11:10 PM
  #100  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 589
Likes: 72
Default

Originally Posted by flyguy81
Seriously…how hard is it to just give a jumpseater the best seat available at time of check in? And then let them pre-board. If the flight fills up, you call FDJS or 4th on 4th and the last pax gets your seat. LIKE EVERYONE ELSE DOES IT.

I feel like we’re constantly being punk’d.

“hey, we’re reducing your arrival fuel to 4.8. Didn’t work last time but we got better software now….so trust us”

”our way of staffing is great! 600 displacements isn’t bad…”

”here’s a flow chart to figure out how to pick a seat on the app…”

“Here’s a 12 page memo on how to set the missed altitude…”

“The PF is the PE unless they tell the PM to do some PE and then the PF is the PV. Got it? Execute!”

Policies shouldn’t be written by idiots who do less time in a jet in a year than most do in a week.
Nailed it. Post of the year.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Josef
SkyWest
53
01-19-2024 08:12 PM
rickB
Part 135
29
10-26-2011 01:12 PM
js081285
Major
75
06-14-2007 05:25 AM
fireman0174
Major
21
05-21-2006 04:09 PM
corl737
Major
22
11-10-2005 08:05 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices