We got an AIP!
#191
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,603
Likes: 0
#192
#193
Line Holder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,600
Likes: 33
Forget legacies; let's compare this AIP with Southwest...
Substandard pay rates
Substandard retirement
No profit sharing (huge amount of money)
PBS (SWA still has line bidding)
Plus, SWA (and others) are gearing up for their next contract.
Exactly what management wants you to focus on. Here's the problem... What will the other airlines' pay be in 3 or 4 years? Guess where Spirit's pay will be in comparison. Right back to the current situation.
Substandard pay rates
Substandard retirement
No profit sharing (huge amount of money)
PBS (SWA still has line bidding)
Plus, SWA (and others) are gearing up for their next contract.
Exactly what management wants you to focus on. Here's the problem... What will the other airlines' pay be in 3 or 4 years? Guess where Spirit's pay will be in comparison. Right back to the current situation.
Sitting on ice making "43%" less than the current AIP is my guess. It has already happened once and I'd be surprised if many would be willing to do it again for 6-12 months for additional 15-30k a year.
Timing is everything and we hold hiring potential leverage, but that's it. Everything else in this current contract is outdated crap and hardly worth the risk.
Look, turning turning down a contract when sitting at or near to the top is one thing. THIS IS NOT THAT THING. Like it or not, if you want legacy pay, and not Alaska legacy pay because they're whining too, go to a legacy. It always has been and always will be.
Passer, I'll give you a 5% chance you'll get to strike in the current climate. But as Jim Carey says, "so your saying I've got a chance".
Best of luck all. I'm waiting to READ the TA because this much speculation is useless.
#194
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,150
Likes: 0
From: Left,Right, Left, Right,Right,Left, Right, Left
Guess where we'll be with this current mediator?
Sitting on ice making "43%" less than the current AIP is my guess. It has already happened once and I'd be surprised if many would be willing to do it again for 6-12 months for additional 15-30k a year.
Timing is everything and we hold hiring potential leverage, but that's it. Everything else in this current contract is outdated crap and hardly worth the risk.
Look, turning turning down a contract when sitting at or near to the top is one thing. THIS IS NOT THAT THING. Like it or not, if you want legacy pay, and not Alaska legacy pay because they're whining too, go to a legacy. It always has been and always will be.
Passer, I'll give you a 5% chance you'll get to strike in the current climate. But as Jim Carey says, "so your saying I've got a chance".
Best of luck all. I'm waiting to READ the TA because this much speculation is useless.
Sitting on ice making "43%" less than the current AIP is my guess. It has already happened once and I'd be surprised if many would be willing to do it again for 6-12 months for additional 15-30k a year.
Timing is everything and we hold hiring potential leverage, but that's it. Everything else in this current contract is outdated crap and hardly worth the risk.
Look, turning turning down a contract when sitting at or near to the top is one thing. THIS IS NOT THAT THING. Like it or not, if you want legacy pay, and not Alaska legacy pay because they're whining too, go to a legacy. It always has been and always will be.
Passer, I'll give you a 5% chance you'll get to strike in the current climate. But as Jim Carey says, "so your saying I've got a chance".
Best of luck all. I'm waiting to READ the TA because this much speculation is useless.
This is hands down the best time in a long time to be negotiating a contract.
Best of luck to all negotiating!
#195
Line Holder
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 495
Likes: 1
From: A320 CA
Sorry to butt in here, but if I may make a suggestion... I keep seeing the 43% pay raise statistic being mentioned. I think you all are falling for a sleight of hand via the creative application of statistics.
I haven't done the math because I'm not privy to the actual proposed pay rates, but I would suspect that the large increases in the lower end of your scale are artificially inflating the reported pay raise percentage.
If I were you all, the percentage I'd like to see is a comparison between actual payroll per pilot in 2017 versus if this proposal were applied to 2017. I have no knowledge of your actual numbers, but you can bet that your negotiating committee members do. I would guess the sum total of givebacks versus improvements would put your actual raise at far less than 43%.
Just the humble suggestion of an outsider looking in. Carry on.
I haven't done the math because I'm not privy to the actual proposed pay rates, but I would suspect that the large increases in the lower end of your scale are artificially inflating the reported pay raise percentage.
If I were you all, the percentage I'd like to see is a comparison between actual payroll per pilot in 2017 versus if this proposal were applied to 2017. I have no knowledge of your actual numbers, but you can bet that your negotiating committee members do. I would guess the sum total of givebacks versus improvements would put your actual raise at far less than 43%.
Just the humble suggestion of an outsider looking in. Carry on.
Last edited by OpenClimb; 01-14-2018 at 08:41 AM. Reason: English is hard...
#196
Banned
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Look, its a Negotiation, you arent going to get everything you want and you sure as hell arent going to go from the lowest paid to the highest in one cycle.
Im not telling anyone how to vote just pointing out some of the positives among the negatives that some are focusing on.
Ive also heard of some lunatics on the Anti-PBS chat say this contract will cost them money. They are completely out of their minds. The only way that would ever be possible is if they violated the CBA numerous times, every month.
#197
Line Holder
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 495
Likes: 1
From: A320 CA
As a follow-up...
Believe me, I'm not casting stones. I have every reason to believe my peers will be every bit as susceptible to this kind of statistical optimism as any other pilot group.
I just believe that the best decisions are made when they are based on actual, meaningful information, not someone's twisting of numbers such that the message isn't quite an outright lie, but it isn't really the whole truth, either.
Believe me, I'm not casting stones. I have every reason to believe my peers will be every bit as susceptible to this kind of statistical optimism as any other pilot group.
I just believe that the best decisions are made when they are based on actual, meaningful information, not someone's twisting of numbers such that the message isn't quite an outright lie, but it isn't really the whole truth, either.
#198
Sorry to butt in here, but if I may make a suggestion... I keep seeing the 43% pay raise statistic being mentioned. I think you all are falling for a sleight of hand via the creative application of statistics.
I haven't done the math because I'm not privy to the actual proposed pay rates, but I would suspect that the large increases in the lower end of your scale are artificially inflating the reported pay raise percentage.
If I were you all, the percentage I'd like to see is a comparison between actual payroll per pilot in 2017 versus if this proposal were applied to 2017. I have no knowledge of your actual numbers, but you can bet that your negotiating committee members do. I would guess the sum total of givebacks versus improvements would put your actual raise at far less than 43%.
Just the humble suggestion of an outsider looking in. Carry on.
I haven't done the math because I'm not privy to the actual proposed pay rates, but I would suspect that the large increases in the lower end of your scale are artificially inflating the reported pay raise percentage.
If I were you all, the percentage I'd like to see is a comparison between actual payroll per pilot in 2017 versus if this proposal were applied to 2017. I have no knowledge of your actual numbers, but you can bet that your negotiating committee members do. I would guess the sum total of givebacks versus improvements would put your actual raise at far less than 43%.
Just the humble suggestion of an outsider looking in. Carry on.
Applying just trip rigs and hourly rate increase I would have made $6500 more this month under the terms listed in the aip. That’s roughly 41%.
#200
Sorry to butt in here, but if I may make a suggestion... I keep seeing the 43% pay raise statistic being mentioned. I think you all are falling for a sleight of hand via the creative application of statistics.
I haven't done the math because I'm not privy to the actual proposed pay rates, but I would suspect that the large increases in the lower end of your scale are artificially inflating the reported pay raise percentage.
If I were you all, the percentage I'd like to see is a comparison between actual payroll per pilot in 2017 versus if this proposal were applied to 2017. I have no knowledge of your actual numbers, but you can bet that your negotiating committee members do. I would guess the sum total of givebacks versus improvements would put your actual raise at far less than 43%.
Just the humble suggestion of an outsider looking in. Carry on.
I haven't done the math because I'm not privy to the actual proposed pay rates, but I would suspect that the large increases in the lower end of your scale are artificially inflating the reported pay raise percentage.
If I were you all, the percentage I'd like to see is a comparison between actual payroll per pilot in 2017 versus if this proposal were applied to 2017. I have no knowledge of your actual numbers, but you can bet that your negotiating committee members do. I would guess the sum total of givebacks versus improvements would put your actual raise at far less than 43%.
Just the humble suggestion of an outsider looking in. Carry on.
Yes I'm quite aware of the LTD and scope issues so save those comments. I've just seen/heard far too many junior Airbii/recently paroled RJ pilots over the past 24 hours drooling over these rates and an additional $8k (if equally divided) to the signing bonus and that's disappointing.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



