JetBlue purchase of Spirt
#161
All true. What someone in your position will fail to consider, or care about, is what someone on the other side loses for you to keep 100% relative seniority. Not criticizing you, it's just pilot-nature. For you to lose nothing, someone with several more years of seniority, who WOULD have much better future seniority progression, would have hundreds or possibly 1,000+ guys with fewer years and an average age younger than them placed ahead of them. So while you would lose nothing with full relative, guys on the other side would lose most of their FUTURE seniority progression. You know how important that is as you have already looked ahead at your future seniority progression and very much look forward to it.
With such a diametrically opposed seniority/age profile between the two companies, there is no perfect answer. All (virtually all) will have to compromise and give up some of their current or future seniority. It's gonna sting for most of us a little, but ultimately won't be a windfall or catastrophe.
With such a diametrically opposed seniority/age profile between the two companies, there is no perfect answer. All (virtually all) will have to compromise and give up some of their current or future seniority. It's gonna sting for most of us a little, but ultimately won't be a windfall or catastrophe.
I will definitely be gone before most at NK, as we do have a really young group, and none I've talked to with around 8 years in and more than 20 years to go are planning to leave (surprisingly, imo). For me it's 20% at RS, 40% at DOH, and pretty much straight interpolation in between, so guessing I'll end up around 30%. So in seat going from 40% to 60%, and that is before I take the A220 into account. But the A220 pays better than I make now, so could always be more senior there......
Didn't ask for the merger, none of us did.
Moving forward will focus on pushing for a good contract, be it CBA or JCBA.
Last edited by symbian simian; 08-17-2022 at 09:31 AM. Reason: Splleing
#162
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2022
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
From: A320CA
Maybe we should do it on Relative seniority based on projected position 10 years from now? /S.
I will definitely be gone before most at NK, as we do have a really young group, and none I've talked to with around 8 years in and more than 20 years to go are planning to leave (surprisingly, imo). For me it's 20% at RS, 40% at DOH, and pretty much straight interpolation in between, so guessing I'll end up around 30%. So in seat going from 40% to 60%, and that is before I take the A220 into account. But the A220 pays better than I make now, so could always be more senior there......
Didn't ask for the merger, none of us did.
Moving forward will focus on pushing for a good contract, be it CBA or JCBA.
I will definitely be gone before most at NK, as we do have a really young group, and none I've talked to with around 8 years in and more than 20 years to go are planning to leave (surprisingly, imo). For me it's 20% at RS, 40% at DOH, and pretty much straight interpolation in between, so guessing I'll end up around 30%. So in seat going from 40% to 60%, and that is before I take the A220 into account. But the A220 pays better than I make now, so could always be more senior there......
Didn't ask for the merger, none of us did.
Moving forward will focus on pushing for a good contract, be it CBA or JCBA.
No way. JB pilots have more longevity. It’ll never happen. A weighted average of both is the way it will go.
#164
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2022
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
From: A320CA
#165
#166
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2022
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
From: A320CA
#168
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 3,469
Likes: 44
Sorry to change the subject…I know this debate about SLI was so interesting (sarcasm) but looks like it’s a good time to be exiting the ULCC model.
https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/a...193305669.html
if this goes through. might be a more even playing field and ultra low cost airlines would lose their advantage
https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/a...193305669.html
if this goes through. might be a more even playing field and ultra low cost airlines would lose their advantage
#169
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 4,174
Likes: 157
Sorry to change the subject…I know this debate about SLI was so interesting (sarcasm) but looks like it’s a good time to be exiting the ULCC model.
https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/a...193305669.html
if this goes through. might be a more even playing field and ultra low cost airlines would lose their advantage
https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/a...193305669.html
if this goes through. might be a more even playing field and ultra low cost airlines would lose their advantage
#170
That/It/Thang
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 3,500
Likes: 362
Really doubt anybody is/will offer more seat pitch because the FAA is only concerned if existing seat pitch is a threat to health and safety, not passenger comfort. Seat pitch has and will continue to go one way, less. Eventually down the road Americans will be so fat it will become a heath issue risk and then the FAA will require an extra inch. Far from being comfortable
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



