TA Discussion
#91
On Reserve
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
1. LTD raise to 11k, with some provisions.
2. “pilots must be offered recall prior to any merger announcement.” If we merge we are all better off with our current list...and everyone active. If something were to happen in the spring and there are 2850 plus on the street that will directly impact the bottom 2/3rds...ask any legacy UAL guy how the merger integration went for the folks on furlough. This, in my opinion is the reason for the bottom half of the list to pay attention. Vote however you decide, but understand there are ramifications to both yes and no.
#92
On Reserve
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 25
Likes: 3
If this thing isn’t trending in the right direction in 8 months, then we furlough, then snap back, and then bankruptcy. It appears to me UA and the Union came up with a plan to keep pilots on property until summer, hoping travel demand will increase dramatically after a vaccine, hence the snap-back provisions. If demand remains low (500k yesterday), most of us are screwed anyway. I’ll continue to study the TA, and come here to read about what you guys think. Undecided...
#93
New Hire
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
2 furloughs under my belt, thrown to the wolves and felt pretty abandoned by our union, so if there is a chance that all the friends I helped get hired here in the last couple years get a “choice”, something is better than nothing for my fellow United pilots.
When I came off my second furlough, I wasn’t really interested in racking up hours as a 14 year veteran pretty close to still being a probationary pilot....yeah,, so for my first 4 years back, I only averaged 33hrs/month...so 50-60 hrs a month doesn’t sound bad at all. Less total pay, sure, but if I have learned anything, it is this...create multiple cash flow streams and don’t ever depend on the airlines to meet all of your needs...stocks, rental homes, a side business...more time to develop your million dollar idea or have more quality time...looking forward to some international travel once things open up...oh yeah, and I grabbed a $100k out of my United 401k, thank you CARES Act and get to invest it somewhere else.
When I came off my second furlough, I wasn’t really interested in racking up hours as a 14 year veteran pretty close to still being a probationary pilot....yeah,, so for my first 4 years back, I only averaged 33hrs/month...so 50-60 hrs a month doesn’t sound bad at all. Less total pay, sure, but if I have learned anything, it is this...create multiple cash flow streams and don’t ever depend on the airlines to meet all of your needs...stocks, rental homes, a side business...more time to develop your million dollar idea or have more quality time...looking forward to some international travel once things open up...oh yeah, and I grabbed a $100k out of my United 401k, thank you CARES Act and get to invest it somewhere else.
#94
Banned
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 657
Likes: 0
From: B-737 Captain
I guess I’ve made peace with the next few years sucking pretty bad if you were on the bottom 40% of a legacy airline. to me, this is more about what things look like 2 to 3 years from now.
if demand stays suppressed at under 60% levels, thus giving us the MPG‘s you stated, the double furloughees and senior bottom third guys who are very frustrated about a pay cut have a lot more to worry about than lower MPG… As an upper lower third guy, I think you’ve got to look a little further out than the next 6 to 8 months.
again, totally get it if you are a senior BES top 2/3 person. This concretely means a pay cut for you. For the rest of us… A little game-theory (if-then many scenarios three to four moves) about the future and napkin math would suggest this is the lesser of many evils
if demand stays suppressed at under 60% levels, thus giving us the MPG‘s you stated, the double furloughees and senior bottom third guys who are very frustrated about a pay cut have a lot more to worry about than lower MPG… As an upper lower third guy, I think you’ve got to look a little further out than the next 6 to 8 months.
again, totally get it if you are a senior BES top 2/3 person. This concretely means a pay cut for you. For the rest of us… A little game-theory (if-then many scenarios three to four moves) about the future and napkin math would suggest this is the lesser of many evils
#95
New Hire
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
It’s very possible I’m reading it wrong, but I am seeing a 63 hour mpg if we are above 50% of our block hours for a given bid period. 10% of 70 hrs MPG = 7, so unless we dip below 50% block hours, in which case many more than 3900 of us are f-ed, I’m seeing a 10% cut. Obviously the lines are to be slimmer than usual, but that is going to be the case either way.
if you are senior in your BES and were not displaced, I could totally understand a NO vote… If you are in the top 2/3rds and got a displacement letter, I’m having a hard time seeing how this is a net negative in pay for (the proverbial) you.
Please tell me if I’ve got that wrong. I’m trying to understand the implications for the entire group
if you are senior in your BES and were not displaced, I could totally understand a NO vote… If you are in the top 2/3rds and got a displacement letter, I’m having a hard time seeing how this is a net negative in pay for (the proverbial) you.
Please tell me if I’ve got that wrong. I’m trying to understand the implications for the entire group
I'm in the middle 2/3 as you described with a displacement award to the 787. Under the LOA, I would be getting 52hrs at roughly $280/hr which equals $14,560 /mo. Without the LOA , and displaced, I would be getting around 75 hrs at roughly $240/ hr which equals $18,000. So under the LOA that's an approximate loss of $3440 per month. Is there somthing I missed in this equation?
#96
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 0
From: 787 Captain
Not true. LPAs will be 74-82 per current contract with MPG 70/73.
#97
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
I'm in the middle 2/3 as you described with a displacement award to the 787. Under the LOA, I would be getting 52hrs at roughly $280/hr which equals $14,560 /mo. Without the LOA , and displaced, I would be getting around 75 hrs at roughly $240/ hr which equals $18,000. So under the LOA that's an approximate loss of $3440 per month. Is there somthing I missed in this equation?
#98
I'm in the middle 2/3 as you described with a displacement award to the 787. Under the LOA, I would be getting 52hrs at roughly $280/hr which equals $14,560 /mo. Without the LOA , and displaced, I would be getting around 75 hrs at roughly $240/ hr which equals $18,000. So under the LOA that's an approximate loss of $3440 per month. Is there somthing I missed in this equation?
#99
On Reserve
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Seems like a win/win deal to me. The pilots win in the short term by delaying the furlough’s until June and the company wins in the long term by getting a concessionary contract with the pilots paying for most of the cost of the delayed furlough. Then after June they get their furlough and keep the money from the ALV for 24 months. Then again it could be a lose/lose depending on you’re point of view. Company loses until June. Pilots lose for years. I’m a glass half full guy so lest say win/win!
#100
I'm in the middle 2/3 as you described with a displacement award to the 787. Under the LOA, I would be getting 52hrs at roughly $280/hr which equals $14,560 /mo. Without the LOA , and displaced, I would be getting around 75 hrs at roughly $240/ hr which equals $18,000. So under the LOA that's an approximate loss of $3440 per month. Is there somthing I missed in this equation?
If we are at 55% which I think is more likely for late spring, you’re at $17,640. Once we hit 57.5%, you’re above your displaced number.
this is my basic premise, that I don’t really understand how people are not acknowledging. If we continue to be on the low end of the mpg table, as many people are using to evaluate their pay if this passes, our airline is in deep deep trouble. So, I guess I don’t understand a scenario where we’re at 50% or less and guys think the airline will keep trucking along with even 8,000 pilots. So, If 5,000+ furloughs happen, game-changer is an understatement. the pay a 2/3rd pilot and anyone under 5,000 system seniority should be evaluating isn’t WB pay, but NB.
again, I urge people to actually go through the motions of looking at what will actually be happening at UAL if we are still experiencing the block hour numbers that people are bandying about when looking at the AIP MPG table
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Hflyr51
Flight Schools and Training
11
06-25-2018 03:30 AM



