TA Discussion
#112
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2012
Posts: 456
Ever since I got hired I’ve always been told that when a contract comes out for MR “you HAVE to look at the whole thing...everyone just goes and looks at the pay tables, and that’s why a few dollars raise always gets a yes vote!”
So...anyone smart on the scope stuff? To a relatively new guy, it seems like good gives on the company’s part, but then gets into some details and numbers that leave me scratching my head.
Also, first class DH...I mean, come on guys, how great is that.
So...anyone smart on the scope stuff? To a relatively new guy, it seems like good gives on the company’s part, but then gets into some details and numbers that leave me scratching my head.
Also, first class DH...I mean, come on guys, how great is that.
#113
Are you really that Obtuse? Not name calling but serious Question! We are running at 40% right now. Do you ever talk to or email or read the pairing committees emails or people from the pairing review?
Our own union put our and email stating recovery isn’t happening to 2019 levels till 2023-2024 at best. From our own union.
You wonder if the guys negotiating this are taking a pay cut? Or are they still getting 90 plus hours? Curious? Maybe!
but what say you when in June next year united furloughs and we are all still left with their POS LOA?
Our own union put our and email stating recovery isn’t happening to 2019 levels till 2023-2024 at best. From our own union.
You wonder if the guys negotiating this are taking a pay cut? Or are they still getting 90 plus hours? Curious? Maybe!
but what say you when in June next year united furloughs and we are all still left with their POS LOA?
I’m not saying that our current block hours would have us at the left end of the AIP table. What I’m saying is that if they’re at 40% now, I think 55% is reasonable by next spring. That’s a long way from fully recovered. It’s actually pretty terrible, but it gets the 2/3 tier up to a 10% cut under contractual MPG.
if we don’t furlough More than 2,000 next June, then demand is undoubtedly over 70% and the top 2/3rds keep their full UPA pay
If demand is still under 67.5% going into next fall (the top two thirds are at full UPA MPG), we definitely furlough. If we furlough over the magic 2,000 number, the LOA is null and void and all the NO votes get their “full” pay. I guess at worst we call it a semi-failed experiment perhaps (except that it bought many of our pilots an extra 8 months to find a way to take care of their families).
the more interesting and dire scenario is if demand is as depressed through 2022 as it seems you believe is likely. In that case, the bottom half of the 2/3 tier will be bumped to NB right seat, half of TK will be moth-balled, and countless other assets and employee groups will be gutted to try and reshape the airline to be able to operate in any semblance of a profitable business. In that case a decrease in MPG is the least if your/our worries.
So, demand is either not coming back and the middle tier is going to be far more affected than they currently seem to believe. Either through furloughs, bumps or bankruptcy.
or demand comes back to 67.5% plus and the top 2/3rds of the airline keep the current seats and current UPA MPG
#114
maybe I’m obtuse dude, but I think my logic follows. I’ll state it again and you can tell me where our scenarios for the future diverge.
I’m not saying that our current block hours would have us at the left end of the AIP table. What I’m saying is that if they’re at 40% now, I think 55% is reasonable by next spring. That’s a long way from fully recovered. It’s actually pretty terrible, but it gets the 2/3 tier up to a 10% cut under contractual MPG.
if we don’t furlough More than 2,000 next June, then demand is undoubtedly over 70% and the top 2/3rds keep their full UPA pay
If demand is still under 67.5% going into next fall (the top two thirds are at full UPA MPG), we definitely furlough. If we furlough over the magic 2,000 number, the LOA is null and void and all the NO votes get their “full” pay. I guess at worst we call it a semi-failed experiment perhaps (except that it bought many of our pilots an extra 8 months to find a way to take care of their families).
the more interesting and dire scenario is if demand is as depressed through 2022 as it seems you believe is likely. In that case, the bottom half of the 2/3 tier will be bumped to NB right seat, half of TK will be moth-balled, and countless other assets and employee groups will be gutted to try and reshape the airline to be able to operate in any semblance of a profitable business. In that case a decrease in MPG is the least if your/our worries.
So, demand is either not coming back and the middle tier is going to be far more affected than they currently seem to believe. Either through furloughs, bumps or bankruptcy.
or demand comes back to 67.5% plus and the top 2/3rds of the airline keep the current seats and current UPA MPG
I’m not saying that our current block hours would have us at the left end of the AIP table. What I’m saying is that if they’re at 40% now, I think 55% is reasonable by next spring. That’s a long way from fully recovered. It’s actually pretty terrible, but it gets the 2/3 tier up to a 10% cut under contractual MPG.
if we don’t furlough More than 2,000 next June, then demand is undoubtedly over 70% and the top 2/3rds keep their full UPA pay
If demand is still under 67.5% going into next fall (the top two thirds are at full UPA MPG), we definitely furlough. If we furlough over the magic 2,000 number, the LOA is null and void and all the NO votes get their “full” pay. I guess at worst we call it a semi-failed experiment perhaps (except that it bought many of our pilots an extra 8 months to find a way to take care of their families).
the more interesting and dire scenario is if demand is as depressed through 2022 as it seems you believe is likely. In that case, the bottom half of the 2/3 tier will be bumped to NB right seat, half of TK will be moth-balled, and countless other assets and employee groups will be gutted to try and reshape the airline to be able to operate in any semblance of a profitable business. In that case a decrease in MPG is the least if your/our worries.
So, demand is either not coming back and the middle tier is going to be far more affected than they currently seem to believe. Either through furloughs, bumps or bankruptcy.
or demand comes back to 67.5% plus and the top 2/3rds of the airline keep the current seats and current UPA MPG
I don’t disagree with some of what you said..But I want us to agree to on thing first. The company WILL furlough ~2000 come June 2021. Just admit that. Travel and business will not rebound by then. Even best guess is vaccine by 2Q 2021 so let’s agree to that primarily. Also let’s agree to we are taking a pay cut for 24 months at a rate to be determined.
also let’s agree these 2 things are totally separate. Both will happen at different time and both have little impact on the other.
agree? Then let proceed...
#115
Does anybody else notice the most important part of the TA, the MPG table, isn't included in the executive summary? I was giving ALPA the benefit of the doubt on this one, but they just lost my trust. They have an agenda. As someone with a furlough notice in hand, this one's a NO.
Curious. I'll go to the ALPA zoom meeting, and council meetings to hear more.
Last edited by Dave Fitzgerald; 09-16-2020 at 08:32 PM.
#117
I don’t disagree with some of what you said..But I want us to agree to on thing first. The company WILL furlough ~2000 come June 2021. Just admit that. Travel and business will not rebound by then. Even best guess is vaccine by 2Q 2021 so let’s agree to that primarily. Also let’s agree to we are taking a pay cut for 24 months at a rate to be determined.
also let’s agree these 2 things are totally separate. Both will happen at different time and both have little impact on the other.
agree? Then let proceed...
also let’s agree these 2 things are totally separate. Both will happen at different time and both have little impact on the other.
agree? Then let proceed...
#118
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 328
I’m needing some clarification on the pay rate protections (yes, I filed a PDR), but looking to see if anyone here can clarify. Is everyone pay protected at the rate they were getting as of June 2020?? Background info, I’m a junior 320 CA at the upper end of the “junior group” (9300s seniority). Displaced to 737FO on the 20-07D bid and scheduled to start training in October. Do I keep the 320CA rate or go to the 737FO rate??
Still not convinced that dividing the pilot group is a good thing. Undecided.
Still not convinced that dividing the pilot group is a good thing. Undecided.
#119
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2018
Position: B-737 Captain
Posts: 655
it’s funded 65/35% by the company/pilots. The big change is the max monthly benefit is increasing from 8K to 11k. Huge. And yes.... not until Oct 2021, but a permanent get.
#120
the language in the full TA gives every category That is having the displacement cancelled (Actually going back to that seat). I don’t know your base but you can look it up in the TA if it applies to you. If you don’t fit in the cancelled displacement category you will still be pay protected to whatever pay rate you were at on the last day of the June bid period.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Hflyr51
Flight Schools and Training
11
06-25-2018 03:30 AM