Search
Notices

TA Discussion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-16-2020, 07:34 PM
  #111  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: 757 Capt
Posts: 798
Default

Originally Posted by 250 or point 65 View Post
It's not precovid vs TA. It's covid without TA vs Covid with TA.
Those 10-17 hrs are already gone, man.
Not if the airline is properly staffed.
pipe is offline  
Old 09-16-2020, 07:47 PM
  #112  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2012
Posts: 456
Default

Ever since I got hired I’ve always been told that when a contract comes out for MR “you HAVE to look at the whole thing...everyone just goes and looks at the pay tables, and that’s why a few dollars raise always gets a yes vote!”

So...anyone smart on the scope stuff? To a relatively new guy, it seems like good gives on the company’s part, but then gets into some details and numbers that leave me scratching my head.

Also, first class DH...I mean, come on guys, how great is that.
Galaxy5 is offline  
Old 09-16-2020, 07:54 PM
  #113  
Gets Weekends Off
 
duvie's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: WB Bunkie
Posts: 1,246
Default

Originally Posted by bottoms up View Post
Are you really that Obtuse? Not name calling but serious Question! We are running at 40% right now. Do you ever talk to or email or read the pairing committees emails or people from the pairing review?

Our own union put our and email stating recovery isn’t happening to 2019 levels till 2023-2024 at best. From our own union.

You wonder if the guys negotiating this are taking a pay cut? Or are they still getting 90 plus hours? Curious? Maybe!

but what say you when in June next year united furloughs and we are all still left with their POS LOA?
maybe I’m obtuse dude, but I think my logic follows. I’ll state it again and you can tell me where our scenarios for the future diverge.

I’m not saying that our current block hours would have us at the left end of the AIP table. What I’m saying is that if they’re at 40% now, I think 55% is reasonable by next spring. That’s a long way from fully recovered. It’s actually pretty terrible, but it gets the 2/3 tier up to a 10% cut under contractual MPG.

if we don’t furlough More than 2,000 next June, then demand is undoubtedly over 70% and the top 2/3rds keep their full UPA pay

If demand is still under 67.5% going into next fall (the top two thirds are at full UPA MPG), we definitely furlough. If we furlough over the magic 2,000 number, the LOA is null and void and all the NO votes get their “full” pay. I guess at worst we call it a semi-failed experiment perhaps (except that it bought many of our pilots an extra 8 months to find a way to take care of their families).

the more interesting and dire scenario is if demand is as depressed through 2022 as it seems you believe is likely. In that case, the bottom half of the 2/3 tier will be bumped to NB right seat, half of TK will be moth-balled, and countless other assets and employee groups will be gutted to try and reshape the airline to be able to operate in any semblance of a profitable business. In that case a decrease in MPG is the least if your/our worries.

So, demand is either not coming back and the middle tier is going to be far more affected than they currently seem to believe. Either through furloughs, bumps or bankruptcy.

or demand comes back to 67.5% plus and the top 2/3rds of the airline keep the current seats and current UPA MPG
duvie is offline  
Old 09-16-2020, 08:03 PM
  #114  
Gets Weekends Off
 
bottoms up's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Position: non reclining seat
Posts: 447
Default

Originally Posted by duvie View Post
maybe I’m obtuse dude, but I think my logic follows. I’ll state it again and you can tell me where our scenarios for the future diverge.

I’m not saying that our current block hours would have us at the left end of the AIP table. What I’m saying is that if they’re at 40% now, I think 55% is reasonable by next spring. That’s a long way from fully recovered. It’s actually pretty terrible, but it gets the 2/3 tier up to a 10% cut under contractual MPG.

if we don’t furlough More than 2,000 next June, then demand is undoubtedly over 70% and the top 2/3rds keep their full UPA pay

If demand is still under 67.5% going into next fall (the top two thirds are at full UPA MPG), we definitely furlough. If we furlough over the magic 2,000 number, the LOA is null and void and all the NO votes get their “full” pay. I guess at worst we call it a semi-failed experiment perhaps (except that it bought many of our pilots an extra 8 months to find a way to take care of their families).

the more interesting and dire scenario is if demand is as depressed through 2022 as it seems you believe is likely. In that case, the bottom half of the 2/3 tier will be bumped to NB right seat, half of TK will be moth-balled, and countless other assets and employee groups will be gutted to try and reshape the airline to be able to operate in any semblance of a profitable business. In that case a decrease in MPG is the least if your/our worries.

So, demand is either not coming back and the middle tier is going to be far more affected than they currently seem to believe. Either through furloughs, bumps or bankruptcy.

or demand comes back to 67.5% plus and the top 2/3rds of the airline keep the current seats and current UPA MPG

I don’t disagree with some of what you said..But I want us to agree to on thing first. The company WILL furlough ~2000 come June 2021. Just admit that. Travel and business will not rebound by then. Even best guess is vaccine by 2Q 2021 so let’s agree to that primarily. Also let’s agree to we are taking a pay cut for 24 months at a rate to be determined.

also let’s agree these 2 things are totally separate. Both will happen at different time and both have little impact on the other.

agree? Then let proceed...
bottoms up is offline  
Old 09-16-2020, 08:07 PM
  #115  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Dave Fitzgerald's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Position: 777
Posts: 2,158
Default

Originally Posted by vipereaglebus View Post
Does anybody else notice the most important part of the TA, the MPG table, isn't included in the executive summary? I was giving ALPA the benefit of the doubt on this one, but they just lost my trust. They have an agenda. As someone with a furlough notice in hand, this one's a NO.
Bingo! That one popped right out at me. Why did they not include it in the summary? Selling too hard? Not hiding anything, unless you don't actually read the agreement. But I'm sure everyone will read the whole thing.

Curious. I'll go to the ALPA zoom meeting, and council meetings to hear more.

Last edited by Dave Fitzgerald; 09-16-2020 at 08:32 PM.
Dave Fitzgerald is offline  
Old 09-16-2020, 08:15 PM
  #116  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 501
Default

Originally Posted by Dave Fitzgerald View Post
Bingo! That one popped right out at me.
It popped right out at me too when I opened the full TA which was attached to the same email as the summary.
Barley is offline  
Old 09-16-2020, 08:22 PM
  #117  
Gets Weekends Off
 
duvie's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: WB Bunkie
Posts: 1,246
Default

Originally Posted by bottoms up View Post
I don’t disagree with some of what you said..But I want us to agree to on thing first. The company WILL furlough ~2000 come June 2021. Just admit that. Travel and business will not rebound by then. Even best guess is vaccine by 2Q 2021 so let’s agree to that primarily. Also let’s agree to we are taking a pay cut for 24 months at a rate to be determined.

also let’s agree these 2 things are totally separate. Both will happen at different time and both have little impact on the other.

agree? Then let proceed...
I agree 👍🏼 It’s a gamble. But one I’m willing to take, because I don’t see doing nothing as a better alternative for the airline (not SK or any other c-suite) and most of our pilot group
duvie is offline  
Old 09-16-2020, 08:26 PM
  #118  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 328
Default

Originally Posted by flightmedic01 View Post
I’m needing some clarification on the pay rate protections (yes, I filed a PDR), but looking to see if anyone here can clarify. Is everyone pay protected at the rate they were getting as of June 2020?? Background info, I’m a junior 320 CA at the upper end of the “junior group” (9300s seniority). Displaced to 737FO on the 20-07D bid and scheduled to start training in October. Do I keep the 320CA rate or go to the 737FO rate??

Still not convinced that dividing the pilot group is a good thing. Undecided.
the language in the full TA gives every category That is having the displacement cancelled (Actually going back to that seat). I don’t know your base but you can look it up in the TA if it applies to you. If you don’t fit in the cancelled displacement category you will still be pay protected to whatever pay rate you were at on the last day of the June bid period.
MiLa is offline  
Old 09-16-2020, 08:31 PM
  #119  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2018
Position: B-737 Captain
Posts: 655
Default

Originally Posted by RomeoHotel View Post
I always thought the LTD was pilot funded....

Ya it is. Have a lot of funds in there, so thats why I assume its going up.
it’s funded 65/35% by the company/pilots. The big change is the max monthly benefit is increasing from 8K to 11k. Huge. And yes.... not until Oct 2021, but a permanent get.
guppie is offline  
Old 09-16-2020, 08:38 PM
  #120  
Gets Weekends Off
 
flightmedic01's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Position: Reclining
Posts: 840
Default

Originally Posted by MiLa View Post
the language in the full TA gives every category That is having the displacement cancelled (Actually going back to that seat). I don’t know your base but you can look it up in the TA if it applies to you. If you don’t fit in the cancelled displacement category you will still be pay protected to whatever pay rate you were at on the last day of the June bid period.
Thanks MiLa, yeah I’m EWR based. Not one of the 70 that are cancelled in the 20-07D, so I’m figuring I’m headed to the guppie and still keep the 320CA pay (albeit at 35 hours) if this thing passes.
flightmedic01 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jetlag q
PSA Airlines
55
08-24-2018 12:40 PM
Hflyr51
Flight Schools and Training
11
06-25-2018 03:30 AM
KC10 FATboy
Safety
26
02-27-2017 03:27 PM
Slick111
Regional
1
05-16-2014 03:25 PM
Senior Skipper
GoJet
95
08-08-2012 05:12 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices