Search

Notices

Agreement In Principle

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-24-2022 | 12:00 PM
  #531  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2020
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by AxlF16
Well, since 'ALPA' obviously voted in favor of accepting the TA and sending it to MR it's no surprise the overall push is for a 'yes' vote (assuming that's what happens). There is a mechanism whereby dissenting LEC members (if any) can share their opinions with the pilots. I expect the people that negotiated the TA (and supporting SMEs) to provide their negotiating goals and an honest assessment of where they settled on the continuum. You can call that a sell job if you want, but I don't see any way around this process. Just putting the TA out there with no commentary or explanation will not, and should not, ever happen. Unlike some people, I have faith in the pilot group to fairly and objectively evaluate the TA and vote appropriately. I'm not sure which idealistic, fairytale world has all the pilots that never vote in blocks, or based on personal interests? That's the case in EVERY democratic vote.
I said present the TA with an explanation of the changes absent the sales job. Couple that with a comparison of other peer airline contracts. It isn’t that hard. That should be sufficient with your trust in the pilot group to vote appropriately no?

There have been instances where an MEC Yes vote was accompanied by a less than full throated endorsement. Tactical yes but I’m afraid those days are long behind us.
Reply
Old 05-24-2022 | 12:24 PM
  #532  
RJDio's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 671
Likes: 8
From: CRJ FO
Default

Isn’t the ORD council (5?) on an island with the current MEC? I’m surprised their surrogates haven’t enlightened anyone with the AIP highlights or lack thereof.
Reply
Old 05-24-2022 | 12:27 PM
  #533  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,213
Likes: 14
From: guppy CA
Default

Originally Posted by WHACKMASTER
As for being constantly JMed……that’s a bit of a stretch. Hell, I wish I was JMed more often as 1.5X-2X pay is sweet and if I really don’t want to do it then you can bet that I won’t be flying the JM (or JA as we call it).
Then all of the LUV pilots have been lying to me on the jumpseat. Mandatory JM 1x (or is it 2x) per month.

How come you guys aren't demanding a pay raise while negotiating the rest of the contract?
Reply
Old 05-24-2022 | 12:34 PM
  #534  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2020
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by RJDio
Isn’t the ORD council (5?) on an island with the current MEC? I’m surprised their surrogates haven’t enlightened anyone with the AIP highlights or lack thereof.
I know. Isn’t amazing that some councils will actually stand up against an autocratic Chairman?

It’s going to be fun if and when the details come out. Not only do we have to determine what’s in the contract, but what will be implemented in future contracts.
Reply
Old 05-24-2022 | 01:04 PM
  #535  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,213
Likes: 14
From: guppy CA
Default

Originally Posted by NotMrNiceGuy
I’ll give you some math. Full disclosure: I’m not a UAL pilot. Just an observer that has a vested interest in pattern bargaining. I’ll use WB CA as an example.

Start at $352 for 2019 pay rate.
Factor in 15% pay raise. 5% from the negotiated LOA and an additional 10% for the CBA. Now we’re at $404.80.
The YoY inflation rate from May 2020 to May 2021 was a flat 5%. That puts you at $425.04.
May 2022 inflation isn’t out yet, but if it’s anything like March and April, it will be around 8%. That clears $459.

Of course, none of this takes into account the fullness of a contract and other QOL improvements that would take away from Section 3. Of course all of this is subjective blathering, but I don’t think it would be unreasonable by any means to ask for this pay rate if the number one focus of negotiations was compensation. Each voter will have to decide the cost of the other QOL “gets” in the TA.

Again, not at UA. But we’re in negotiations where I am, and that is roughly my logic. Arrows away!
You've taken the pay raise, and then added inflation on top of that? You're double counting.
Where does May 2020-May2021 come from?

You've got $352 in Jan 2019. Good for one year, until Jan 2020. You now need to compute inflation from there.
The best I can read the number on post #424 is that it's $403.45 on Jan 2023 (add one year and due for a pay raise in Jan 2024).

How much inflation do you show from Jan 2020 through April 2022? I show 12.07%
How much inflation are you computing for April 2022 to Jan 2024?
That those two numbers and use $352/hr.
April 2022 to Jan 2024 would have to come in at ~2.9% in order for the leaked numbers to be inflation neutral. We don't know the future inflation numbers but that looks a bit low. 2020's annual inflation rate was 1.4%; 2019 was 2.3%.
Reply
Old 05-24-2022 | 01:33 PM
  #536  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,020
Likes: 23
From: It's a plane and it's a seat
Default

Originally Posted by sobo
Last I heard, the MEC hasn’t voted to send us anything.

Yeah, that’s because we only have an AIP. Do you even understand the process? Read the union emails. Or just like to complain?
Reply
Old 05-24-2022 | 01:42 PM
  #537  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by flynd94
Yeah, that’s because we only have an AIP. Do you even understand the process? Read the union emails. Or just like to complain?
I was responding to a comment of “how could the union send us something like this” which seemed to be a response to the “leaks” we’re seeing. So, I’m saying to that person they should be patient until the MEC even has a chance to look at the language. There’s a chance the MEC could even kick it back from that point in the process.

Pretty comical response TBH. I chuckled.

What is context?
Reply
Old 05-24-2022 | 01:47 PM
  #538  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 841
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 82spukram
https://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/cpicalc...1&year2=202204

Inflation calculator. 1 dollar in January 2020 is now 1.12.

Assuming free medical,better retirement, sick bank, pay per day for training/vacation, etc and if we get 5% dos plus 5% on January 1st 2023 and if we get an additional 5% for the LOA (no idea if we will get this) then we are keeping pace with inflation in Section 3 and are ahead and other areas.
You're the first person to understand how the dollar works in here. I still hope United gets 1000 an hour to help others bargain.
Reply
Old 05-24-2022 | 02:17 PM
  #539  
Monkeyfly's Avatar
Widebody
10M Airline Miles
15 Years
50 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 778
Likes: 0
From: 777 CAP
Default

I appreciate the idea that we aren’t just voting on section 3. But there’s nothing wrong with having a personal minimum acceptable level of pay despite what else may be in the contract.

For myself that bare minimum has to keep up with inflation. The APC poll I did seemed to favor that. The FOs I have flown with so far have not supported that.
This implies, to me, that a pay cut would be acceptable to these pilots given enough gains in the rest of the contract. Or maybe they just want any raise as soon as possible.

For reference, the pay raise we would need today is around 13% to break even on spending power from 2019 rates.

Plug in your current pay rate here to see what that would be:

https://www.usinflationcalculator.com
Reply
Old 05-24-2022 | 03:04 PM
  #540  
hummingbear's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,453
Likes: 16
Default

Originally Posted by 82spukram
https://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/cpicalc...1&year2=202204

Inflation calculator. 1 dollar in January 2020 is now 1.12.

Assuming free medical,better retirement, sick bank, pay per day for training/vacation, etc and if we get 5% dos plus 5% on January 1st 2023 and if we get an additional 5% for the LOA (no idea if we will get this) then we are keeping pace with inflation in Section 3 and are ahead and other areas.
My concern ever since the LOA was signed was that the company knew the 5% would be years away & that they could just build it into the next pay negotiation. IMO, the new contract needs to keep up with inflation independent of the LOA. Anything less would be “double dipping” on the company’s part.

I’m in agreement that pilots tend to view contracts pretty myopically in terms of pay rates, but inflation has been brutal the past couple of years, so this time around it actually does matter a lot.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rickair7777
SkyWest
453
04-20-2020 02:36 PM
shoelu
Major
5
09-03-2015 12:16 PM
ERJ135
American
26
02-26-2013 05:54 PM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JungleBus
Major
121
12-20-2008 04:13 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices