Search

Notices

Agreement In Principle

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-24-2022 | 09:32 AM
  #511  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,213
Likes: 14
From: guppy CA
Default

Originally Posted by AxlF16
Don't we always caution the 'new guys' to read the whole contract...NOT just section 3? That also applies to those on the outside looking in. We have valuable workable protections that are meaningless to SWA pilots right? Our pilot group will value this contract as it applies to US. Pay rates arent the full story.
I completely agree. I'm just weary of reading comments that the AIP's pay is below inflation when no one does and math. Or if they do, they fail to show it.
Reply
Old 05-24-2022 | 09:47 AM
  #512  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 0
From: 787 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Andy
I completely agree. I'm just weary of reading comments that the AIP's pay is below inflation when no one does and math. Or if they do, they fail to show it.
There's always a 'vote NO' contingent. That is the narrative they've chosen to get out in front of ALPA. I agree with your point.
Reply
Old 05-24-2022 | 10:00 AM
  #513  
WHACKMASTER's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 7,578
Likes: 288
From: DOWNGRADE COMPLETE: Thanks Gary. Thanks SWAPA.
Default

Originally Posted by Andy
OK, where's the math? We know current pay rates. We've got a picture of 2023 pay rates.
We can easily find what inflation was from Jan 2020 to today.
The only question is what does one estimate inflation at from today to one year past the 2023 pay rate. Please list that.
I haven't bothered crunching the numbers but if you're calling this lost purchasing power, show the math. I want hard facts, not a bunch of IFs and MAYBEs.
FWIW, I'm agnostic on this at the moment.
Listen, I didn’t come here to flame or anything of the sort. At the same time, no I’m not going to provide the math as it’s blatantly obvious that the contract highs of yesteryear have been eroded by inflation and in a big way as of late with no end in sight.

As those of us with some experience in this profession and industry know, a contract is about the sum of its working parts and not just Section 3 pay rates.

Given the current crunch for experienced pilots I was simply hoping that we could extract about a 40% increase to our rates to keep up with inflation and purchasing power.

I wish all of us collectively success in upholding our profession. Last I was told by my company, I’m accepting a 2.7 billion dollar liability every time we push the thrust levers up. By that measure we are GROSSLY under compensated.
Reply
Old 05-24-2022 | 10:04 AM
  #514  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2020
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by AxlF16
There's always a 'vote NO' contingent. That is the narrative they've chosen to get out in front of ALPA. I agree with your point.
Just like ALPA gets out there with shiny videos and pilots to push the yes vote. It goes both ways. The contract should stand on it’s own merits but somehow “we feel”, “time value of money”, “now is not the time”, and “we’ll get ‘em next time” always seems to figure into the conversation.

Hopefully the contract will be presented discussing the changes and that’s it. I seriously doubt that will be the case.
Reply
Old 05-24-2022 | 10:13 AM
  #515  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 5,290
Likes: 111
Default

Originally Posted by togaflaps
Didn't UAL WB CA back around 2005ish top out at like 330 or 340? Just to get back to those rates we'd 470+/HR just to get back to what was once made. I get where we are and what we are coming from with covid but are people really trying to say getting to just over 400/hr a good thing? If those posted pics are real, there better be some major reworks to work rule language for any hope of that passing.
C2000 had about those numbers at the amenable date , 2003 IIRC. But they were never seen.

Rounds 1/2 of concessions happened before that.

WB CA was ~190/hr when it was all said and done.

At least the WB got to keep the rigs, NB didn’t.
Reply
Old 05-24-2022 | 10:32 AM
  #516  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,213
Likes: 14
From: guppy CA
Default

Originally Posted by WHACKMASTER
Listen, I didn’t come here to flame or anything of the sort. At the same time, no I’m not going to provide the math as it’s blatantly obvious that the contract highs of yesteryear have been eroded by inflation and in a big way as of late with no end in sight.

As those of us with some experience in this profession and industry know, a contract is about the sum of its working parts and not just Section 3 pay rates.

Given the current crunch for experienced pilots I was simply hoping that we could extract about a 40% increase to our rates to keep up with inflation and purchasing power.

I wish all of us collectively success in upholding our profession. Last I was told by my company, I’m accepting a 2.7 billion dollar liability every time we push the thrust levers up. By that measure we are GROSSLY under compensated.
Then you need to light a fire under your NC and get them to get you a new contract ASAP. The last word I read was it won't happen until until after the summer at the earliest. Given how you guys are getting JM'd every month, one would think that you could easily be the first out of the gate with that 40% raise.

I'm not solely about section 3; I need to see what the rest of the contract has. I'll accept a few less dollars per hour for a better QOL. Like no forced JMing.
Reply
Old 05-24-2022 | 10:34 AM
  #517  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,590
Likes: 346
Default

Originally Posted by Andy
Then you need to light a fire under your NC and get them to get you a new contract ASAP. The last word I read was it won't happen until until after the summer at the earliest. Given how you guys are getting JM'd every month, one would think that you could easily be the first out of the gate with that 40% raise.

I'm not solely about section 3; I need to see what the rest of the contract has. I'll accept a few less dollars per hour for a better QOL. Like no forced JMing.
Section 3 is black and white. Easy to judge contract on rates and from what I've seen, United set the bar really low.
Reply
Old 05-24-2022 | 10:34 AM
  #518  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 0
From: 787 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by TodKindrsChikun
Just like ALPA gets out there with shiny videos and pilots to push the yes vote. It goes both ways. The contract should stand on it’s own merits but somehow “we feel”, “time value of money”, “now is not the time”, and “we’ll get ‘em next time” always seems to figure into the conversation.

Hopefully the contract will be presented discussing the changes and that’s it. I seriously doubt that will be the case.
Well, since 'ALPA' obviously voted in favor of accepting the TA and sending it to MR it's no surprise the overall push is for a 'yes' vote (assuming that's what happens). There is a mechanism whereby dissenting LEC members (if any) can share their opinions with the pilots. I expect the people that negotiated the TA (and supporting SMEs) to provide their negotiating goals and an honest assessment of where they settled on the continuum. You can call that a sell job if you want, but I don't see any way around this process. Just putting the TA out there with no commentary or explanation will not, and should not, ever happen. Unlike some people, I have faith in the pilot group to fairly and objectively evaluate the TA and vote appropriately. I'm not sure which idealistic, fairytale world has all the pilots that never vote in blocks, or based on personal interests? That's the case in EVERY democratic vote.
Reply
Old 05-24-2022 | 10:35 AM
  #519  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 0
From: 787 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
Section 3 is black and white. Easy to judge contract on rates and from what I've seen, United set the bar really low.
Please share the TA with all of us.
Reply
Old 05-24-2022 | 10:57 AM
  #520  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,561
Likes: 0
From: Captain
Default

Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
Section 3 is black and white. Easy to judge contract on rates and from what I've seen, United set the bar really low.

and there is a delta guy who did not even have a jumpseat authority till late 90s… remember that?
you were getting the jumpseat from all of us but you could not reciprocate GMAFB
your company was the lowest pay for a while but you don’t talk about that
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rickair7777
SkyWest
453
04-20-2020 02:36 PM
shoelu
Major
5
09-03-2015 12:16 PM
ERJ135
American
26
02-26-2013 05:54 PM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JungleBus
Major
121
12-20-2008 04:13 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices