Search

Notices

Agreement In Principle

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-24-2022 | 03:30 PM
  #541  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
Default

At a minimum we should have a “me to” clause to mirror DAL’s negotiated rates. DAL consistently gets the better deal by going second
Reply
Old 05-24-2022 | 04:44 PM
  #542  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 638
Likes: 12
Default

Originally Posted by Monkeyfly
I appreciate the idea that we aren’t just voting on section 3. But there’s nothing wrong with having a personal minimum acceptable level of pay despite what else may be in the contract.

For myself that bare minimum has to keep up with inflation. The APC poll I did seemed to favor that. The FOs I have flown with so far have not supported that.
This implies, to me, that a pay cut would be acceptable to these pilots given enough gains in the rest of the contract. Or maybe they just want any raise as soon as possible.

For reference, the pay raise we would need today is around 13% to break even on spending power from 2019 rates.

Plug in your current pay rate here to see what that would be:

https://www.usinflationcalculator.com
I think the point of looking at the contract as whole is that pay rates aren’t the only thing that define compensation. Generally speaking I don’t really care what my hourly rate is, I care what my take home pay is.

If the hourly rate only increased 5%, but some QOL work rule ended up netting me an extra 5 hours of soft pay per month, it’s not really just a 5% raise. Same goes for extra vacation, or sick accrual, or reimbursements. If all those things increase by a small margin each, but overall I’m taking home 20% more money, what do I care if my pay didn’t go up to match inflation?

To be clear: I have no idea if any of that is actually in the AIP. I’m just backing up the “read the whole thing before you judge” camp.
Reply
Old 05-24-2022 | 08:08 PM
  #543  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 846
Likes: 86
Default Public Maths for Andy

Originally Posted by Andy
You've taken the pay raise, and then added inflation on top of that? I’ve stretched out the pay raise in my updated example in increments of 4%, 4%, 4%, 3%. 15% cumulative.
You're double counting. Touché
Where does May 2020-May2021 come from? I was just trying to use the most current month YoY data. I’ve updated my new numbers to just include the annual inflation averages. All my data comes from the linked website below.

US Inflation Over Time


You've got $352 in Jan 2019. Good for one year, until Jan 2020. You now need to compute inflation from there. 1.8%
The best I can read the number on post #424 is that it's $403.45 on Jan 2023 (add one year and due for a pay raise in Jan 2024).

How much inflation do you show from Jan 2020 through April 2022? I show 12.07%. I don’t exactly know the correct way to calculate cumulative inflation over a given time. The calculator I used showed cumulative over time as 11.7%.
Inflation Calculator


How much inflation are you computing for April 2022 to Jan 2024? 7.5% and 3% for 2022 and 2023, respectively.
That those two numbers and use $352/hr.
April 2022 to Jan 2024 would have to come in at ~2.9% in order for the leaked numbers to be inflation neutral. We don't know the future inflation numbers but that looks a bit low. 2020's annual inflation rate was 1.4%; 2019 was 2.3%.
UAL Pay Raises and Inflation

Jan 2019 - $352

Jan 2020 - $358.34 (1.8% inflation YoY from 2019)

- $372.66 (4% raise)

Jan 2021 - $377.14 (1.2% inflation YoY from 2020)

- $392.22 (4% raise)

Jan 2022 -$410.65 (4.7% inflation YoY from 2021)

- $427.08 (4% raise)

Jan 2023 -$459.11 (7.5% inflation YoY estimated for 2022 - conservative estimate using lowest YoY value from January 2022)

- $472.88 (3% raise)

Jan 2024 - $487.07 (estimated a conservative 3% inflation for 2023)

- given no pay raise.

Cumulative- 15% raise

I’m not trying to create some kind of wet dream for pay rates here. I’d love to hear some feedback because those numbers seem high. But part of me thinks that’s the insidious nature of inflation.

Inflation only maths

Jan 2019 - $352

Jan 2020 - $358.34 (1.8% inflation YoY from 2019)

Jan 2021 - $362.64 (1.2% inflation YoY from 2020)

Jan 2022 -$379.68 (4.7% inflation YoY from 2021)

Jan 2023 - $408.16 (7.5% inflation YoY from 2022)

***Full disclosure: When I use the Inflation calculator, it shows a cumulative inflation rate of 11.7% from 2020 to April 2022. However, my above numbers arrive at 13.9%. In other words, $15 too high. I don’t know why this is. Basically, the 2023 and 2024 numbers above are likely excessive by around $20 to $25.***
Reply
Old 05-24-2022 | 08:30 PM
  #544  
You look like a nail
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by RJDio
Isn’t the ORD council (5?) on an island with the current MEC? I’m surprised their surrogates haven’t enlightened anyone with the AIP highlights or lack thereof.
Council 5 WAS on an island (HNL Council 5). ORD is Council 12 and since I’ve been here, that LEC has been the land of broken toys.
Reply
Old 05-24-2022 | 11:47 PM
  #545  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,213
Likes: 14
From: guppy CA
Default need

Originally Posted by NotMrNiceGuy
***Full disclosure: When I use the Inflation calculator, it shows a cumulative inflation rate of 11.7% from 2020 to April 2022. However, my above numbers arrive at 13.9%. In other words, $15 too high. I don’t know why this is. Basically, the 2023 and 2024 numbers above are likely excessive by around $20 to $25.***
A large part of that is because you've taken the Jan 2019 pay raise (which should have covered inflation for 2019) and then added 1.8% for Jan 2019 to Jan 2020. I'd consider that to be double counting in 2019.

We'd all like a new contract that is well above the inflation rate, but with airlines continuing to post quarterly losses and the Fed needing to do major tightening to get inflation under control, this isn't the best economic environment to negotiate a new contract.
I won't speak for others, but for me, the nonpay portions of the contract are going to be what I look at the closest. My wife and I are in the bottom of the 37% marginal Federal tax bracket so any nonpay enhancements that save me post-tax dollars are worth a lot to me; for each dollar I save, it's worth a bit more than $1.50 in pre-tax wages.
Reply
Old 05-25-2022 | 04:33 AM
  #546  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Andy
A large part of that is because you've taken the Jan 2019 pay raise (which should have covered inflation for 2019) and then added 1.8% for Jan 2019 to Jan 2020. I'd consider that to be double counting in 2019.

We'd all like a new contract that is well above the inflation rate, but with airlines continuing to post quarterly losses and the Fed needing to do major tightening to get inflation under control, this isn't the best economic environment to negotiate a new contract.
I won't speak for others, but for me, the nonpay portions of the contract are going to be what I look at the closest. My wife and I are in the bottom of the 37% marginal Federal tax bracket so any nonpay enhancements that save me post-tax dollars are worth a lot to me; for each dollar I save, it's worth a bit more than $1.50 in pre-tax wages.
Todd, is that you? 🤦‍♂️ are you suggesting we wait until we’re making the largest profits in the history of aviation? Oh wait, we tried that already.

I’ve heard for over 2 decades now that the company will not give us a contract until they want something. Recent history proves this. Merely weeks ago they walked away from the table. All of a sudden we have an AIP. We have unfilled CA vacancies, instructors quitting, and a training debacle. Obviously the company wants something hence the AIP. Finally, we have some leverage.

Go away with your sky is falling rhetoric. Let management worry about managing the budget…unless you are management.
Reply
Old 05-25-2022 | 05:11 AM
  #547  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,213
Likes: 14
From: guppy CA
Default

Originally Posted by Mitch Rapp
Todd, is that you? 🤦‍♂️ are you suggesting we wait until we’re making the largest profits in the history of aviation? Oh wait, we tried that already.

I’ve heard for over 2 decades now that the company will not give us a contract until they want something. Recent history proves this. Merely weeks ago they walked away from the table. All of a sudden we have an AIP. We have unfilled CA vacancies, instructors quitting, and a training debacle. Obviously the company wants something hence the AIP. Finally, we have some leverage.

Go away with your sky is falling rhetoric. Let management worry about managing the budget…unless you are management.
Cool, another 'section 3 only' person.

Last edited by Andy; 05-25-2022 at 05:29 AM.
Reply
Old 05-25-2022 | 06:11 AM
  #548  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
From: iah 73 fo
Default

Originally Posted by Andy
Cool, another 'section 3 only' person.
Add me in !!
Reply
Old 05-25-2022 | 06:28 AM
  #549  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Default

The inflation police the same guys who say we shouldn’t live beyond our means. Asking for a friend. Based on leaks I’m a no. DGAF what the pay rates are.
currently a no based on all other leaked sections
Reply
Old 05-25-2022 | 06:53 AM
  #550  
Sunvox's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,725
Likes: 0
From: UAL retired
Default

Just so folks remember. This Heat Map came out in December. Looks like we might as well vote in another union since they clearly gave up the important stuff early.


Attached Images
File Type: jpg
heatmap.jpg (84.0 KB, 861 views)
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rickair7777
SkyWest
453
04-20-2020 02:36 PM
shoelu
Major
5
09-03-2015 12:16 PM
ERJ135
American
26
02-26-2013 05:54 PM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JungleBus
Major
121
12-20-2008 04:13 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices