Retro will hold up TA
#61
#62
To further that thought, it really doesn't matter what the L-CAL pilots think, or think they want. It is my belief that National ALPA will has a serious hand in looking over any proposal created by this painfully anti-labor, RLA governed process. Not that their (national ALPA's) ability to crystal ball the future is any better than the rest of us, but they need to insure that the majority (read L-UAL) of the pilot group is appeased, or risk certain death. They still have holes in the budget from the loss of the USairways Pilot's dues and are maneuvering like the Medici family to insure no larger group perceives injustice.
Where there's smoke there's fire. I think there may be some validity to the $400 million and 70% to L-UAL. Then throw in the persistent 50% in stock, a hold back until SLI rumor, make it the MEC's responsibility and you're Jeffed.
Where there's smoke there's fire. I think there may be some validity to the $400 million and 70% to L-UAL. Then throw in the persistent 50% in stock, a hold back until SLI rumor, make it the MEC's responsibility and you're Jeffed.
Last edited by Captain Bligh; 09-20-2012 at 04:44 PM.
#63
Banned
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,655
Likes: 0
From: Narrow/Left Wide/Right
Looking like sli will be a dream compared to the more immediate job of deciding where bonus/retro goes and how it will be distributed.
Guess the old saying that a major pilot only cares about:
salary,
seniority,
and sex
but not necessarily in that order.
Cal/Ual might finally answer that order question.
Guess the old saying that a major pilot only cares about:
salary,
seniority,
and sex
but not necessarily in that order.
Cal/Ual might finally answer that order question.
#64
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
where do the numbers come from?
why just 400 million?
Why do CA's get more than FO's. Heck, the FO's are doing all the damn work around here.
The FO's outnumber the Captains around here, so this won't fly, just on the numbers. No way would an FO vote for this. No way would an FO rep at the table vote for it either.
why just 400 million?
Why do CA's get more than FO's. Heck, the FO's are doing all the damn work around here.
The FO's outnumber the Captains around here, so this won't fly, just on the numbers. No way would an FO vote for this. No way would an FO rep at the table vote for it either.
#66
Line Holder
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 943
Likes: 0
From: 747 Captain, retired
Still think the "retro/bonus/whatever" should be divided up in two amounts..............one for CA's and one for FO's............the same amount for ALL CA's and the same for ALL FO's. That way no one can complain about getting cheated. If they start dividing it up based on years/time/work rules/longevity/hours, etc., it could get REAL nasty, and then it will take forever to get this done. JMHO
#67
Keep Calm Chive ON
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,086
Likes: 0
From: Boeing's Plastic Jet Button Pusher - 787
Tax Receivership Implications.....Missed/Post B-Fund Contributions to name just a few in any potential screw job by way of "Bonus".
Wave enough "$0's", there are certainly enough takers to garner 50.1% in any future TA vote......Pathetic.
God, I hope I'm wrong.
#68
Line Holder
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 317
Likes: 1
From: CAP A320
Just a thought, there are some folks, l-ual who fly 80-85 hours and then you have some that fly min hours or less - for whatever reason. Why should they all be "rewarded" the same? but then you have those who are on reserve who work their tails off for 70hrs of pay. I think the best way is a w2 based system but based on ALPA's history they will come up with some method that will screw us all.
#69
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
It really depends on how big your own big issue is.
For me, my one big issue is scope. After that my one big issue is compensation, After that my one big issue is retro-pay.
All three of my "single issues" are important to me.
The new FAR's will take care of most of the domestic scheduling stuff combined with UAL's work rules. Our CAL-slaveship work-rules will thankfully go away.
But, like the abortion debate. It's either a live person in the womb or it's not. This contract will either be a POS or it won't. That single issue, is like so many other single issues. Black/white....whatever.............
ALPA better not screw me! How's that for a single issue?
#70
HOSED BY PBS AGAIN
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,713
Likes: 0
Just a thought, there are some folks, l-ual who fly 80-85 hours and then you have some that fly min hours or less - for whatever reason. Why should they all be "rewarded" the same? but then you have those who are on reserve who work their tails off for 70hrs of pay. I think the best way is a w2 based system but based on ALPA's history they will come up with some method that will screw us all.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



