Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
Union Email pertaining to UPA extension >

Union Email pertaining to UPA extension

Search

Notices

Union Email pertaining to UPA extension

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-07-2015 | 11:27 AM
  #11  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 33
From: 777 CA
Default

Originally Posted by El10
Im confused, the letter clearly states NSNB flown by mainline. How in the word is that mis intuerpted into giving scope away?
1-C-1-g Number of 76-Seat Aircraft
If the Company adds New Small Narrowbody aircraft to the Company Fleet, then on or after January 1, 2016, the number of permitted 76-Seat Aircraft may increase from 153 (as permitted under Section 1-C-1-a-(2)-(c)) up to a total of 223 76-Seat Aircraft, and the number of permitted 76/70-Seat Aircraft may increase from 255 (as permitted under Section 1-C-1-a-(2)-(c)) up to a total of 325 76/70-Seat Aircraft, except that once the number of 76/70-Seat Aircraft exceeds 255, then the number of 70-Seat Aircraft may not be more than 102. 76-Seat Aircraft (above 153 such Aircraft) may be added on a one 76- Seat Aircraft for each one and one quarter New Small Narrowbody Aircraft (1:1.25) ratio (rounded to the closest integer). In addition, in the event more than 153 76-Seat Aircraft are in United Express Flying, the Company shall remove from United Express Flying a number of 50-Seat Aircraft determined as follows:
Reply
Old 10-07-2015 | 11:56 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by UALinIAH
1-C-1-g Number of 76-Seat Aircraft
If the Company adds New Small Narrowbody aircraft to the Company Fleet, then on or after January 1, 2016, the number of permitted 76-Seat Aircraft may increase from 153 (as permitted under Section 1-C-1-a-(2)-(c)) up to a total of 223 76-Seat Aircraft, and the number of permitted 76/70-Seat Aircraft may increase from 255 (as permitted under Section 1-C-1-a-(2)-(c)) up to a total of 325 76/70-Seat Aircraft, except that once the number of 76/70-Seat Aircraft exceeds 255, then the number of 70-Seat Aircraft may not be more than 102. 76-Seat Aircraft (above 153 such Aircraft) may be added on a one 76- Seat Aircraft for each one and one quarter New Small Narrowbody Aircraft (1:1.25) ratio (rounded to the closest integer). In addition, in the event more than 153 76-Seat Aircraft are in United Express Flying, the Company shall remove from United Express Flying a number of 50-Seat Aircraft determined as follows:
And your point is?
Reply
Old 10-07-2015 | 12:03 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by El10
And your point is?
The point is that the company needs narrow body lift desperately and they don't want to buy the only 100-seaters, E190s or CS100/300s, that would contractually allow more UAX E175s. Getting mainline 100-seaters protects us from further outsourcing down the road so obliging the company would be detrimental United pilot job security and options especially at the bottom of the list.
Reply
Old 10-07-2015 | 12:23 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,561
Likes: 0
From: Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Flytolive
The point is that the company needs narrow body lift desperately and they don't want to buy the only 100-seaters, E190s or CS100/300s, that would contractually allow more UAX E175s. Getting mainline 100-seaters protects us from further outsourcing down the road so obliging the company would be detrimental United pilot job security and options especially at the bottom of the list.


Did the MEC passed the agenda today to entertain the extension ...or not ....anyone knows
Reply
Old 10-07-2015 | 01:31 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,508
Likes: 109
Default

Originally Posted by Flytolive
The point is that the company needs narrow body lift desperately and they don't want to buy the only 100-seaters, E190s or CS100/300s, that would contractually allow more UAX E175s. Getting mainline 100-seaters protects us from further outsourcing down the road so obliging the company would be detrimental United pilot job security and options especially at the bottom of the list.
Reply
Old 10-07-2015 | 01:34 PM
  #16  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,282
Likes: 0
From: A320 Cap
Default

Originally Posted by Thor
Yes it's obvious that the company probably doesn't want to be constrained by the contract they signed and will most likely try to weasel out of the NSNB clause anyway they can.

My contention is that any relief is WAY more valuable than a mid-course pay adjustment. It's not called scope-CHOKE for nuthin'.

One solution is for the company to buy more narrow body airplanes which clearly would help the capacity problem and offer job security to those pilots near the bottom of the list. There's no reason for pilots to give away scope, or even relax it, for the company to take the "buy more lift" path. There truly isn't anything preventing them from bringing more mainline aircraft into the system.
I'm quite curious to see what the offer is, but I agree that any section 1 give would be an absolute non-starter. I'm very confident that our MEC feels the same way. They can ask all they want (as they did with the used A319 buy), but the answer is and will always be NOOOO
Reply
Old 10-07-2015 | 01:36 PM
  #17  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,282
Likes: 0
From: A320 Cap
Default

Originally Posted by Grumble
Hahahhah!! I was thinking the same thing! But I figured I must have missed something that everyone else got
Reply
Old 10-07-2015 | 01:39 PM
  #18  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,282
Likes: 0
From: A320 Cap
Default

Originally Posted by Flytolive
The point is that the company needs narrow body lift desperately and they don't want to buy the only 100-seaters, E190s or CS100/300s, that would contractually allow more UAX E175s. Getting mainline 100-seaters protects us from further outsourcing down the road so obliging the company would be detrimental United pilot job security and options especially at the bottom of the list.
Ok after reading this 5 times I think I know where you're going. No chance in HE// that our MEC is going to allow used A319's or 737's to increase the number of E175's at express. It's one of the basic fundamental tenants of our Section 1. The company's offer includes a firm order for some sort of C100/300, E190/195. Or maybe the Superjet or MRJ. It's NOT the A319 or 737 used market.
Reply
Old 10-07-2015 | 04:41 PM
  #19  
Saabs's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,450
Likes: 0
From: Airbus button pusher
Default

What are you guys group I rates currently ? Hope they are a lot better than ours at AA!
Reply
Old 10-07-2015 | 05:28 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,112
Likes: 0
From: SFO Guppy CA
Default

I will vote NO if there is ANY gives in Scope!!! I don't care what kind of pay raise they're willing to give us.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
APC225
United
1
02-23-2019 05:16 AM
Sunvox
Union Talk
172
06-02-2015 09:22 AM
Tennstatelaw
Cargo
72
05-12-2012 09:41 AM
YXnot
Major
1077
02-18-2011 09:17 PM
vagabond
Union Talk
2
01-15-2009 11:15 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices