Alaska Air Hiring
#3901
Banned
Joined APC: Apr 2017
Posts: 627
But no, AS is going to spend the next decade wasting a tremendous amount of capital and opportunity cost to stay the same size it is today.
So yes, AS is parking planes. Don't ever use this spin again.
#3902
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2018
Posts: 692
You guys suck at math. Parking planes and replacing them is still parking planes. All those aircraft could have been IN ADDITION to the existing fleet.
But no, AS is going to spend the next decade wasting a tremendous amount of capital and opportunity cost to stay the same size it is today.
So yes, AS is parking planes. Don't ever use this spin again.
But no, AS is going to spend the next decade wasting a tremendous amount of capital and opportunity cost to stay the same size it is today.
So yes, AS is parking planes. Don't ever use this spin again.
#3903
Thank you! This has always baffled me. It’s like the Boeing fan boys would rather have a stagnant airline than operate the bus. Why do people hate the bus so much? I just don’t get it.
Several ULCC’s operate the bus very profitably. If AS management can’t figure it out, that’s on them. Personally, I’d take the growth all day long. Wasn’t that the point of acquiring VX anyway?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
#3904
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 325
That’s what they claimed but in reality it was a kill job in order to prevent jet blue and VX from becoming another formidable opponent to as. They now are shrinking back to whats comfortable for them which is literally only Washington State and Oregon.
They could have bought Vx and ran with the acquired growth and added organic growth into the mix to become an actual airline with a real route structure. Instead the credit card company that flies a few planes known has Alaska airlines tanked a massive opportunity and cowers away in hiding until the next kill job will need to come in order to survive. My monies on Hawaiian as both will be hurting from Southwest... although the smartest play would be a three way merger of AS B6 and HA but that would be way too much to handle for the brilliant minds in Seattle.
They could have bought Vx and ran with the acquired growth and added organic growth into the mix to become an actual airline with a real route structure. Instead the credit card company that flies a few planes known has Alaska airlines tanked a massive opportunity and cowers away in hiding until the next kill job will need to come in order to survive. My monies on Hawaiian as both will be hurting from Southwest... although the smartest play would be a three way merger of AS B6 and HA but that would be way too much to handle for the brilliant minds in Seattle.
Thank you! This has always baffled me. It’s like the Boeing fan boys would rather have a stagnant airline than operate the bus. Why do people hate the bus so much? I just don’t get it.
Several ULCC’s operate the bus very profitably. If AS management can’t figure it out, that’s on them. Personally, I’d take the growth all day long. Wasn’t that the point of acquiring VX anyway?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Several ULCC’s operate the bus very profitably. If AS management can’t figure it out, that’s on them. Personally, I’d take the growth all day long. Wasn’t that the point of acquiring VX anyway?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
#3905
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 936
Thank you! This has always baffled me. It’s like the Boeing fan boys would rather have a stagnant airline than operate the bus. Why do people hate the bus so much? I just don’t get it.
Several ULCC’s operate the bus very profitably. If AS management can’t figure it out, that’s on them. Personally, I’d take the growth all day long. Wasn’t that the point of acquiring VX anyway?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Several ULCC’s operate the bus very profitably. If AS management can’t figure it out, that’s on them. Personally, I’d take the growth all day long. Wasn’t that the point of acquiring VX anyway?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
A “hip” West Coast vibe?
Which is apparently a major factor in AS not getting trounced in Hawaii. Now I’m even more scared for my future than before.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
#3906
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Posts: 647
For the love of god, can we leave the market planning and number crunching to the people who's job that is, and get back to complaining about what actually sucks here on a day to day, and I do mean EVERY day, basis? I have NEVER in my life seen schedules that are such a heaped and steaming coil of 6am reports, 1159pm finishes with two days off and then another 6am report, 6 day blocks, two on two off two on two off, etc. We truly live to work now at this airline.
Who gives two ******** about what SWA is doing? I already know I would rather work there than here for a lot of reasons, not least of which is their likely continued success, but the most pressing of which is definitely the fact that my life has been ruined by Alaska's crappy trips and their archaic line bidding.
Who gives two ******** about what SWA is doing? I already know I would rather work there than here for a lot of reasons, not least of which is their likely continued success, but the most pressing of which is definitely the fact that my life has been ruined by Alaska's crappy trips and their archaic line bidding.
Last edited by echelon; 03-07-2019 at 05:42 PM. Reason: oops wrong thread. still applies
#3908
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Posts: 983
Rapid growth is dangerous. We are getting rid of unfavorable lease rates. No one said SWA was stupid for selling their 717s to Delta. Single fleet types are more profitable for airlines of our size.
Why is anyone worried? If our mangement is wrong and we fail we get bought. Since we have the worst contact in the industry, the company that buys us is bound to have a better one. Enjoy the ride.
Why is anyone worried? If our mangement is wrong and we fail we get bought. Since we have the worst contact in the industry, the company that buys us is bound to have a better one. Enjoy the ride.
#3909
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2006
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 2,370
Every pilot at my airline, including myself, all prefer deadheading on small airbus vs 737. If everything else is about equal, here is my booking preference for single-aisle:
A220
ERJ-170/190
757
A319/32X
ERJ-195
737
CRJ 7/9
CRJ
Small ERJ
And, if I'm on a short flight, I would rather fly a CRJ7/9 than a 737...
I like Alaskan, overall, but now try and avoid them, because of the 737, and it seems that they are almost no different than any other carrier.
A220
ERJ-170/190
757
A319/32X
ERJ-195
737
CRJ 7/9
CRJ
Small ERJ
And, if I'm on a short flight, I would rather fly a CRJ7/9 than a 737...
I like Alaskan, overall, but now try and avoid them, because of the 737, and it seems that they are almost no different than any other carrier.
I had an interesting experience the other night while flying our only red nosed Boeing in the fleet. During boarding, the A flight attendant had to reassure multiple pax that it was a Boeing a/c and not an Airbus. At least 5 different times, pax started complaining as soon as they saw the red paint. For whatever reason they associated the red fuselage with the red lettering on the old VX Airbus’ and were not happy about it. This kinda throws a wrench into the argument that pax prefer the Airbus to the Boeing.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post