Search

Notices

Us/aa sli

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-21-2012 | 04:15 PM
  #51  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by KillingMeSmalls
I assume most of you guys know this, but the SLI legislation, known as the McCaskill-Bond statute, was signed into law in December 2007 and is codified at 49 U.S.C. § 42112.

If this does happen it will be seen as a merger and will most likely be slotted by equipment. Not to sound condescending, but it was just killing me to read some of these posts.
Well, how many SLI's have occured in the last 5 years.......or are still being worked out ?

Do the UAL/CAL, DAL/NWA, U/AWA or SWA/Air Tran SLI's for example, all mimick each other or do they have variables based on the specifics of the individual situation ?

"Fair and equitable" is a loose and subjective concept. Ask 20 pilots and you'd get 20 different answers. Get an opinion from 5 different arbitrators and you'd get 5 results not identical. We're post M-B with all thse situations and none are identical.

Personally, on AA/U we're getting worked up a bit prematurely here on this issue, if you ask me.
Reply
Old 04-21-2012 | 08:28 PM
  #52  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Likes: 0
Default

This is far from done but it is fun to speculate. The west would like to see a relative position integration with protection on the widebody's for the Aa guys long enough to give most Aa an oppurtunity to fly the birds they brought. The east pilots want DOH and your 777 manuals ASAP
Reply
Old 04-21-2012 | 09:37 PM
  #53  
Flies With The Hat On
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,339
Likes: 0
From: Right of the Left Seat
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
You have got to be kidding me! You want this deal at Delta? Managment will sign it tomorrow. My goals are way more then a couple of percent more then our current rates and I think you should set your sights a lot higher also. 3 percent is not going to cut it. Not even close.
The increase of scope is a bigger problem than pay.
Reply
Old 04-21-2012 | 11:08 PM
  #54  
texaspilot76's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,458
Likes: 0
From: Right Seat
Default

In my opinion, anyone furloughed, including those choosing not to accept recall, need to be stapled below all active pilots. Layoff is layoff. All active pilots need to be integrated on a relative seniority basis. If you chose not to accept recall, then that was a gamble that you took. if you were not on property at time of merger, then you should start out below all active pilots.
Reply
Old 04-22-2012 | 12:13 AM
  #55  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Bill Lumberg
It's up to the creditors and the judge mainly. Boeing and Airbus are happy that the orders for 73's and 319s are still intact. And notice they keep the politicians happy by keeping HQ in DFW, saving up to 6000 jobs compared to the AMR plan, and keep the AA name.
Evidently they aren't keeping all the politicians happy, particularly the ones in DFW.... These guys must stand something to lose in all of this


Fort Worth Chamber, Dallas Regional Chamber Issue Joint Statement on American Airlines Takeover Bid - Yahoo! Finance

FORT WORTH, Texas, April 20, 2012 /PRNewswire/ -- The Fort Worth Chamber and Dallas Regional Chamber – the two largest Chambers in the region – held full board meetings Thursday and Friday mornings, and the subject of American Airlines was discussed.*
Following those meetings, Fort Worth Chamber President and CEO Bill Thornton and Dallas Regional Chamber President and CEO Amb. James C. Oberwetter wish to speak as a single voice on the subject:
We are greatly concerned by the potential impact that American's union employees' support of U.S. Airways' intentions could have on both the bankruptcy proceedings and the local economy, and are opposed to any mergers prior to American exiting bankruptcy.* While it may seem to some that this is an option, it's actually a damaging distraction that will disrupt American's thoughtful process already in place to preserve the most jobs in Dallas/Fort Worth, and the state of Texas, both now and once American has exited bankruptcy.
American Airlines' brand equity stands alone. Aviation is a legacy industry in our region, and American's headquarters in Fort Worth and presence at DFW Airport brings international recognition to North Texas. The company has provided jobs for generations of residents who live in communities all across the region.* In addition, American Airlines has benefited dozens of communities with charitable contributions.* A merger risks losing all that, and more.
The best outlook for all American employees is for the airline to remain independent and headquartered in North Texas. We urge the creditors and unions working with American to not be distracted by the efforts of other carriers to disrupt the proceedings.* Allow the bankruptcy process to run its course.* American's management has the exclusive right to submit a plan of reorganization until late September.* Completing this essential step is in the best interests of American's employees, creditors, Fort Worth, Dallas and all the communities served by American Airlines.*
Reply
Old 04-22-2012 | 12:15 AM
  #56  
Jack Bauer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,357
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by aa73
It depends by what you mean by "out of seniority."

IMO, they are not flying CA out of seniority. Here's why: TWA CA jobs are protected under the terms of Supplement CC, which guarantees a certain number of CA jobs in STL based on a ratio of DFW and ORD CA jobs. If DFW/ORD CA jobs go up, so do STL CA jobs. If they shrink, so does STL.

So, in essence, TWA pilots have their own seniority list in STL. A pilot hired at TWA in 1988 carries around a 7500 AA seniority number, and has the seniority to fly as CA but only based out of STL, the protected cell. Otherwise, a 7500 seniority at AA is approx. 2000 numbers away from holding an AA CA position anywhere else in the system.

That's why you'll hear some natives whining about them flying out of seniority. They aren't. They are simply upgrading based on their protected seniority list.

Approximately 1100 TWA pilots got slotted in at 1:8 (1 TWA pilot per 8 AA pilots) and approx. 1300 TWA pilots got stapled representing about 46% integrated, 54% stapled. The TWA Date of Hire cutoff between integrated vs stapled is 1989.
The TWA guys got railroaded plain and simple. Trying to rewrite history with lame justifications when AA is now in BK is in extremely bad form. The AA guys took advantage of the TWA guys. The same thing just happened to Airtran guys. Some in this industry always will given the chance to strongarm their brothers.
Reply
Old 04-22-2012 | 02:18 AM
  #57  
CVG767A's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,190
Likes: 0
From: 767ER capt
Default

Originally Posted by cactiboss
This is far from done but it is fun to speculate. The west would like to see a relative position integration with protection on the widebody's for the Aa guys long enough to give most Aa an oppurtunity to fly the birds they brought. The east pilots want DOH and your 777 manuals ASAP
That's funny! I don't care who you are. Funny, and probably accurate.
Reply
Old 04-22-2012 | 02:47 AM
  #58  
Quint's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
From: Captain, SS Orca
Default

Originally Posted by texaspilot76
In my opinion, anyone furloughed, including those choosing not to accept recall, need to be stapled below all active pilots. Layoff is layoff. All active pilots need to be integrated on a relative seniority basis. If you chose not to accept recall, then that was a gamble that you took. if you were not on property at time of merger, then you should start out below all active pilots.
Well thankfully it doesn't and will never work that way. What your talking about would be changing the seniority of pilots within their own group. Not only is that wrong, it would be lawsuit city.
Reply
Old 04-22-2012 | 04:01 AM
  #59  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Quint
Well thankfully it doesn't and will never work that way. What your talking about would be changing the seniority of pilots within their own group. Not only is that wrong, it would be lawsuit city.
So let's take a guy at Ual ( 747 captain) that took the voluntary furlough and staple him because his airline merged while he was out. Makes no sense.
Reply
Old 04-22-2012 | 04:47 AM
  #60  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Default

Good luck nobody's going to buy it. AA is no where close to the carrier it was. It not to late for Usair to shore up the funding to make an out right buy out for AA. TWA pilots supported Usair East. They hated to hear that " we bought you" argument to screw pilots out of seniority they even got a bill passed to protect this from happening again. Come to terms with the irony in this. AA is not much different then where TWA was look at what it been like for career exp compared to the guys at Cal and Swa. APA referred to the TWA pilots as kmart and AA was Saks . A disgrace to every airline pilot. I think USair will hammer APA on this.


need to hammer APA on this. Good luck to you both !
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EWR73FO
United
5
03-16-2012 08:04 AM
bull
Southwest
172
07-27-2011 11:49 AM
FlyJSH
Regional
666
05-22-2011 05:43 PM
Aloha
Regional
75
06-12-2010 06:15 PM
Myboyblue
Mergers and Acquisitions
8
04-29-2010 07:39 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices