Atlas Air Hiring
#8581
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Posts: 264
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Or, as happened last year, they would start a 747 class on Monday and a 767 class on Tuesday with the sole intent of preventing individuals from having the opportunity to select equipment type.
![](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/clear.gif)
#8582
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Posts: 112
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Unfortunately I am pretty sure that is how they are going to fill all 747 slots going forward and keep 767 guys from transferring over. Nothing in the contract preventing this to keep training cost down.
#8583
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Sorry, I don't follow. Once the seat locks expire, how exactly would they prevent 767 guys from bidding over? The example he gave was for new-hire classes.
#8584
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
![Big Grin](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
#8585
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Well, anything is possible. Especially, if you guys read the latest email from Carlson. They want cooperation and "flexibility" yet a Chief Pilot position opens up and from what I understand there was NO vacancy announcement. Wouldn't you think that with a seniority list of over 1000 that someone, MAYBE, would have liked to at least interview for the position?????
Even if they still picked the x-Delta guy at least they would have done the politically correct thing of interviewing candidates. But instead bring in this guy (not saying he's not qualified) who hasn't seen ACMI/CMI non-scheduled ops. Kinda of a kick in the groin when they are wanting cooperation, don't ya think?
![Mad](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/smilies/mad.gif)
Even if they still picked the x-Delta guy at least they would have done the politically correct thing of interviewing candidates. But instead bring in this guy (not saying he's not qualified) who hasn't seen ACMI/CMI non-scheduled ops. Kinda of a kick in the groin when they are wanting cooperation, don't ya think?
#8586
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Even so, in a "normal" year we lose 50+ to retirements/attrition, and we all know attrition is going to spike this year.
They can delay, but probably not by much.
#8587
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I agree. I think the amount of 747 open time for both CAs and FOs is pretty telling. They'd have to hire enough before the seat locks start expiring (big group in September and October on the FO side) to not only catch up to the lack of staffing on that side, but overstaff it. I just don't see it happening, but of course, I've said that before in this industry.
#8589
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Hope something desired in the next contract is a realistic seat lock time like other airlines have. 3 is excessive.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post