Search

Notices

Reserve for Dummies

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-18-2024 | 12:03 PM
  #1711  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,206
Likes: 0
From: DAL FO
Default

Originally Posted by Herkflyr
Agreed. This is a very disturbing trend. This PR day issue, if true as depicted (and I don't see any reason to believe otherwise) is as black and white outrageous as if some rogue payroll supervisor decided that our pay rates were too high, and therefore we were all getting shorted $50 an hour going forward--just because.

I strongly suspect that someone real high up on the management side had some serious buyers' remore about our contract and sometime in the past few months issued a "call to arms" to find any issue, real or mostly imagined, to try and scrape back a few pennies from the pilot group. Bad, bad policy that should backfire spectacularly.
The PR to PB thing has always been because of icrew’s inability to keep rolling the PR…so instead of fixing the root problem (probably correct to the letter of the pwa) they’re going to go back and unwind history?

I can say for certain there have been times I WOULD NOT have picked up that extra trip if it wasn’t on a PB day (thus generating premium and more PB’s). Will have to go audit I guess.

Can’t say this kind of crap doesn’t make me just want to let ARCOS go, particularly on weekends or the middle of the night. Short sighted witch hunt just when the op is getting back up on step. Great idea.
Reply
Old 05-18-2024 | 12:45 PM
  #1712  
Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,502
Likes: 501
Default

So I'm not sure where we stand, is this a change in the status quo, or is that only a thing if we do it and it impacts the company?
Reply
Old 05-18-2024 | 03:25 PM
  #1713  
FangsF15's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 8,352
Likes: 1,374
Default

Originally Posted by ancman
I think it goes beyond a single rogue middle manager. Management has always had some degree of contempt for us. The difference is they used to respect the MEC, PWA, and pilot group.

Only about 4 years ago, Ed called the MEC (chaired by RS at the time) the “Most difficult MEC he has ever worked with.” They hammered out some good deals for the pilot group during the Covid era, all while fully protecting the PWA.

We’ve come a long way since then. The current MEC simply doesn’t have management’s respect. We’re seeing the consequences almost continuously.
Agree wholeheartedly.
Reply
Old 05-18-2024 | 03:43 PM
  #1714  
Line Holder
Veteran: Navy
5 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 1,191
Likes: 339
Default

Originally Posted by FangsF15
Agree wholeheartedly.
So back to hat’s off…
Reply
Old 05-18-2024 | 03:53 PM
  #1715  
Roll’n Thunder
Community Influencer
15 Years
On Reserve
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,174
Likes: 584
From: Pilot
Default

Originally Posted by SideStickMonkey
So back to hat’s off…
Some people never stopped…
Reply
Old 05-18-2024 | 04:46 PM
  #1716  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,105
Likes: 155
From: Big ones
Default

Originally Posted by tennisguru
Some people never stopped…
they never wanted to fix iCrew until they saw how it could save money. Someone must have driven to work in a brand new red corvette (obscure reference caution).
Reply
Old 05-18-2024 | 06:06 PM
  #1717  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 139
Likes: 3
From: Standing by for MOAD downgrade...
Default

Originally Posted by crewdawg
So I'm not sure where we stand, is this a change in the status quo, or is that only a thing if we do it and it impacts the company?
I thought status quo only applied during contract negotiations.
Reply
Old 05-18-2024 | 06:48 PM
  #1718  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 925
Likes: 82
From: B737 FO
Default

Originally Posted by crewdawg
So I'm not sure where we stand, is this a change in the status quo, or is that only a thing if we do it and it impacts the company?
Maybe I'm way off here but this definitely seems like grounds for a change in the status quo to me. Although it seems like it is usually a one-way street.

Changing the policy going forward would be bad enough, but retroactively removing pay from pilots after unilaterally and silently changing, a what, 20-25 year past practice? Anyone know how long iCrew has used PRs?
Reply
Old 05-19-2024 | 02:30 PM
  #1719  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2022
Posts: 874
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by BlueSkies
Maybe I'm way off here but this definitely seems like grounds for a change in the status quo to me. Although it seems like it is usually a one-way street.

Changing the policy going forward would be bad enough, but retroactively removing pay from pilots after unilaterally and silently changing, a what, 20-25 year past practice? Anyone know how long iCrew has used PRs?
gheee, I wonder what would happen if no one picked up those GS calls since they don’t want to pay the pilots for them… sometimes management needs to learn the hard way to not mess with peoples pay
Reply
Old 05-31-2024 | 09:23 AM
  #1720  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2022
Posts: 381
Likes: 56
Default

How frequently does the Reserve Required formula change the number of reserves required? My category went from 21 required tomorrow to 12 during today's noon PCS run. (Today is the 31st, with tomorrow beginning a new month.)

Last edited by TALPAtalker; 05-31-2024 at 09:24 AM. Reason: clarity
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BestForward
JetBlue
14679
Yesterday 12:58 AM
Heavyflyer
FedEx
21
04-11-2021 09:13 AM
GoJet Recruiter
GoJet
165
05-21-2018 10:51 AM
Flytolive
United
714
01-12-2016 03:54 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices