![]() |
|
Originally Posted by Alan Shore
(Post 1620703)
Couldn't he do the same thing in a single bid group by requesting the slide as a range of -5 to -1, and asking for all of his desired days off as his next-highest priority? PBS should then slide the vacation as far as possible, given any unstacking, and then award him as many of the surrounding days off that he can hold.
There are a few ways to meet the original posters needs. What you say will work but if his x day requests will be determined by and vary depending on the amount of slide he gets, his bid will not allow the same specificity as using else start next. Remember he may want use X-days at other points in the month. The above method may take 6 X-days in addition to vacation to ensure the desired off period, while else start next will always require the least possible X-days for a given time off because you can address every possible permutation of vacation slide plus surrounding X-days. Scoop :) |
Originally Posted by Splash
(Post 1620089)
Just had the exact same thing happen to me! The agent said there was no way I could sit in the cockpit. I asked to speak with the captain. He didn't understand it either. I had to get him to look in the FOM, and verify that all it takes is a valid Delta ID, and "1P" on a boarding pass. He had to go up to the podium to convince the agent.
The agent was angry. The captain was angry. I was angry. All for different reasons. Delta IT is the weakest link. |
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 1620672)
I heard that the A321 cant do transcons without a 150 kt tailwind and blocking off 70 seats and even then no alternate.
|
Originally Posted by scambo1
(Post 1620477)
IOW, taking your above statement to the extreme, we would fly a single mothership daily to Europe. In all seriousness, this is kind of where we're headed. As the Great ER Purge concludes (and the Great ER Expansion of 2007-2009 has long been unwound) the trend is solidly in the corner of big planes to EU hubs and dumping people off to our "partners" from there. And even then they get the majority of it. :mad: Looking at what's on order and in the RFP, its all bigger than the ER. Coupled with the business model trend going forward, and its very clear that we will be flying biger planes with fewer pilots per passenger ratio to EU hubs and the days of "all points foreign" in 200 seaters is long gone. |
Originally Posted by gloopy
(Post 1620803)
Much like the bumblebee paradox, the 321 isn't supposed to be able to do a transcon. But since its an Airbus, at cruise the upwind engine shuts down automatically (because the plane thinks its landing) and that's the only way it can correct enough yaw to get certified for its 10 kt max X-wind (gust factor inclusive) landing limitation, and it ends up saving a lot of fuel that way. As long as the tail stays on.
|
Originally Posted by badflaps
(Post 1620740)
I hear that there is a mod in the works for drop tanks. When you hit a reporting point it will say TCI fast/slow/nope to DPTNK yes/no/exploded and what state you dropped it off. I plan to drop the tanks west of BHM. |
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 1620813)
Not drop tank, drop tail.
When you hit a reporting point it will say TCI fast/slow/nope to DPTNK yes/no/exploded and what state you dropped it off. I plan to drop the tanks west of BHM. |
Hey, I'm curious if any category has "Open Reserve Days" available for reserves to bid for more pay in a reserve month. I've seen a fair amount of green slips go out and yet I've seen no more reserve days available. Obviously that's fine with with me, I'm just curious if/why the company is not availing itself to this option.
So, does your category show any "Open Reserve Days" available for reserves to bid for the rest of April? Seattle A330A----------None Denny |
Questioned answered
|
Originally Posted by gloopy
(Post 1620803)
Much like the bumblebee paradox, the 321 isn't supposed to be able to do a transcon. But since its an Airbus, at cruise the upwind engine shuts down automatically (because the plane thinks its landing) and that's the only way it can correct enough yaw to get certified for its 10 kt max X-wind (gust factor inclusive) landing limitation, and it ends up saving a lot of fuel that way. As long as the tail stays on.
http://theaviationist.com/wp-content...Tailstrike.png http://img638.imageshack.us/img638/5527/newimageb.jpg Examples of 737-900 CG shift tank in operation, that's a lot of shift First, the wing only supports half the weight of the aircraft, the tail skid supports the other half until almost cruise speed. Second, the FC Passengers are fed bran flakes and high fiber meals. This results in a transfer of weight in cruise to an aft mounted tank after TOC, reducing tailplane angle of incidence and thus induced drag. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:21 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands