![]() |
|
Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver
(Post 1647012)
I know some people like them. It gives the time at home during the day to do whatever they want/need and then they get their sleep during the CDO. I don't care how many people like them... it still doesn't make them safe!
And okay, I'll buy (to an extent) the argument that we already do other types of flying that mess with our sleep cycles. I'm with you on the 30 hour layovers and converting a late night cycle to an early morning cycle. I don't like that either but it's a lot more doable than trying to exist on 3 or 4 hours of sleep on a CDO or series of CDO's. We already have trips at Delta that provide challenges to getting proper rest. Let's not add more trips that are even worse. CDO's are worse. Why are we selling out safety? :mad: In other news, Junior A330 FO at US was just awarded to a May 2013 hire. Dang. |
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1647018)
To each their own, really. A trip with 3 or 4 630am sign-ins is very fatiguing for me. A trip with all late flying that ends at 2-3 in the morning kills other people and is absolutely ideal for me.
Circadian Rhythm Disorders: Shift Work, Jet Lag, and More Delayed Sleep Phase Syndrome - What It Is And How To Treat It Another interesting study, rats that were denied any restorative sleep for many days, simply died. Any time you cut into the natural restorative sleep cycle you start asking for health and safety issues. Sleep deprivation in the rat: III. Total sleep depriva... [Sleep. 1989] - PubMed - NCBI "Ten rats were subjected to total sleep deprivation (TSD) by the disk apparatus. All TSD rats died or were sacrificed when death seemed imminent....No anatomical cause of death was identified. All TSD rats showed a debilitated appearance, lesions on their tails and paws, and weight loss in spite of increased food intake. Their yoked control (TSC) rats remained healthy." |
worse trips for me were the four days.
and specifically the ones that had you do the last flight in and then again the next night but to a min rest overnight and now do a 6am and then 545am to a 13 hour duty day. i hated those. i like far 117. |
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 1647034)
worse trips for me were the four days.
and specifically the ones that had you do the last flight in and then again the next night but to a min rest overnight and now do a 6am and then 545am to a 13 hour duty day. i hated those. i like far 117. ...says that guy that boned up his bid and got 3 5-days in June. Come on, PCS! |
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 1647034)
worse trips for me were the four days.
and specifically the ones that had you do the last flight in and then again the next night but to a min rest overnight and now do a 6am and then 545am to a 13 hour duty day. i hated those. i like far 117. Another one that will beat you up...the folks based in LAX/SEA get toasted with the 2AM (PST) wakeup in NYC. It doesn't matter if you got in at 5PM (PST), the body wont fall asleep as your eyes dart back and forth at the clock for several hours. Not good...just like getting too little rest on CDO's. |
Does MEMRAT mean member ratification?
|
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1647009)
Ahhhh the mythical staffing formula. Is that the same one that allows categories to be woefully understaffed year after year?
I don't believe it really exists. It is merely cocaine to placate the masses. (us) I like the new T... |
I do see one implication of allowing CDOs could possibly make the rest of the trip makeups better.
The trips have just been awful since 117 implementation. I see that as a potential positive of allowing them. |
Originally Posted by Hrkdrivr
(Post 1647057)
Does MEMRAT mean member ratification?
Or as one of the forum's most frequent posters refers to it: "memory rat." :D |
Originally Posted by Hrkdrivr
(Post 1647057)
Does MEMRAT mean member ratification?
I like memory rat. That's a good ipad correction. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:05 AM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands