![]() |
|
...although it’s far more dramatic to voluntarily answer the 404 area code call while on an airport sit and then rage on social media about being ‘forced’ to fly something that wasn’t on your original rotation.
|
Why did my tablet just download 717 dig, and the 756 dig if im not going to either plane?
|
Originally Posted by Stryder
(Post 2714136)
Why did my tablet just download 717 dig, and the 756 dig if im not going to either plane?
;) |
Originally Posted by Stryder
(Post 2714136)
Why did my tablet just download 717 dig, and the 756 dig if im not going to either plane?
There are two kinds of EFBs - those with DIGs and those without: :D https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s2w9X_tHU7k |
Originally Posted by Stryder
(Post 2714136)
Why did my tablet just download 717 dig, and the 756 dig if im not going to either plane?
|
[QUOTE=Gunfighter;2713597]
You also have an obligation to check you schedule on an X day. This discussion is about what happens during the first minute coming off your last X day. But while you are on it there is no debate about this. Zero obligation while on an X day. Full stop. Bottom line, no matter how sympathetic you are to the company and crew scheduling But speaking of the company's perspective, why on earth would they not simply hack out a free memo that says "unless you hear otherwise from CS, you will automatically be released at 6PM going into an X day"? Or at least an "if on long call" version of that? What possible gain would they get from putting themselves in a position to miss an obvious 30 hour break trying to get 6 more hours of an unusable 12 hour callout going into an X day and then creating a legality issue for rest for the next period? |
Originally Posted by Gunfighter
(Post 2713597)
You also have an obligation to check you schedule on an X day.
From the Scheduling reference handbook (page 96). A reserve pilot: • on an X day has no obligation to respond to an attempted contact by the Company or to be in a position to report for an inverse assignment. |
Originally Posted by gloopy
(Post 2714371)
There is no way this can be true. You have zero obligation of any kind on an X day.
Ha! Hardly. I hope I'm wrong about this because that would mean whenever they forget to mark R and annotate a specific 30 hour period, then you'd only have 24, and would still be owed another 30. That's fine with me! From the ALPA 117 guide: Q-78. Does the 30 consecutive-hour rest have to be prospectively identified? For example, could a rest less than 30 hours be extended to satisfy the 30-hour requirement? A-78. No. A rest period must be prospective in nature which means the flightcrew member must be told in advance that he/she will be on a rest period for a specified duration. The flightcrew member must be told before the rest period begins that he/she will be receiving a 30-hour rest to comply with Part 117. But speaking of the company's perspective, why on earth would they not simply hack out a free memo that says "unless you hear otherwise from CS, you will automatically be released at 6PM going into an X day"? Or at least an "if on long call" version of that? What possible gain would they get from putting themselves in a position to miss an obvious 30 hour break trying to get 6 more hours of an unusable 12 hour callout going into an X day and then creating a legality issue for rest for the next period? |
Originally Posted by gloopy
(Post 2714371)
There is no way this can be true. You have zero obligation of any kind on an X day.
This discussion is about what happens during the first minute coming off your last X day. But while you are on it there is no debate about this. Zero obligation while on an X day. Full stop. Ha! Hardly. I hope I'm wrong about this because that would mean whenever they forget to mark R and annotate a specific 30 hour period, then you'd only have 24, and would still be owed another 30. That's fine with me! But speaking of the company's perspective, why on earth would they not simply hack out a free memo that says "unless you hear otherwise from CS, you will automatically be released at 6PM going into an X day"? Or at least an "if on long call" version of that? What possible gain would they get from putting themselves in a position to miss an obvious 30 hour break trying to get 6 more hours of an unusable 12 hour callout going into an X day and then creating a legality issue for rest for the next period? Denny |
My head is swimming here, and I am normally a reserve pilot.
Maybe this question will help someone, or perhaps it will just show my ignorance. Why would scheduling assign rest that begins on day prior to an X day (say starting at 2000) and the reserve rest display shows that rest terminating at 0219 on the X day? Seeing that could lead one to believe that the X day itself was not rest. And would a single screen display of rest periods—including X or * day rests—help unmuddy the waters? |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:33 AM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands