Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html)

beernutt 11-25-2018 03:32 PM

...although it’s far more dramatic to voluntarily answer the 404 area code call while on an airport sit and then rage on social media about being ‘forced’ to fly something that wasn’t on your original rotation.

Stryder 11-26-2018 06:38 AM

Why did my tablet just download 717 dig, and the 756 dig if im not going to either plane?

DeadStick 11-26-2018 08:07 AM


Originally Posted by Stryder (Post 2714136)
Why did my tablet just download 717 dig, and the 756 dig if im not going to either plane?

I don’t know. Did you file a grievance?

;)

Scoop 11-26-2018 10:57 AM


Originally Posted by Stryder (Post 2714136)
Why did my tablet just download 717 dig, and the 756 dig if im not going to either plane?




There are two kinds of EFBs - those with DIGs and those without: :D


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s2w9X_tHU7k

gloopy 11-26-2018 12:29 PM


Originally Posted by Stryder (Post 2714136)
Why did my tablet just download 717 dig, and the 756 dig if im not going to either plane?

Are you sure you didn't have a percentage bid lying around...

gloopy 11-26-2018 12:57 PM

[QUOTE=Gunfighter;2713597]

You also have an obligation to check you schedule on an X day.
There is no way this can be true. You have zero obligation of any kind on an X day.

This discussion is about what happens during the first minute coming off your last X day. But while you are on it there is no debate about this. Zero obligation while on an X day. Full stop.



Bottom line, no matter how sympathetic you are to the company and crew scheduling
Ha! Hardly. I hope I'm wrong about this because that would mean whenever they forget to mark R and annotate a specific 30 hour period, then you'd only have 24, and would still be owed another 30. That's fine with me!

But speaking of the company's perspective, why on earth would they not simply hack out a free memo that says "unless you hear otherwise from CS, you will automatically be released at 6PM going into an X day"? Or at least an "if on long call" version of that?

What possible gain would they get from putting themselves in a position to miss an obvious 30 hour break trying to get 6 more hours of an unusable 12 hour callout going into an X day and then creating a legality issue for rest for the next period?

crewdawg 11-26-2018 01:41 PM


Originally Posted by Gunfighter (Post 2713597)
You also have an obligation to check you schedule on an X day.

You absolutely do NOT have an obligation to check your schedule or answer your phone on an X day.

From the Scheduling reference handbook (page 96).


A reserve pilot:

• on an X day has no obligation to respond to an attempted contact by the Company or to be in a position to report for an inverse assignment.

bugman61 11-26-2018 02:10 PM


Originally Posted by gloopy (Post 2714371)
There is no way this can be true. You have zero obligation of any kind on an X day.

Correct. The only thing that happens on an X day is the company has a chance to shorten your notification window on your first day from 12 to 10 hours if they get an assignment on your schedule by 9 hours prior to the end.



Ha! Hardly. I hope I'm wrong about this because that would mean whenever they forget to mark R and annotate a specific 30 hour period, then you'd only have 24, and would still be owed another 30. That's fine with me!
You are wrong. And you say here exactly why it’s wrong without realizing it. For a 30/168 break you have to have a specific rest period that is at least 30 hours, designated when you start the rest period. You can’t extend it from 24 to 34 and have it count. When you go into a single X day it’s only 24 hours when it starts. Your schedule has you going back on call the next day at midnight. Adding 10 hours if they give you an assignment doesn’t meet the requirements of the regs.

From the ALPA 117 guide:


Q-78. Does the 30 consecutive-hour rest have to be prospectively identified? For example, could a rest less than 30 hours be extended to satisfy the 30-hour requirement?
A-78. No. A rest period must be prospective in nature which means the flightcrew member must be told in advance that he/she will be on a rest period for a specified duration. The flightcrew member must be told before the rest period begins that he/she will be receiving a 30-hour rest to comply with Part 117.
And if you still don’t believe it, call scheduling and ask a supervisor if a single X day plus a 10 hour window on your first on call day counts as a 30/168 break.


But speaking of the company's perspective, why on earth would they not simply hack out a free memo that says "unless you hear otherwise from CS, you will automatically be released at 6PM going into an X day"? Or at least an "if on long call" version of that?

What possible gain would they get from putting themselves in a position to miss an obvious 30 hour break trying to get 6 more hours of an unusable 12 hour callout going into an X day and then creating a legality issue for rest for the next period?
I agree. It would make sense to have an automatic release 6 hours prior to a single X day. There already is early release prior to hard non flying days. My guess is that they want to keep the flexibility to roll your days if needed. My experience has been that they are very good at making sure they turn any 24 hour breaks on my schedule into 30 rest periods.

Denny Crane 11-26-2018 02:32 PM


Originally Posted by gloopy (Post 2714371)
There is no way this can be true. You have zero obligation of any kind on an X day.

This discussion is about what happens during the first minute coming off your last X day. But while you are on it there is no debate about this. Zero obligation while on an X day. Full stop.

You are correct in that you don't have an obligation to check your schedule on an X day but be ready for that call at 0001 if you don't.



Ha! Hardly. I hope I'm wrong about this because that would mean whenever they forget to mark R and annotate a specific 30 hour period, then you'd only have 24, and would still be owed another 30. That's fine with me!
Not entirely true. Say you have 1 golden day in between to groups of 4 days on call. If you are not used on the last on call day prior to the golden day you are automatically released at 1200 so you will have 36 hours in rest. This is NOT true of a regular X day. CS will not necessarily put an R on your schedule but you will have a 36 hour rest period that satisfies the requirement. How do I know this? Personal experience and a call to CS.


But speaking of the company's perspective, why on earth would they not simply hack out a free memo that says "unless you hear otherwise from CS, you will automatically be released at 6PM going into an X day"? Or at least an "if on long call" version of that?
See above.


What possible gain would they get from putting themselves in a position to miss an obvious 30 hour break trying to get 6 more hours of an unusable 12 hour callout going into an X day and then creating a legality issue for rest for the next period?
If it's a regular X day they should call and put you into 30hr rest prior to the X day. If they don't then it's on them.

Denny

buckleyboy 11-26-2018 04:19 PM

My head is swimming here, and I am normally a reserve pilot.
Maybe this question will help someone, or perhaps it will just show my ignorance.
Why would scheduling assign rest that begins on day prior to an X day (say starting at 2000) and the reserve rest display shows that rest terminating at 0219 on the X day?
Seeing that could lead one to believe that the X day itself was not rest.

And would a single screen display of rest periods—including X or * day rests—help unmuddy the waters?


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:33 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands