Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html)

tsquare 05-24-2011 08:07 PM


Originally Posted by poostain (Post 998230)
2 month's? man poor suckers!!! i am completing month 4 begining of june.
They are sending me to re-establish currency because im well past the 90 days.

Although it would be fun to go with you to FCO i'm fine waiting this out as long as they let me:D

I'd enjoy the vacation too...

LuvJockey 05-24-2011 08:29 PM


Originally Posted by newKnow (Post 998228)
Um Jockey,

You honestly don't think that it will go to arbitration?

This is where you unquestionably display a lack of being able to put yourself into someone else's shoes.

If you were an Air Tran SLI negotiator, would you want to make any concession beyond relative seniority, only to have your entire pilot group blame you for them not getting their vacation, their weekends off, their great layover in AUA, or their base at home in LAS, for your entire career?

Even though you wish they would concede and bypass arbitration, it's not happening, my friend. Their negotiators would rather lay all the blame at the foot of the arbitrator -- so do yours.

Here's a bit of advice: Sit back,relax, enjoy the ride, don't take it so personal, and when you get real queasy, research previous arbitrator rulings and try to find awards that merged seniority lists based on W2 earnings and expectations.

Make sure you have a lot of time and a really powerful search engine for the last one. ;)

Nope, I don't think that arbitration is the end game. Too many bad things that can happen even when you think that you've won. The problem with researching arbitration opinions is that most of the biggies have been done based on ALPA policy. Alpa policy is much more specific, but hasn't been any more successful in the USAir fiasco. The Republic/F9 merger had an award that is being sued over already. I think that I read somewhere that United is getting ready to decertify their union. I think that the reason the Delta/NWA agreement went so well is that the NWA guys had been beat down enough that they accepted a crummy deal.

Anyway, none of those previous ALPA policy based Relative seniority cases have anything to do with a four-party arbitration involving SWAPA, AT ALPA, SWA Management, and AT new management. SLI does not cover pay scales, bidding rules, or other major contract points, nor does it say anything other than "IF you are going to combine seniority lists, this is the one that you'll use."

That is why I believe we'll see a negotiated or mediated agreement made, and why it is critical to have a mediator involved that would become an arbitrator if the negotiations collapse.

hockeypilot44 05-24-2011 08:30 PM

As someone who has been benched twice in the last 3 years, I can tell you it's everything I thought it would be. I'm going to keep switching aircraft as much as possible to try for it again, especially when we really start hiring.;)

tsquare 05-24-2011 08:32 PM


Originally Posted by LuvJockey (Post 998244)
Nope, I don't think that arbitration is the end game. Too many bad things that can happen even when you think that you've won. The problem with researching arbitration opinions is that most of the biggies have been done based on ALPA policy. Alpa policy is much more specific, but hasn't been any more successful in the USAir fiasco. The Republic/F9 merger had an award that is being sued over already. I think that I read somewhere that United is getting ready to decertify their union. I think that the reason the Delta/NWA agreement went so well is that the NWA guys had been beat down enough that they accepted a crummy deal.

Anyway, none of those previous ALPA policy based Relative seniority cases have anything to do with a four-party arbitration involving SWAPA, AT ALPA, SWA Management, and AT new management. SLI does not cover pay scales, bidding rules, or other major contract points, nor does it say anything other than "IF you are going to combine seniority lists, this is the one that you'll use."

That is why I believe we'll see a negotiated or mediated agreement made, and why it is critical to have a mediator involved that would become an arbitrator if the negotiations collapse.

Wanna bet a cold one on it?

newKnow 05-24-2011 08:57 PM


Originally Posted by LuvJockey (Post 998244)
Nope, I don't think that arbitration is the end game. Too many bad things that can happen even when you think that you've won. The problem with researching arbitration opinions is that most of the biggies have been done based on ALPA policy. Alpa policy is much more specific, but hasn't been any more successful in the USAir fiasco. The Republic/F9 merger had an award that is being sued over already. I think that I read somewhere that United is getting ready to decertify their union. I think that the reason the Delta/NWA agreement went so well is that the NWA guys had been beat down enough that they accepted a crummy deal.

Anyway, none of those previous ALPA policy based Relative seniority cases have anything to do with a four-party arbitration involving SWAPA, AT ALPA, SWA Management, and AT new management. SLI does not cover pay scales, bidding rules, or other major contract points, nor does it say anything other than "IF you are going to combine seniority lists, this is the one that you'll use."

That is why I believe we'll see a negotiated or mediated agreement made, and why it is critical to have a mediator involved that would become an arbitrator if the negotiations collapse.

Ok. If you say so. But, I really don't think an Air Tran guy/gal is going to attach his name to a decision that will subject him to abuse for the rest of his career.

As far as a mediator switching to put an arbitrators hat on, it's highly unlikely. It defeats the purpose of the mediator.

I have no idea where you are coming from with the NWA guys were beat down so much they accepted a crummy deal thing either.

JABDIP 05-24-2011 09:05 PM


Originally Posted by LandGreen2 (Post 998075)
hey guys/gals...need to see a beach with the kids ages 9,11. either drive from the ATL; or fly to a non rev friendly location. of course, interline discounts always welcome.

any good trip reports out there?
thx

Destin, Fl is a great spot. Will be crowded though.:)

NuGuy 05-24-2011 09:34 PM

http://images16.fotki.com/v316/photo...llBGone-vi.jpg

Carl Spackler 05-24-2011 09:40 PM


Originally Posted by LuvJockey (Post 998244)
Nope, I don't think that arbitration is the end game. Too many bad things that can happen even when you think that you've won.

OK. How do you plan on getting around McCaskill-Bond?


Originally Posted by LuvJockey (Post 998244)
I think that the reason the Delta/NWA agreement went so well is that the NWA guys had been beat down enough that they accepted a crummy deal.

Totally false. NWA pilots didn't "accept" any deal. We accepted arbitration. Which means we agreed to abide by whatever the arbitrator decided. DAL pilots proffered a ratio integration. NWA pilots proffered Date of Hire. NWA pilots lost. The SLI was a ratio.

Carl

80ktsClamp 05-24-2011 09:57 PM


Originally Posted by Carl Spackler (Post 998266)
OK. How do you plan on getting around McCaskill-Bond?



Totally false. NWA pilots didn't "accept" any deal. We accepted arbitration. Which means we agreed to abide by whatever the arbitrator decided. DAL pilots proffered a ratio integration. NWA pilots proffered Date of Hire. NWA pilots lost. The SLI was a ratio.

Carl

Both lost, actually. DL proffered category/status... much larger number of bigger planes on the DL side pre-merger. Splitting hairs, though :). Such is a merger/acquisition.

The FL/WN thing has me with a bag of popcorn though. There is zero way of anyone winning in that. The FL guys lose their seats and get stapled feeling the luv.... and anything other than that and the fluf-drivers feel they got hosed.

acl65pilot 05-25-2011 01:18 AM

Volcanic ash to force Berlin airport closures

BERLIN (AP) -- A cloud of volcanic ash that has caused headaches for air travelers spread to Germany on Wednesday, forcing the closure of Berlin's airport and threatening to disrupt European flights for days. Some airlines complained the closures were an overreaction.

The cloud forced the cancellation of hundreds of flights over Britain on Tuesday as winds blew the ash from Iceland's Grimsvotn volcano over Scotland, but British authorities said high-level densities of ash had cleared their airspace on Wednesday and there were only scattered cancellations, mostly related to Germany-bound flights.

German air traffic control said Wednesday they would halt all flights to and from Berlin's Tegel and Schoenefeld airports, starting at 11:00 a.m. (0900GMT). Airports in Bremen, Hamburg and Luebeck, have already been closed for hours, causing hundreds of flights to be stuck.

While experts say particles in the ash could stall jet engines and sandblast planes' windows, many argue the flight bans are a massive overreaction by badly prepared safety regulators.

A British Airways test flight passing through the affected area was unaffected, said Willie Walsh, the chief executive of International Airlines Group -- formed from the merger of BA and Iberia.

"We flew in the red zone for about 45 minutes at different altitudes over Scotland" and the north of England, Walsh told BBC radio. "All the filters were removed and will be sent to a laboratory for testing. The simple answer is that we found nothing."

Irish budget airline Ryanair has also challenged the results, saying Tuesday it had sent its own airplane into Scottish airspace and found no ash in the atmosphere.

But, German transport minister Peter Ramsauer insisted the precautions were justified, and said that authorities were better prepared after the Eyjafjallajokull volcano eruption last year forced the closure of European air space for five days, stranding millions.

"We have developed a very refined regulation since the big ash cloud last April," Ramsauer told ARD public broadcaster. "We are much better prepared to handle such a situation."

Last year, European aviation authorities closed vast swaths of European airspace as soon as they detected the presence of even a small amount of volcanic ash in the atmosphere. This year, they are trying a more sophisticated approach.

Aviation authorities will give airlines information detailed information about the location and density of ash clouds. Any airline that wants to fly through the ash cloud can do so, if it can convince its own national aviation regulators it is safe.

Officials in Iceland have said the amount of ash being released by the volcano is decreasing, and do not expect the disruption to be as bad as last year. The Grimsvotn volcano began erupting on Saturday, sending clouds of ash high into the air.

The main international body representing carriers, the International Air Transport Association, complained to the British government Tuesday about the way it had handled the issue, saying it should have had Cessna planes ready to carry out tests, instead of relying on the weather service.

Associated Press writer Raphael G. Satter contributed to this report from London.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:40 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands