Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html)

forgot to bid 03-19-2012 07:01 PM

I'm sure airliners.net has some insight into this, but man reading through all of the crap that their 17 year olds post there is obnoxious.

W0X0F 03-19-2012 07:41 PM


Originally Posted by forgot to bid (Post 1154623)
I'm sure airliners.net has some insight into this, but man reading through all of the crap that their 17 year olds post there is obnoxious.

Unlike some of the sage prose on this forum?

LeineLodge 03-19-2012 07:43 PM


Originally Posted by Scoop (Post 1154620)
I will leave you with this farfetched, yet possible thought. DAL could purchase these planes put them in service, take a mainline fleet snapshot affecting our RJ's numbers and then get rid of them or other mainline aircraft - and I believe the allowed RJ numbers do not adjust down. Probable- Hell No! But disturbingly - allowed per our stellar Scope.
Scoop

This was one of the big items I wrote in on my survey. It's BS that we have a one way check valve on our scope. In the absence of recapturing OUR scope, the amount of "permitted aircraft" should at least rise AND fall with the mainline count. To set a new high water mark that does not subsequently recede is no good.

80ktsClamp 03-19-2012 08:23 PM


Originally Posted by forgot to bid (Post 1154623)
I'm sure airliners.net has some insight into this, but man reading through all of the crap that their 17 year olds post there is obnoxious.

How stupid do they have to be to think that we would trade them out 737-700s? Ours do seem to be quite resistant to rolling all the way down large hills near runways in ATL, so that might be appealing.

Bill Lumberg 03-19-2012 08:43 PM


Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp (Post 1154682)
How stupid do they have to be to think that we would trade them out 737-700s? Ours do seem to be quite resistant to rolling all the way down large hills near runways in ATL, so that might be appealing.


I think Delta has noticed that the A319s can do the same job as the 737-700, just look at all of the replacements to Latin America and Caribbean routes from Atlanta.

80ktsClamp 03-19-2012 08:44 PM


Originally Posted by Bill Lumberg (Post 1154687)
I think Delta has noticed that the A319s can do the same job as the 737-700, just look at all of the replacements to Latin America and Caribbean routes from Atlanta.

Hopefully they notice more. One look at the ATL bid pack speaks that they don't know what to do with fifi.

gloopy 03-19-2012 09:14 PM


Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp (Post 1154682)
How stupid do they have to be to think that we would trade them out 737-700s? Ours do seem to be quite resistant to rolling all the way down large hills near runways in ATL, so that might be appealing.

We only have 10...

9 of them. It wouldn't surprise me if, in the event DL got 80+ 717's, that a good percentage (maybe even all) ended up being fleet replacements. 20 DC9's, 10 73-7's, a handful of 73-8's, a bunch of sold 73-8 orders and some 319/320 retirements would provide opportunity for continued "capacity discipline" because we wouldn't want to disrupt the massive order books of the LCC's or anything. We just have to keep shrinking faster than they grow to keep the profits up (until we get into the region of reverse command, but by then its some other bonus monger's problem).

buzzpat 03-19-2012 09:16 PM


Originally Posted by RockyBoy (Post 1154369)
I know a couple of JetBlue guys that did that. They are not planning on coming back, but are smart enough to know that they should keep an avenue open as long as they possibly can.

Yeah, I know a guy who now flies for FDX whose been kicking the can as long as he can so he can use his benefits to non-rev. He goes around the world.

forgot to bid 03-20-2012 04:39 AM


Originally Posted by W0X0F (Post 1154654)
Unlike some of the sage prose on this forum?

Tis true. We do get high schoolers from time to time that seem to regurgitate stuff dad said. You can kind of smoke them out pretty fast because there are gaping holes in their comments. It's one thing to be on an aviation enthusiast website and it's another to be on a pilot only one.

Right now I think there are one or two posting here that are not Delta pilots but are trying to pass themselves off as Delta pilots for the sake of stoking some fires. They may be pilots but they're probably not Delta pilots, they're just sock puppets.

Which I admit, it takes one to know one! :D Yes, I'm somewhat proud to say I've destroyed a few UGA football threads in my time playing the disgruntled alumnus who says all the right things to help the clueless come unglued. I've even argued with myself to prove my legitimacy. :D

But just to be clear, non Delta pilots are obviously welcome here because the more the merrier. But if they pass themselves off as one and are here just to start arguments and fights, well, eventually they'll reveal themselves.

orvil 03-20-2012 04:45 AM


Originally Posted by Bill Lumberg (Post 1154687)
I think Delta has noticed that the A319s can do the same job as the 737-700, just look at all of the replacements to Latin America and Caribbean routes from Atlanta.

I agree with 80kts, they don't know what to do with Fifi. I think they are sorry they put a base in ATL. It will not grow any further.

Crew Resources says that it doesn't have IFE. Passenger feedback is that they want IFE. So, the Carribean flying is very limited. Most of it will stay with the 737.

Of course, this is DAL, the plan may change at any moment.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:35 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands