Details on Delta TA
05-04-2015 | 12:10 PM
#3801
Line Holder
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
From: Capt
Jerry, I just went through training. They are doing fine. We talked a long time ago about this and you said they would not even be able to hire 100 a month. They are hiring in excess of that number now. They are going off sight for some training but most of that will be brought back in house with the addition of a 737 and a330 sim. Nobody in the training department was talking or acting like a big crises is looming.
I am presently in the schoolhouse and my newhire training partner checked out the newest class. The newest class is half the size of his class due to the lengthening time it is taking to get the newhires a training slot. As it is, some newhires are waiting weeks between indoc and airplane school due to a full training schedule.
Miami simulators are being used by DAL with no talking about winding that down even after the new 737 sims are certified by the FAA.
LP
05-04-2015 | 02:22 PM
#3802
Straight QOL, homie
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,202
Likes: 1
From: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
I'm doing a dick dance, dealing with our absolutely embarrassing dental plan.
I bet RA doesn't have coverage with these clowns. And why not? Because he negotiated something better. He didn't negotiate to solve the company's problems; he negotiated to solve his own problems.
Maybe we should consider doing the same.
I bet RA doesn't have coverage with these clowns. And why not? Because he negotiated something better. He didn't negotiate to solve the company's problems; he negotiated to solve his own problems.
Maybe we should consider doing the same.
05-04-2015 | 07:20 PM
#3803
Doing Nothing
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,316
Likes: 0
Jerry, I just went through training. They are doing fine. We talked a long time ago about this and you said they would not even be able to hire 100 a month. They are hiring in excess of that number now. They are going off sight for some training but most of that will be brought back in house with the addition of a 737 and a330 sim. Nobody in the training department was talking or acting like a big crises is looming.
05-04-2015 | 08:22 PM
#3804
Wind the clock beoch
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
I still don't think we are going to get a quick contract as I have posted in the past. It is however looking more possible. Here is a prediction. When the contract comes out you will declare it woefully inadequate and start your usual name calling campaign ect.
The rest of your fellow pilots will evaluate the contract, read it carefully, attend road shows and make intelligent well thought out choices when voting. It will pass and you will up your name calling for those who voted yes.
The rest of your fellow pilots will evaluate the contract, read it carefully, attend road shows and make intelligent well thought out choices when voting. It will pass and you will up your name calling for those who voted yes.
05-04-2015 | 08:26 PM
#3805
Runs with scissors
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 7,847
Likes: 0
From: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
And you, predictably, will vote yes. After extolling how you carefully evaluated it, blah, blah, blah...you might even be against it initially, say it won't pass, then change course and wholeheartedly support it, all the while castigating those who are against it as whiners, name callers, etc... sound familiar?
05-05-2015 | 03:09 AM
#3806
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,877
Likes: 194
And you, predictably, will vote yes. After extolling how you carefully evaluated it, blah, blah, blah...you might even be against it initially, say it won't pass, then change course and wholeheartedly support it, all the while castigating those who are against it as whiners, name callers, etc... sound familiar?
None of the BS posted about contract 2012 on here came to pass.
05-05-2015 | 03:32 AM
#3807
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,503
Likes: 0
Particularly that BS sales line of "We will never see the 3-3. Trust us. [wink wink and we signed a confidentiality agreement]."
05-05-2015 | 03:52 AM
#3808
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,877
Likes: 194
I am curious. Where and who told you that. The only place I ever saw it was here. It was never in any Union material and was not mentioned at the road show I attended.
05-05-2015 | 03:54 AM
#3809
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,877
Likes: 194
If someone did mention it maybe it was because the thought the 4 and 3 in the last two years would turn out better with PS. What's it actually ending up is something like 20.8% in year 2 and 23% minimum in the last year.
05-05-2015 | 05:28 AM
#3810
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 799
Likes: 0
I am curious. Where and who told you that. The only place I ever saw it was here. It was never in any Union material and was not mentioned at the road show I attended or in talking directly with one of the negotiators.
If someone did mention it maybe it was because the thought the 4 and 3 in the last two years would turn out better with PS. What's it actually ending up is something like 20.8% in year 2 and 23% minimum in the last year.
If someone did mention it maybe it was because the thought the 4 and 3 in the last two years would turn out better with PS. What's it actually ending up is something like 20.8% in year 2 and 23% minimum in the last year.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
