DAL Class drops
#1231
The point I was making is that Delta is leading the pack when it comes to financial performance. They are not perfect and there is room for improvement but pointing out that United does something might not be proof positive that it's a good idea. I have no idea what method is more lucrative.
#1232
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,273
The combined category is way more lucrative. They could do away with almost all the reserve pilots in the 765 category. Not sure how many that is, but it wouldn't be insignificant. Delta would love to have it one category, but to do so would require us to bring the ER rates up the the 765 rates which they won't do.
#1233
Are United's cockpit setups all common with the newer PD and ND? I heard this is a real point of emphasis with the FAA. Makes differences much easier to teach. analog dial vs. electronic tape displays for speed altitude, nav etc. Learning cues for both during critical phases of flight was the reason for the analog glass SWA has on their new 737s. Or so I was told.
#1234
Are United's cockpit setups all common with the newer PD and ND? I heard this is a real point of emphasis with the FAA. Makes differences much easier to teach. analog dial vs. electronic tape displays for speed altitude, nav etc. Learning cues for both during critical phases of flight was the reason for the analog glass SWA has on their new 737s. Or so I was told.
#1235
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,674
The T.V. (PFD/MFD/ND/EICAS) in front the pilots can be configured to draw the cartoons in a variety of ways. It's just software that can be told how to show it.
You can make a conventional PFD/MFD/ND screen look like a traditional/old school "six pack"/round dial/steam gage's, etc.
Round dial airspeed indicator/altimeter/full DG/HSI/VSI as opposed to speed/alt tapes, etc.
As mentioned, when SW was taking new 73's "back in the day" they were configured that way.
You can google image it to get an idea.
https://goo.gl/images/o2cgKh
You can make a conventional PFD/MFD/ND screen look like a traditional/old school "six pack"/round dial/steam gage's, etc.
Round dial airspeed indicator/altimeter/full DG/HSI/VSI as opposed to speed/alt tapes, etc.
As mentioned, when SW was taking new 73's "back in the day" they were configured that way.
You can google image it to get an idea.
https://goo.gl/images/o2cgKh
#1236
The T.V. (PFD/MFD/ND/EICAS) in front the pilots can be configured to draw the cartoons in a variety of ways. It's just software that can be told how to show it.
You can make a conventional PFD/MFD/ND screen look like a traditional/old school "six pack"/round dial/steam gage's, etc.
Round dial airspeed indicator/altimeter/full DG/HSI/VSI as opposed to speed/alt tapes, etc.
As mentioned, when SW was taking new 73's "back in the day" they were configured that way.
You can google image it to get an idea.
https://goo.gl/images/o2cgKh
You can make a conventional PFD/MFD/ND screen look like a traditional/old school "six pack"/round dial/steam gage's, etc.
Round dial airspeed indicator/altimeter/full DG/HSI/VSI as opposed to speed/alt tapes, etc.
As mentioned, when SW was taking new 73's "back in the day" they were configured that way.
You can google image it to get an idea.
https://goo.gl/images/o2cgKh
#1237
Are United's cockpit setups all common with the newer PD and ND? I heard this is a real point of emphasis with the FAA. Makes differences much easier to teach. analog dial vs. electronic tape displays for speed altitude, nav etc. Learning cues for both during critical phases of flight was the reason for the analog glass SWA has on their new 737s. Or so I was told.
The 767-400 is the 777 displays. The FAA requires proficiency in the 400 every three months. CAs have to have a landing or complete online training if last flight was outside 3 mos. FOs have to be flying with a current CA. They are then qualified after that flight. It's kind of a goat rope and that is why the plane is relegated to DCA and EWR.
#1238
All 757-200/300 and 767-300s have the same displays with speed and ALT tape as well as an FMA. Only minor differences in the FD.
The 767-400 is the 777 displays. The FAA requires proficiency in the 400 every three months. CAs have to have a landing or complete online training if last flight was outside 3 mos. FOs have to be flying with a current CA. They are then qualified after that flight. It's kind of a goat rope and that is why the plane is relegated to DCA and EWR.
The 767-400 is the 777 displays. The FAA requires proficiency in the 400 every three months. CAs have to have a landing or complete online training if last flight was outside 3 mos. FOs have to be flying with a current CA. They are then qualified after that flight. It's kind of a goat rope and that is why the plane is relegated to DCA and EWR.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post