Flow confirmed
05-19-2021 | 07:04 PM
#113
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
From: 25A
05-19-2021 | 07:43 PM
#114
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 2,902
Likes: 92
At least let him buy you a coffee. It make him feel better, and you don't have to spend the next year paying the interest from the CC. Be reasonable.
05-19-2021 | 09:07 PM
#115
On Guard!
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 1,181
Likes: 0
Also, he's laughing because he's the worst OO troll. Like, he's bad at it. He's not entertaining at all.
OO trolls in order of entertainment value
1. brockenspectre (sorry, Meow)
2. captive apple
3 - 5799. almost everyone else
5800. (I must have missed somebody)
5801. LAXtoDEN
OO trolls in order of entertainment value
1. brockenspectre (sorry, Meow)
2. captive apple
3 - 5799. almost everyone else
5800. (I must have missed somebody)
5801. LAXtoDEN
Knock our BrokenSpectator down to 3-6 (sympathy credit included), and replace 1 with MercysGhost. Neither held a trolling candle to mpet or RayJay as far as entertainment went, but both do a pretty okay with an OO handicap credit. It’s only fair.
05-20-2021 | 12:22 AM
#116
In a land of unicorns
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 7,045
Likes: 63
From: Whale FO
Quoting myself to correct myself on a portion of this:
[There is a provision that says that if Compass flow rights ceases to exist, Delta, DALPA, Compass have to meet to discuss "whether continuation or modification of [the] LOA would be appropriate". I think Delta will just say no continuation or modification is needed. Taking this literally, they can satisfy this just by having a meeting and doing nothing.]
Reading more into it....I take back this statement. "Any continuation...will require the agreement of Delta, Compass, and the Association". Again, this will come down to "is this latent ambiguity in the context of the situation"? Since Compass no longer exists- how can they meet in regards to continuing the LOA? Isn't that latent ambiguity in itself? If so, intent matters- what was the intent, to allow Compass pilots to continue to possibly have a flow after the sale of Compass? Or was it to allow a flow-down elsewhere or limit scope?
This clause will be important too- if it's determined to be unambiguous it's taken literally and DALPA wins. If not, Delta could win. I don't think it's as clear-cut as either side makes it out to be.
[There is a provision that says that if Compass flow rights ceases to exist, Delta, DALPA, Compass have to meet to discuss "whether continuation or modification of [the] LOA would be appropriate". I think Delta will just say no continuation or modification is needed. Taking this literally, they can satisfy this just by having a meeting and doing nothing.]
Reading more into it....I take back this statement. "Any continuation...will require the agreement of Delta, Compass, and the Association". Again, this will come down to "is this latent ambiguity in the context of the situation"? Since Compass no longer exists- how can they meet in regards to continuing the LOA? Isn't that latent ambiguity in itself? If so, intent matters- what was the intent, to allow Compass pilots to continue to possibly have a flow after the sale of Compass? Or was it to allow a flow-down elsewhere or limit scope?
This clause will be important too- if it's determined to be unambiguous it's taken literally and DALPA wins. If not, Delta could win. I don't think it's as clear-cut as either side makes it out to be.
Here is a direct quote from an arbitrator in a decision. This should show what is wrong with your analysis:
"What first needs to be said is that the burden of proof, as with any contract grievance, is with the Association. What it must prove is not that the Company's view is wrong, but that ALPA's view is correct".
By definition, the company is always correct, unless the association can prove, past reasonable doubt, that they are correct. That is a very tough task on something that has even slight ambiguities, because those ambiguities are always ruled for the company.
05-20-2021 | 12:23 AM
#117
Porco Rosso
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 2,522
Likes: 0
Niner I propose an amendment -
Knock our BrokenSpectator down to 3-6 (sympathy credit included), and replace 1 with MercysGhost. Neither held a trolling candle to mpet or RayJay as far as entertainment went, but both do a pretty okay with an OO handicap credit. It’s only fair.
Knock our BrokenSpectator down to 3-6 (sympathy credit included), and replace 1 with MercysGhost. Neither held a trolling candle to mpet or RayJay as far as entertainment went, but both do a pretty okay with an OO handicap credit. It’s only fair.
05-20-2021 | 02:52 AM
#119
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
From: 25A
Niner I propose an amendment -
Knock our BrokenSpectator down to 3-6 (sympathy credit included), and replace 1 with MercysGhost. Neither held a trolling candle to mpet or RayJay as far as entertainment went, but both do a pretty okay with an OO handicap credit. It’s only fair.
Knock our BrokenSpectator down to 3-6 (sympathy credit included), and replace 1 with MercysGhost. Neither held a trolling candle to mpet or RayJay as far as entertainment went, but both do a pretty okay with an OO handicap credit. It’s only fair.
1) Making your self look like a total mental midget
2) Completely de-railing threads with your drivel
What is pretty funny is, both you and Niner have yet to notice the complete irony of these "troll ranking posts". You both hijacked a totally legit thread and infected it with your moronic babble. Making your Endeavor co-workers and union proud!
05-20-2021 | 02:54 AM
#120
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
From: 25A
Niner, you seem like a decent guy....you are letting meow drag you down into a whole knew level of clown. Recommend getting yourself back on task, as Endeavor doesn't have the room for two meow's.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
