Any "Latest & Greatest" about Endeavor?
06-17-2017, 06:31 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,648
Originally Posted by bocran
This is correct.
As stated above, EV 700/900s are currently on contract through 2020. The most likely source would be G7 but I've heard those might go to EV as well.
As stated above, EV 700/900s are currently on contract through 2020. The most likely source would be G7 but I've heard those might go to EV as well.
06-17-2017, 07:38 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: the right side
Posts: 1,373
Originally Posted by gojo
And how would they staff them??? Smartest thing Delta could do is replace 200's with something else. No additional staffing required. But, with that said, they probably won't do that
06-17-2017, 10:43 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,648
Originally Posted by KSCessnaDriver
Scope doesn't allow them to, unless you're talking planes at mainline replacing the 200s
06-17-2017, 01:28 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Position: CA CRJ900
Posts: 324
Originally Posted by gojo
I was referring to the 700/900's someone said might go to Express Jet from GoJet. I should've been more specific, but I thought it made sense to the post I quoted. I'm all too familiar with scope. And not the mouthwash kind
06-17-2017, 01:29 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2017
Position: 2nd base
Posts: 158
feel proud?
Originally Posted by KaiserSoze
So if our mechanics are doing maintenance, how is it being paid for?
Does it get recorded and billed back to XJT?
Does it get recorded and billed back to XJT?
We are being told that 9E is being paid money from daddy D to cover the maintenance costs of us doing the EV mx. In dtw alone it is a 30% increase in flights, not to mention different mx procedures and company policies. We were all given EV employee numbers to use to sign their books. When we asked about $$ they said there is no money and to feel proud that daddy d wants 9E to do the work... Guess how far feeling proud is going??
06-17-2017, 01:35 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: the right side
Posts: 1,373
Originally Posted by gojo
I was referring to the 700/900's someone said might go to Express Jet from GoJet. I should've been more specific, but I thought it made sense to the post I quoted. I'm all too familiar with scope. And not the mouthwash kind
06-17-2017, 01:37 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2016
Posts: 365
Originally Posted by KSCessnaDriver
Yeah my bad, I was real briefly reading, I get what you meant. I just don't see Delta giving up 200's until the CS100's are arriving on property, its just too much lift to give up without immediate replacements.
06-17-2017, 01:46 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2017
Position: 2nd base
Posts: 158
ads-b mod
Originally Posted by AnotherWriter
Even then, from what you hear about rumors about CS100 deployment, not a lot of it conflicts with what 9E/OO/EV does on the heavier CRJs, let alone the 200.
HERE IS THE RUB.... there has not been one ounce of talk about completing the ads-b mod on the 200s... 31dec2019... tick. tock.
Just my theory.. we are staring at an 81 crj900 fleet unless we pick up some 7s or 9s from someone else and the 200s go away by 2019 in time for more 737s and the c series to pick up the lift at mainline.. but I don't know jack schzit... until I see a 200 with a complete ads-b mod...
Last edited by APMechXJ; 06-17-2017 at 01:57 PM.
06-17-2017, 05:16 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 1,793
Sorry to change subjects, just thinking out loud, not looking to get crushed with criticism, just continuing the conversation for my own benefit
So with just the basic basic rough rough math, doesnt it look like converting the bonuses into wages doesnt really help you unless you work more than ~82ish hours per month? The talk seems to be that only the people who work the min get screwed, but that doesnt seem to be the case. If the company says we average 1000 hrs per year, thats 83 hours per month. Which would be break even with what we make now with the bonuses.
I'm sure there's 1000 more things to think about, this was just me trying to get my head around both sides of the argument.
Based on second year 900 pay
So with just the basic basic rough rough math, doesnt it look like converting the bonuses into wages doesnt really help you unless you work more than ~82ish hours per month? The talk seems to be that only the people who work the min get screwed, but that doesnt seem to be the case. If the company says we average 1000 hrs per year, thats 83 hours per month. Which would be break even with what we make now with the bonuses.
I'm sure there's 1000 more things to think about, this was just me trying to get my head around both sides of the argument.
Based on second year 900 pay
Last edited by Casualinterest; 06-17-2017 at 05:27 PM. Reason: Apparently you cant paste spreadsheets....
06-17-2017, 06:16 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2016
Posts: 2,559
You'll get lots of opinions on here. But very simplistically... our pay is based on 75 hours of credit a month. If you don't work a day, you do NOT get paid 82/83/85, right? So to me, our wage/bonus merging needs to also be based on 75 hours per month. If it's based on 75.1 or more hours, we are giving up pay, IMO. An upgrade in our hourly wage of anything less than $25.56 an hour is a pay decrease.
On the subject of 200s and ADS-B... is it even possible to get them all compliant at this point before the deadline? I have my doubts.
On the subject of 200s and ADS-B... is it even possible to get them all compliant at this point before the deadline? I have my doubts.
Originally Posted by Casualinterest
Sorry to change subjects, just thinking out loud, not looking to get crushed with criticism, just continuing the conversation for my own benefit
So with just the basic basic rough rough math, doesnt it look like converting the bonuses into wages doesnt really help you unless you work more than ~82ish hours per month? The talk seems to be that only the people who work the min get screwed, but that doesnt seem to be the case. If the company says we average 1000 hrs per year, thats 83 hours per month. Which would be break even with what we make now with the bonuses.
I'm sure there's 1000 more things to think about, this was just me trying to get my head around both sides of the argument.
Based on second year 900 pay
So with just the basic basic rough rough math, doesnt it look like converting the bonuses into wages doesnt really help you unless you work more than ~82ish hours per month? The talk seems to be that only the people who work the min get screwed, but that doesnt seem to be the case. If the company says we average 1000 hrs per year, thats 83 hours per month. Which would be break even with what we make now with the bonuses.
I'm sure there's 1000 more things to think about, this was just me trying to get my head around both sides of the argument.
Based on second year 900 pay
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
