Any "Latest & Greatest" about Endeavor?
All this hdg/nav mode talk leads me to believe some folks and the pubs don't quite have it down. 3 close parallel runways running simultaneous departures equates to tower and departure controllers with very narrow expectations of lateral navigation. NAV mode off the runway is their expectation. Autopilot use on every RNAV departure out of ATL is also RECOMMENDED in all caps and bunny quotes and if played backwards in slow speed actually means MANDATORY.
Not smarter than anyone else here, just experienced in ATL.
Not smarter than anyone else here, just experienced in ATL.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 888
Disagree slightly. If 200 drivers aren't pushing NAV mode until 400 ft, it is no different than the 900 because as previously mentioned the 900 won't actually track the FMS until 400 ft anyway.
Now that we've all discussed our systems knowledge at length and suitably impressed everyone... the reason for the RNAV deviations in ATL were more likely because A) people weren't verifying the runway on the MFD during their Before Takeoff verification procedure/ brief and/or B) not verifying the mode annuciation on the PFD after selecting Nav mode to ensure it took.
Why this showed up in ATL this time when we've been doing RNAV departures for years I have no idea, maybe guys were intimidated by Atlanta. Once you get used to it, it's one of the easiest airports in the system.
Now we need an LOA or something controversial to discuss!
Did anyone else see the memo from HR? i would have thought Flight Attendents would get a bigger raise than 1.25%, they need it.
Now that we've all discussed our systems knowledge at length and suitably impressed everyone... the reason for the RNAV deviations in ATL were more likely because A) people weren't verifying the runway on the MFD during their Before Takeoff verification procedure/ brief and/or B) not verifying the mode annuciation on the PFD after selecting Nav mode to ensure it took.
Why this showed up in ATL this time when we've been doing RNAV departures for years I have no idea, maybe guys were intimidated by Atlanta. Once you get used to it, it's one of the easiest airports in the system.
Now we need an LOA or something controversial to discuss!
Did anyone else see the memo from HR? i would have thought Flight Attendents would get a bigger raise than 1.25%, they need it.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2016
Posts: 2,559
I'm probably not as experienced as you in ATL, but I doubt our discussion about when to engage had anything to do with our initial problems. I fly 75% of my departures by hand, and have never had a problem. Also tried the RNAV yesterday at normal speed (gear up/SPEED mode/NAV mode) as well as NAV at 400'... no difference. Well, maybe half to one second to begin the turn is about all. Nothing ATC would ever notice.
I'd wager the RNAV issues were due to N/S runway changes that were not entered into the FMS. Was behind one of our guys yesterday who got called out for not being on track, they were given a heading shortly after takeoff to correct. Pilot said he was in NAV mode, which leads me to believe wrong runway.
I'd wager the RNAV issues were due to N/S runway changes that were not entered into the FMS. Was behind one of our guys yesterday who got called out for not being on track, they were given a heading shortly after takeoff to correct. Pilot said he was in NAV mode, which leads me to believe wrong runway.
All this hdg/nav mode talk leads me to believe some folks and the pubs don't quite have it down. 3 close parallel runways running simultaneous departures equates to tower and departure controllers with very narrow expectations of lateral navigation. NAV mode off the runway is their expectation. Autopilot use on every RNAV departure out of ATL is also RECOMMENDED in all caps and bunny quotes and if played backwards in slow speed actually means MANDATORY.
Not smarter than anyone else here, just experienced in ATL.
Not smarter than anyone else here, just experienced in ATL.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,648
I'm probably not as experienced as you in ATL, but I doubt our discussion about when to engage had anything to do with our initial problems. I fly 75% of my departures by hand, and have never had a problem. Also tried the RNAV yesterday at normal speed (gear up/SPEED mode/NAV mode) as well as NAV at 400'... no difference. Well, maybe half to one second to begin the turn is about all. Nothing ATC would ever notice.
I'd wager the RNAV issues were due to N/S runway changes that were not entered into the FMS. Was behind one of our guys yesterday who got called out for not being on track, they were given a heading shortly after takeoff to correct. Pilot said he was in NAV mode, which leads me to believe wrong runway.
I'd wager the RNAV issues were due to N/S runway changes that were not entered into the FMS. Was behind one of our guys yesterday who got called out for not being on track, they were given a heading shortly after takeoff to correct. Pilot said he was in NAV mode, which leads me to believe wrong runway.
Line Holder
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 66
All this hdg/nav mode talk leads me to believe some folks and the pubs don't quite have it down. 3 close parallel runways running simultaneous departures equates to tower and departure controllers with very narrow expectations of lateral navigation. NAV mode off the runway is their expectation. Autopilot use on every RNAV departure out of ATL is also RECOMMENDED in all caps and bunny quotes and if played backwards in slow speed actually means MANDATORY.
Not smarter than anyone else here, just experienced in ATL.
Not smarter than anyone else here, just experienced in ATL.
Some guys absolutely freak out if the autopilot isn’t on for RNAV departures. I just don’t get it.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2016
Posts: 139
This mandatory autopilot for RNAV departures nonsense is ridiculous. Ever ridden up front on mainline out of Atlanta or Kennedy? Those guys/gals hand fly RNAV departures all the time.
Some guys absolutely freak out if the autopilot isn’t on for RNAV departures. I just don’t get it.
Some guys absolutely freak out if the autopilot isn’t on for RNAV departures. I just don’t get it.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,648
This mandatory autopilot for RNAV departures nonsense is ridiculous. Ever ridden up front on mainline out of Atlanta or Kennedy? Those guys/gals hand fly RNAV departures all the time.
Some guys absolutely freak out if the autopilot isn’t on for RNAV departures. I just don’t get it.
Some guys absolutely freak out if the autopilot isn’t on for RNAV departures. I just don’t get it.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 541
This mandatory autopilot for RNAV departures nonsense is ridiculous. Ever ridden up front on mainline out of Atlanta or Kennedy? Those guys/gals hand fly RNAV departures all the time.
Some guys absolutely freak out if the autopilot isn’t on for RNAV departures. I just don’t get it.
Some guys absolutely freak out if the autopilot isn’t on for RNAV departures. I just don’t get it.
Disagree slightly. If 200 drivers aren't pushing NAV mode until 400 ft, it is no different than the 900 because as previously mentioned the 900 won't actually track the FMS until 400 ft anyway.
Now that we've all discussed our systems knowledge at length and suitably impressed everyone... the reason for the RNAV deviations in ATL were more likely because A) people weren't verifying the runway on the MFD during their Before Takeoff verification procedure/ brief and/or B) not verifying the mode annuciation on the PFD after selecting Nav mode to ensure it took.
Why this showed up in ATL this time when we've been doing RNAV departures for years I have no idea, maybe guys were intimidated by Atlanta. Once you get used to it, it's one of the easiest airports in the system.
Now we need an LOA or something controversial to discuss!
Did anyone else see the memo from HR? i would have thought Flight Attendents would get a bigger raise than 1.25%, they need it.
Now that we've all discussed our systems knowledge at length and suitably impressed everyone... the reason for the RNAV deviations in ATL were more likely because A) people weren't verifying the runway on the MFD during their Before Takeoff verification procedure/ brief and/or B) not verifying the mode annuciation on the PFD after selecting Nav mode to ensure it took.
Why this showed up in ATL this time when we've been doing RNAV departures for years I have no idea, maybe guys were intimidated by Atlanta. Once you get used to it, it's one of the easiest airports in the system.
Now we need an LOA or something controversial to discuss!
Did anyone else see the memo from HR? i would have thought Flight Attendents would get a bigger raise than 1.25%, they need it.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post