Any "Latest & Greatest" about Endeavor?
11-27-2019, 08:49 AM
On Reserve
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 20
Originally Posted by blindfayth
On the last page of this thread, he was complaining that we only had a class of 5 for one week, as if that's news worthy.
Now he's complaining that a new hire might get a decent wage, while he also makes a decent wage.
Some people are never happy and just want to find something to complain about. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Now he's complaining that a new hire might get a decent wage, while he also makes a decent wage.
Some people are never happy and just want to find something to complain about. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
11-27-2019, 09:33 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 896
Originally Posted by blindfayth
On the last page of this thread, he was complaining that we only had a class of 5 for one week, as if that's news worthy.
Now he's complaining that a new hire might get a decent wage, while he also makes a decent wage.
Some people are never happy and just want to find something to complain about. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Now he's complaining that a new hire might get a decent wage, while he also makes a decent wage.
Some people are never happy and just want to find something to complain about. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
11-27-2019, 10:24 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 368
Originally Posted by SierraMTNflyer
Tread carefully there bud. Weren't you the one who came here and complained about reserve and were on the SKW boards talking about switching because of stagnation here?
My point is that it looks really silly to say that a single class size (one point of data) was relatively small out of the entire data set from the past several months, and then turn around and say we shouldn't increase pay for new hires, Which is one way of increasing new hires.
Also, I'm fairly certain that you were complaining about the reserve situation a couple years ago as well. So what's your point?
11-27-2019, 10:38 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 896
Originally Posted by blindfayth
Or what?
My point is that it looks really silly to say that a single class size (one point of data) was relatively small out of the entire data set from the past several months, and then turn around and say we shouldn't increase pay for new hires, Which is one way of increasing new hires.
Also, I'm fairly certain that you were complaining about the reserve situation a couple years ago as well. So what's your point?
My point is that it looks really silly to say that a single class size (one point of data) was relatively small out of the entire data set from the past several months, and then turn around and say we shouldn't increase pay for new hires, Which is one way of increasing new hires.
Also, I'm fairly certain that you were complaining about the reserve situation a couple years ago as well. So what's your point?
11-27-2019, 10:48 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 368
Originally Posted by Green Needles
A single class size can be anomolus, but looking at multiple class sizes versus attrition and factoring the growth, it appears we are likely behind the hiring curve.
11-27-2019, 12:23 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2019
Posts: 442
I left for spirit. cant praise it enough. dropping down to 0 and picking up with contractual green days at 75 percent. If youre and FO and waiting for upgrade and DGI, youre a fool. the future isn't with the big three. I can assure you that in speculation. If youre hinging on the big three or 4 with Alaska, go to one with flowback provisions or I'll see you on the streets in 2020 or 2021.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
