Any "Latest & Greatest" about Endeavor?
12-20-2017 | 04:25 AM
Part of the problem
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 577
Likes: 0
From: CRJ200 CA
12-20-2017 | 05:17 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 527
Likes: 0
So if a raw data takeoff is too dangerous to practice when it's on your own terms (you choose the conditions such as weather, tiredness, lack of other distracting factors, etc.) then what makes it safe enough to be allowable when you just showed up to a cockpit on leg 4 to discover a yellow sticker on the FCP and it's go-time, and you are about to do this for your first time ever?
This is bizarre.
This is bizarre.
12-20-2017 | 07:16 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 2,559
Likes: 0
There is no 7-20 in the CFM (unless you’re privy to a new CFM the rest of us don’t have yet).
That’s not a Rev 4 thing, it’s in our current manuals, and has been for quite some time now. The FOM page 8-12 tells us LDI & FD are required for RNAV departures, and A/P is recommended.
That’s not a Rev 4 thing, it’s in our current manuals, and has been for quite some time now. The FOM page 8-12 tells us LDI & FD are required for RNAV departures, and A/P is recommended.
12-20-2017 | 07:26 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 527
Likes: 0
There is no 7-20 in the CFM (unless you’re privy to a new CFM the rest of us don’t have yet).
That’s not a Rev 4 thing, it’s in our current manuals, and has been for quite some time now. The FOM page 8-12 tells us LDI & FD are required for RNAV departures, and A/P is recommended.
That’s not a Rev 4 thing, it’s in our current manuals, and has been for quite some time now. The FOM page 8-12 tells us LDI & FD are required for RNAV departures, and A/P is recommended.
12-20-2017 | 08:30 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
interview
Can someone PM me (or post here) what to expect in an interview... coming in with previous 121. Is it different from if you're coming in having flown nothing but 172s? more casual because they know you've been a 121 pilot? or more intense because they know you're going to potentially be a captain for them within a few months?
12-20-2017 | 08:37 AM
Part of the problem
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 577
Likes: 0
From: CRJ200 CA
Can someone PM me (or post here) what to expect in an interview... coming in with previous 121. Is it different from if you're coming in having flown nothing but 172s? more casual because they know you've been a 121 pilot? or more intense because they know you're going to potentially be a captain for them within a few months?
12-20-2017 | 10:40 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 2,559
Likes: 0
The interview is pretty low key. They want good people. That being said, I wouldn't go in complacent... we have sent prior 121 folks home with no CJO a few times this year.
Can someone PM me (or post here) what to expect in an interview... coming in with previous 121. Is it different from if you're coming in having flown nothing but 172s? more casual because they know you've been a 121 pilot? or more intense because they know you're going to potentially be a captain for them within a few months?
12-20-2017 | 11:54 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 1,237
Likes: 0
So if a raw data takeoff is too dangerous to practice when it's on your own terms (you choose the conditions such as weather, tiredness, lack of other distracting factors, etc.) then what makes it safe enough to be allowable when you just showed up to a cockpit on leg 4 to discover a yellow sticker on the FCP and it's go-time, and you are about to do this for your first time ever?
This is bizarre.
This is bizarre.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
