Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > Endeavor Air
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Endeavor? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Endeavor?


Notices
Endeavor Air Regional Airline

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Endeavor?

Old 03-18-2018 | 02:25 PM
  #19211  
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 0
From: 6 Train - Panhandler
Default

Originally Posted by GreenerPastures
I'd prefer to ramp-up the 700/900 line and send the 200 to SkyWest. The cost and effort to start and maintain a 175 program at 9E might draw on company resources that I'd rather be negotiated into pay/benefits. And I imagine the 175 will go super senior even if it remained in the western-half of the US. More senior if we fly them in the east.
I've been wondering how 9E would acquire the 175?
1) A quick move from Compass at the end of their CPA wouldn't be practical. Airplanes would sit until we have crews trained.
2) Straight merge with Compass. Seniority issues especially in the 9E pilot group; although I wouldn't oppose the possibility.
3) Staple? Good way to immediately anger 600+ future fellow pilots. I oppose stapling an entire pilot group below us. Bad and unfair.
4) Bring the 175s in slowly like the EV to 9E process. Doable, but Compass gets shafted. Fellow pilots struggling as their airline is bled off...like SkyWest is doing to EV. Not good IMHO.
5) Delta buys Compass as a completely separate Wholly Owned similar to AA's regional set up with Envoy/PSA/Piedmont. Don't think that's going to happen after hearing what our CEO and COO have said about 3 DCI carriers.
If we do get the 175, I think it's going to be via #2 or #4. Maybe there's another possibility?
Of course, SkyWest and Republic fly the 175 too, but I don't think we'll see any 175s from them. Delta already has their hands around Republic's throat and SkyWest routinely bends their pilot groups over the desk while somehow convincing them it's ok because they use lube. What Mainline company would argue with that business plan?
Thoughts?
I think youre answering your own questions here.
Reply
Old 03-18-2018 | 02:27 PM
  #19212  
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 0
From: 6 Train - Panhandler
Default

Originally Posted by KSCessnaDriver
SkyPest is going to have their own staffing crisis to simply staff the 30 DL 175SC's and 10 AS 175's this year, let alone take on more flying. Outside of that, Skywest wouldn't want a load of partner owned 200's, as they own a majority of the 200's they current operate. Couple that with the fact that I'd imagine they're going to be looking to wind down that 20 AA CR7 fleet at ASA quickly, they'll need to bring that onboard OO.

Easiest way to bring a 175 program on at 9E? Don't transfer all 22 G7 700's. Give us a total fleet of 10-15 CR7's, let GoJet operate the remainder for a short term, and go buy 10 175SC's to start the fleet with at 9E. Then once that's up, you can transfer the CPZ 175's over.
If OO gets new 175's, they'll have to be 69 or 70 seat and they'd probably have to park the 700s with EV tails.
Reply
Old 03-18-2018 | 02:32 PM
  #19213  
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 0
From: 6 Train - Panhandler
Default

Originally Posted by KSCessnaDriver
SkyPest is going to have their own staffing crisis to simply staff the 30 DL 175SC's and 10 AS 175's this year, let alone take on more flying. Outside of that, Skywest wouldn't want a load of partner owned 200's, as they own a majority of the 200's they current operate. Couple that with the fact that I'd imagine they're going to be looking to wind down that 20 AA CR7 fleet at ASA quickly, they'll need to bring that onboard OO.

Easiest way to bring a 175 program on at 9E? Don't transfer all 22 G7 700's. Give us a total fleet of 10-15 CR7's, let GoJet operate the remainder for a short term, and go buy 10 175SC's to start the fleet with at 9E. Then once that's up, you can transfer the CPZ 175's over.
The last paragraph makes little business sense. What you're proposing would have Delta pay for us to develop our own type certificate for operators, new Op Specs, etc, etc. And then on top of that, have to do conformity expenses to bring CZ planes to the new 9E Op Spec. No. That's way too much money. Delta could easily acquire the whole dang thing and just slap the name 9E on the side of it for way less. Delta doesn't care about the pilot logistics of who's more senior to who, nor who gets to play captain on what. That's for Alpo to hash out.
Reply
Old 03-18-2018 | 02:33 PM
  #19214  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,395
Likes: 1
From: the right side
Default

Originally Posted by TalkTurkey
If OO gets new 175's, they'll have to be 69 or 70 seat and they'd probably have to park the 700s with EV tails.

Are you living in the dark age? This was announced 6+ months ago, they start flying in weeks. 175SC, 70 seat 175, LGA base at OO
Reply
Old 03-18-2018 | 02:37 PM
  #19215  
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 0
From: 6 Train - Panhandler
Default

Originally Posted by KSCessnaDriver
If you think a merger doesn't incite a mass exodus of pilots from 9E, I think you're crazy. It might be the most efficient way to get them on property, but probably not staffing them. How many years did the Pinnacolaba merger take to get over? According to some people, we still haven't...
That's possible. But if I'm Ed Bastian, that would bare little concern to me. Stagnation and wind downs cause exodus. Not mergers. But I know what you mean. Pan Am had 737 FOs become more senior that 747 CAs during their merger with National in 1980.
Reply
Old 03-18-2018 | 02:37 PM
  #19216  
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 0
From: 6 Train - Panhandler
Default

Originally Posted by KSCessnaDriver
Are you living in the dark age? This was announced 6+ months ago, they start flying in weeks. 175SC, 70 seat 175, LGA base at OO
No but maybe your man bits are.
Reply
Old 03-18-2018 | 06:39 PM
  #19217  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
From: Inverted
Default

Originally Posted by JetDoc
So you have a training program, CKA'S, a certified simulator, AOM, FOM, checklists, WBCM, MMEL etc. just sitting idle somewhere collecting dust??
I can’t say we do or don’t, but neither can you. Last I heard was 9E has its fingers on or nearby a sim, mx personnel were working on a program, check airman were scheduled to get trained but did not go at the last minute. So we don’t officially have a “program created,” we’ve got the ground work laid out to pick back up with the process.
Reply
Old 03-19-2018 | 04:28 AM
  #19218  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by GreenerPastures
3) Staple? Good way to immediately anger 600+ future fellow pilots. I oppose stapling an entire pilot group below us. Bad and unfair.
From our perspective, a staple would suck for those guys, but if I was sitting at a company that was going under, I would be PRAYING for a staple. It would be a life raft to pilots of a drowning company. It is SO much better than bleeding the company dry, everyone getting laid off and having to reapply to wherever.

I'm not a pilot who says "**** the other guy, as long as I'm ok, I don't care" I'm actually quite the opposite. I'll give someone the shirt off my back if he needs it, but that's not what we're talking about.

I had the option to go to other companies (and I did start somewhere else), but one of the main reasons I came to 9E is because of the stability associated with Delta owning 9E. I made a smart decision (at least for the moment it seems like it was smart) and I don't think that someone who made a bad decision should have higher seniority than I do.

An argument can be made that compass isn't a "drowning company"...but for the purpose of this post, I'm speaking in generalities
Reply
Old 03-19-2018 | 05:21 AM
  #19219  
preflight's Avatar
Will FTI for food...
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
Default 2018 Tax breaks gone?

Has anyone else stopped tipping as a result of 2018 business expense deductions being removed from pilots tax filings?

They say we get more back but there was a lot being deducted.

Anyone know the 2018 tax impacts, if any, for Per Diem?
Reply
Old 03-19-2018 | 05:35 AM
  #19220  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 107
Default

Originally Posted by preflight
Has anyone else stopped tipping as a result of 2018 business expense deductions being removed from pilots tax filings?

They say we get more back but there was a lot being deducted.

Anyone know the 2018 tax impacts, if any, for Per Diem?
Pretty sure the per diem deduction stayed. So we're good there.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
StraightShooter
Endeavor Air
124
06-26-2023 10:23 AM
WARich
Delta
11229
06-10-2020 07:42 AM
Crash
Major
3437
01-30-2013 06:51 PM
shua757
Major
2
02-24-2009 06:44 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices