![]() |
This Union group is weak. We need guys who are senior cause it’ok always be like this with the turnover that’s bound to happen.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by coodrough568
(Post 3219047)
So NOW I hear EM is leaving. What’s up with that? ATI???
|
Originally Posted by coodrough568
(Post 3219047)
So NOW I hear EM is leaving. What’s up with that? ATI???
|
Originally Posted by Sasquatched
(Post 3219185)
dera 4 prez!
|
Originally Posted by Sasquatched
(Post 3219185)
dera 4 prez!
JT for new chairman!! |
Originally Posted by buddies8
(Post 3218879)
you mean like the cadets still receiving money and benefits while we furloughed.
|
Originally Posted by aewhistleblower
(Post 3219233)
God, no!! He’s drunk of kool aid
JT for new chairman!! |
let's poach anne from the company to run the union
she's a kind soul I'm sure she's sick of being the company's hitman in dfw |
Originally Posted by ClappedOut145
(Post 3219306)
Justin Timberlake? Or JT the former LGA CA rep who is on the verge of flowing as soon as this thing starts back up? We need a lifer to run the show. Someone who isn’t part of the revolving door and has a long term interest in making Envoy a decent place to be.
|
Originally Posted by Sasquatched
(Post 3219499)
If we need a lifer than I would like to nominate buddies8, he won’t take any sh*t from nobody.
Filler |
Originally Posted by AV8R72
(Post 3219253)
the union has shut down a lot of BS company request by saying as long as the cadets program is sucking up money they won’t bend
|
Originally Posted by Sasquatched
(Post 3219499)
If we need a lifer than I would like to nominate buddies8, he won’t take any sh*t from nobody.
I just get up and go for a drive. |
Originally Posted by AV8R72
(Post 3219253)
the union has shut down a lot of BS company request by saying as long as the cadets program is sucking up money they won’t bend
Also, I’m pretty sure Buddies8 has less than a year until he retires. That wouldn't help us very much. |
Originally Posted by ClappedOut145
(Post 3219306)
Justin Timberlake? Or JT the former LGA CA rep who is on the verge of flowing as soon as this thing starts back up? We need a lifer to run the show. Someone who isn’t part of the revolving door and has a long term interest in making Envoy a decent place to be.
The problem here is the company, it doesn’t matter who our chairman is. Envoy has a terrible culture, and management doesn’t want to change that. Heck, we can’t even get a cost neutral negotiation contract done, the negotiations have stalled. I’d much rather have someone looking for the flow than trying to make envoy a better company, cuz that ain’t happening! How many times have we tried new reserve rules?(oof, that one is old) AIP?(shall not be forgotten) Unpaid learning hub training? New pay rates that were delayed for months and we never got any interest out of that? Calling people to volunteer for flights and giving them a MA for not taking a reassignment? And the list goes on... As I said, the problem is not in who the new chairman is, but Envoy management. |
Originally Posted by ClappedOut145
(Post 3219556)
Also, I’m pretty sure Buddies8 has less than a year until he retires. That wouldn't help us very much.
Well the Commander has 5 years left, how about him! He’s always a bundle of joy to interact with. Stone cold face during negotiations. |
Originally Posted by goforlaunch
(Post 3218559)
Any idea if Envoy will honor CJOs when they start hiring?
|
Flow ah yes, let negotiate everything away ( what little we have ) for more flow. Yes let's do that, I'm for it. I need a laugh from the side lines.
|
Originally Posted by buddies8
(Post 3219828)
Flow ah yes, let negotiate everything away ( what little we have ) for more flow. Yes let's do that, I'm for it. I need a laugh from the side lines.
|
When there is no clear path to a victory, sometimes its better to sit there an do nothing.
|
Originally Posted by pangolin
(Post 3219639)
There are still unfurloughed pilots awaiting training to go back to the line.
|
Originally Posted by CLE to IAH
(Post 3219866)
that doesn’t really address his question about CJO’s though, does it?
|
Originally Posted by CptnDave
(Post 3220103)
Eventually they’ll likely reach out to you to see if you’re still interested, I’d assume that comes sometime in the coming months, wouldn’t surprise me if they have some kind of refresher interview just to see where you’re at. Pilot hiring is coming back sooner than later, envoy just seems to be dragging their heels more than other carriers. Doesn’t negate the fact that hiring will likely return to someone resembling 2019 at some point this year. We’ll probably figure out more this month.
|
Originally Posted by pitchattitude
(Post 3220131)
I have to disagree with the hiring coming back sooner rather than later. Like I said in my previous response, all the people that have been benched, however many of the approximately 225 come back, will need quite a bit of training time. Yes, there will be SOME hiring after that. But just like every other carrier, Envoy will be smaller. Roughly 80% of what it was. They are basically attritting down to that size. When they start hiring again, it will be for that continued attrition, with no real indication of growth for the foreseeable future. The whole industry will need to really start moving again to see the kind of attrition they had in the past. And a smaller Envoy also means less flow as flow is based on number of pilots on the seniority list. That is all part of the attrition-hiring equation. I just don’t see the kind of numbers Envoy was hiring for some time. I mean they were telling people to go to PSA.
Also should note, AAG were the ones who wanted some cadets at PSA since they needed the staffing and already dished out the money. Envoy obliged but controlled that number it seems. They didn’t send over too many just those with relatively high time. |
Originally Posted by CptnDave
(Post 3220133)
The telling people to go to PSA seemed to have stopped, and speaking of PSA it took them 3 months to get over 700 pilots back through trading again. I think we can handle 224 in a timely manner while starting ground schools up again. Time will tell but from what I’m hearing it will be sooner than later. I don’t think we’ll quite be interviewing new candidates necessarily however cadets and those already with a CJO will likely be in a class this summer. But I think we’ll have a better understanding of that this month sometime.
Also should note, AAG were the ones who wanted some cadets at PSA since they needed the staffing and already dished out the money. Envoy obliged but controlled that number it seems. They didn’t send over too many just those with relatively high time. |
Originally Posted by pitchattitude
(Post 3220139)
Fair enough. I don’t know the numbers, but I don’t think PSA had 700 come back. That was the problem and why they needed the new hires so quickly.
|
Originally Posted by pitchattitude
(Post 3220139)
Fair enough. I don’t know the numbers, but I don’t think PSA had 700 come back. That was the problem and why they needed the new hires so quickly.
|
Originally Posted by But seriously
(Post 3220166)
They didn’t. We also have no idea how many of our furloughs will come back.
|
Originally Posted by Swakid8
(Post 3220148)
This right here, a lot of those 700 guys and gals have moved on at PSA.
|
Originally Posted by coodrough568
(Post 3220266)
I wonder if ALPA has historical data of a rough average of how many never come back from a furlough. 10%? 25%? I guess it would be hard because some carriers are more worthwhile to come back to. But I would be willing to bet at least 10% of our 225 do not come back.
|
Originally Posted by coodrough568
(Post 3220275)
except for those months around 2016/2017 where sometimes only 3-5 people showed up. And the one where the entire class except for 2 people walked out of because they couldn’t get the 175.
|
Originally Posted by coodrough568
(Post 3220275)
except for those months around 2016/2017 where sometimes only 3-5 people showed up. And the one where the entire class except for 2 people walked out of because they couldn’t get the 175.
|
Originally Posted by havick206
(Post 3220283)
True, but the point being 25 is a drop in the ocean.
|
Originally Posted by coodrough568
(Post 3220275)
except for those months around 2016/2017 where sometimes only 3-5 people showed up. And the one where the entire class except for 2 people walked out of because they couldn’t get the 175.
|
Originally Posted by CLE to IAH
(Post 3220480)
are you serious
|
Originally Posted by JungleJetBoss
(Post 3220512)
Yes, he’s serious
|
Originally Posted by CLE to IAH
(Post 3220521)
seems like that would follow you around. Hopefully none of them were THBoobs famed cadets who were promised the 175?!
Again, not something I would have recommended but it could have been more than just the plane for some. |
Originally Posted by coodrough568
(Post 3220275)
except for those months around 2016/2017 where sometimes only 3-5 people showed up. And the one where the entire class except for 2 people walked out of because they couldn’t get the 175.
The cadet program wasn’t a big thing in 2016 and cadet status didn’t play into seniority until probably late 2018. There was a class that would have had cadets with first choice that was all 145s either late 2019, maybe very early 2020, but “all but two” didn’t walk out. Might have been a couple that did, but if they were cadets, they would have been on the hook for some money. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:02 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands