![]() |
Originally Posted by coodrough568
(Post 3220562)
the best part is the few that stayed, who WERE going to get 145, got rewarded by the company and changed them to 175. The Union had a field day with that.
|
Originally Posted by coodrough568
(Post 3220562)
the best part is the few that stayed, who WERE going to get 145, got rewarded by the company and changed them to 175. The Union had a field day with that.
Like I said in my previous post, nothing I could find to support this. |
Originally Posted by moonraker9
(Post 3220573)
wow that's gold... Sure the 175 is nice but the goal for everyone should be to get in to the regionals and get out as fast as possible, not fly the shiniest jet.
it's not a stick/rudder thing although apparently many of us can't land right. it's a complete lack of situational awareness and planning. point being that perhaps some of these pilots know they're weak and know the airplane will take up some of the slack for them. |
Originally Posted by pitchattitude
(Post 3220590)
What class was this? Not buying it.
Like I said in my previous post, nothing I could find to support this. When did Envoy have a class that was only 145s and all but two walked out and subsequently were given 175s?? |
At least those planes still had an autopilot. Strap on a Metroliner or a Jetstream for 6-8 legs and see how’d they do.
Originally Posted by coodrough568
(Post 3220676)
please attempt to go to UND or Embry and make that statement to these kids nowadays. I would love to see their faces if someone told them they had to fly an ATR or SAAB
|
Originally Posted by NoValueAviator
(Post 3220630)
having flown both i'm going to tell you right now that there are absolutely guys who have flown and even upgraded successfully on the 175 who would lose their jobs on the 145
it's not a stick/rudder thing although apparently many of us can't land right. it's a complete lack of situational awareness and planning. point being that perhaps some of these pilots know they're weak and know the airplane will take up some of the slack for them. |
Originally Posted by ImSoSuss
(Post 3220695)
the 145 is hard to fly
|
The e145 is hard for most cadets. They barely know whats going on in the e175. Procedures and system knowledge, what's that.
|
Originally Posted by buddies8
(Post 3220736)
The e145 is hard for most cadets. They barely know whats going on in the e175. Procedures and system knowledge, what's that.
|
Originally Posted by coodrough568
(Post 3220731)
that was 2017 sometime. My friend was one that didn’t walk out
Have their been people that leave because they didn’t get what they wanted. Absolutely. But as I said before the cadets were on the hook for money if they left and there was definitely no class that had a mass exodus. |
Originally Posted by jonnyjetprop
(Post 3220694)
At least those planes still had an autopilot. Strap on a Metroliner or a Jetstream for 6-8 legs and see how’d they do.
|
Originally Posted by buddies8
(Post 3220736)
The e145 is hard for most cadets. They barely know whats going on in the e175. Procedures and system knowledge, what's that.
|
Originally Posted by aewhistleblower
(Post 3220757)
They’re pretty good at memorizing the study guide and that’s it. They can’t put two and two together when they’re flying the line.
|
Originally Posted by coodrough568
(Post 3220846)
from what I can tell it’s not just envoy, but cadets as a whole. Which makes me think it’s not just cadets, but now we are reaping the benefits of no child left behind participation award generations. You know the ones that never had to do any research or studying on their own
As a captain I’ve flown with new hire cadets who more than knew what they were doing. All anecdotal I suppose. |
There is a rising number of 3.5 stripers in the right seat who think they know everything.
|
Originally Posted by coodrough568
(Post 3220846)
from what I can tell it’s not just envoy, but cadets as a whole. Which makes me think it’s not just cadets, but now we are reaping the benefits of no child left behind participation award generations. You know the ones that never had to do any research or studying on their own
|
Oh here we go generational gap, oh wait no one has to answer why they are still here, what should be asked why the cadets have no idea whats in the fom or there respective aom. Oh God help you if the autopilot or autothrottles are mel'd.
|
Originally Posted by buddies8
(Post 3220952)
Oh here we go generational gap, oh wait no one has to answer why they are still here, what should be asked why the cadets have no idea whats in the fom or there respective aom. Oh God help you if the autopilot or autothrottles are mel'd.
|
Originally Posted by ClappedOut145
(Post 3220981)
The lack of AOM knowledge is a reflection of the training department. AQP has enabled pilots to become lazy and not learn. How many new pilots could draw the hydraulic system and actually explain how it works? We are not AA and despite the dream to standardize everything with them, our training needs to be more robust because we are seeing a different type of pilot than them.
Your entire library of manuals at home is now always with you in the cockpit to be factually referenced if you have a situation out on the line. This is progress. |
Originally Posted by captive apple
(Post 3220988)
There is no valid reason to be able to draw a system. Nice try. When that was required people only really knew it for the month around the PC then dumped it as they flew the line for the next five months anyway.
Your entire library of manuals at home is now always with you in the cockpit to be factually referenced if you have a situation out on the line. This is progress. So on the E145, HYD SYS 1 FAIL with a L ENG FIRE EICAS pops on short final going into LGA, or even Key West... what about at 31L at JFK, any difference? Are you landing or going around? What systems are or aren't going to be available to you? Do you really have time to look up the stuff on your EFB like you said? |
Originally Posted by Cujo665
(Post 3220995)
Disagree vehemently. When "it" hits the fan is not the time to be looking up in an EFB how a system is laid out and operates. That's the time to be running the appropriate checklists, which BTW are designed to be run by somebody that understands the system. Not every event will have a checklist or memory item, and many events will be such that you need your system knowledge to not make things worse. If you can't be bothered to understand the systems on the ONLY type plane you are being paid to fly hundreds of passengers per day, then you have no business in the front end of the jet.
|
Originally Posted by GrabNGoBag
(Post 3220999)
They don't pay us enough to understand how the systems work on that level. Don't matter if we're carrying 10 or 300 people. Start paying us more and maybe we can learn the systems in depth.
|
Originally Posted by Cujo665
(Post 3221002)
Most unprofessional post of the year right there.
|
Originally Posted by GrabNGoBag
(Post 3220999)
They don't pay us enough to understand how the systems work on that level. Don't matter if we're carrying 10 or 300 people. Start paying us more and maybe we can learn the systems in depth.
|
All true, but it is your responsibility to know the fom and aom, if you can't comprehend then maybe run for president next election.
|
Originally Posted by Cujo665
(Post 3220995)
Disagree vehemently. When "it" hits the fan is not the time to be looking up in an EFB how a system is laid out and operates. That's the time to be running the appropriate checklists, which BTW are designed to be run by somebody that understands the system. Not every event will have a checklist or memory item, and many events will be such that you need your system knowledge to not make things worse. If you can't be bothered to understand the systems on the ONLY type plane you are being paid to fly hundreds of passengers per day, then you have no business in the front end of the jet.
So on the E145, HYD SYS 1 FAIL with a L ENG FIRE EICAS pops on short final going into LGA, or even Key West... what about at 31L at JFK, any difference? Are you landing or going around? What systems are or aren't going to be available to you? Do you really have time to look up the stuff on your EFB like you said? ok. I don’t agree with that either. |
Originally Posted by captive apple
(Post 3220988)
There is no valid reason to be able to draw a system. Nice try. When that was required people only really knew it for the month around the PC then dumped it as they flew the line for the next five months anyway.
Your entire library of manuals at home is now always with you in the cockpit to be factually referenced if you have a situation out on the line. This is progress. |
Originally Posted by ClappedOut145
(Post 3221059)
It's absolutely your responsibility to know your aircraft and how the thing works. Just knowing an EICAS message pops up isn't sufficient when you're on fire.
Oh so now you just need to know the systems and no longer need to draw it? Any other amendments? Hey guy, what oil filter does this bird use? |
yikes
Originally Posted by GrabNGoBag
(Post 3220999)
They don't pay us enough to understand how the systems work on that level. Don't matter if we're carrying 10 or 300 people. Start paying us more and maybe we can learn the systems in depth.
|
Originally Posted by GrabNGoBag
(Post 3221028)
What? I have always looked at it of compensating me for what they ask me. The FOM or GOM will lay out what is it expected of you. That's what I do and not an inch more. I don't say hi to the TSA agent or gate agent since I'm not required to. Why do something if they're not going to pay you for it?
A. You’re not “required” to say hi to anyone, it’s just courtesy. If you need to be paid to be courteous, you must be a treat to be around. B. As for your comment on not bothering to learn systems, because they don’t pay you enough, I agree with Cujo, SUPER unprofessional. I’m guessing it’s not actually true, and you are just trolling, but if that really is true, you probably shouldn’t be an airline pilot. You don’t just get paid to fly. We all love to fly. They wouldn’t have to pay me, even what ENY pays me to do it. You get paid to be a professional in addition to just having an ATP. If that means you have to occasionally study more than just the questions you know will be on the test... so be it. I’ll also add that the training dept should require/encourage us to know our planes better, but that’s not an excuse. |
Originally Posted by Cujo665
(Post 3220995)
.
So on the E145, HYD SYS 1 FAIL with a L ENG FIRE EICAS pops on short final going into LGA, or even Key West... what about at 31L at JFK, any difference? Are you landing or going around? What systems are or aren't going to be available to you? Do you really have time to look up the stuff on your EFB like you said? |
Originally Posted by But seriously
(Post 3221084)
This feels like troll territory, but I’ll bite...
A. You’re not “required” to say hi to anyone, it’s just courtesy. If you need to be paid to be courteous, you must be a treat to be around. B. As for your comment on not bothering to learn systems, because they don’t pay you enough, I agree with Cujo, SUPER unprofessional. I’m guessing it’s not actually true, and you are just trolling, but if that really is true, you probably shouldn’t be an airline pilot. You don’t just get paid to fly. We all love to fly. They wouldn’t have to pay me, even what ENY pays me to do it. You get paid to be a professional in addition to just having an ATP. If that means you have to occasionally study more than just the questions you know will be on the test... so be it. I’ll also add that the training dept should require/encourage us to know our planes better, but that’s not an excuse. More importantly, it's sad to hear you say you'd do this JOB for free since you enjoy flying that much. This attitude is what managment uses to Nickle and Dime us to no end because they know it's a passion we all share. They might say we're professionals, but I sure as h*ell don't feel like it when I see my paychecks. |
Originally Posted by GrabNGoBag
(Post 3221127)
No trolling here sir. You're all over the place with this response. I never said I don't have systems knowledge. As mentioned, I know what the FOM and AOMs contain and expect me to know; this is what I am paid to understand, so I do no more than this.
More importantly, it's sad to hear you say you'd do this JOB for free since you enjoy flying that much. This attitude is what managment uses to Nickle and Dime us to no end because they know it's a passion we all share. They might say we're professionals, but I sure as h*ell don't feel like it when I see my paychecks They don't pay us enough to understand how the systems work on that level. Don't matter if we're carrying 10 or 300 people. Start paying us more and maybe we can learn the systems in depth. . As for flying for free... If I had all the money in the world, I’d still enjoy flying airplanes. The JOB part is flying where I’m told, when I’m told, being responsible for other people’s lives, being away from my kids, missing birthdays, etc. If the job description was “Whenever you feel like it, go grab a jet and putz around for a few hours with no responsibilities” then yes I’d probably do that for free. |
Originally Posted by GrabNGoBag
(Post 3221028)
What? I have always looked at it of compensating me for what they ask me. The FOM or GOM will lay out what is it expected of you. That's what I do and not an inch more. I don't say hi to the TSA agent or gate agent since I'm not required to. Why do something if they're not going to pay you for it?
Last I checked there’s No such thing as a FOM or GOM at Envoy... it been called something else for decades. As we and others have said, all regionals are not the same. You’ve proved it yet again. Which contractor outfit are you with? |
Originally Posted by captive apple
(Post 3221065)
“When you’re on fire” 🔥 What sensational text.
Oh so now you just need to know the systems and no longer need to draw it? Any other amendments? Hey guy, what oil filter does this bird use? |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:02 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands