Notices
Envoy Airlines Regional Airline

New Envoy Information

Old 06-11-2016 | 09:02 AM
  #3321  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by None
That is my point lol. You get it at least.

Obviously go skers is not a proffesional aviator. So I will treat he or she as such.

This mentality from Envoy management should be a huge red flag to any proffesional aviator out there wondering if Envoy would be a good fit for them.

I have flown part 91 135 and 121 and have never seen any pilot group treated with such disdain and hate than what this pilot group endures on a daily basis.

I have no doubt they have many meetings on why they can't get bodies in the door. Looks like they are even throwing money at the problem as well. Would be a lot cheaper to purge that place of all the inept managers that have nothing better to do than chase coffee criminals.
So you've never flown at Envoy but just now over the last couple pages have become a regional airline social justice warrior and a crusader for treatment of Envoy pilots? Cool story.
Reply
Old 06-11-2016 | 09:30 AM
  #3322  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by go skers
So you've never flown at Envoy but just now over the last couple pages have become a regional airline social justice warrior and a crusader for treatment of Envoy pilots? Cool story.
Let see here, I have only posted since joining on this thread. Most of it engaged with your nonsense. Yet you have now magically been able to determine who I have or have not flown for.

Ok so let me treat you accordingly. I have not stated who I have flown for or who I fly for. How you need to interpret that fact is you have no clue who I have flown for or who I fly for currently.

I said I flew parts 91,135, and 121. What that means is I could have flown for any 121 carrier or I could still be flying for a 121 carrier. It also means I could have flown for any 135 carrier or still be flying for a 135 carrier. It also means I could have flown for any part 91 operator or could still be flying for a part 91 operator.

See how that works? That is how the adults read and comprehend.

As I said earlier clearly not a proffesional aviator.
Reply
Old 06-11-2016 | 09:58 AM
  #3323  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,521
Likes: 1,108
Default

Originally Posted by None
Let see here, I have only posted since joining on this thread. Most of it engaged with your nonsense. Yet you have now magically been able to determine who I have or have not flown for.

Ok so let me treat you accordingly. I have not stated who I have flown for or who I fly for. How you need to interpret that fact is you have no clue who I have flown for or who I fly for currently.

I said I flew parts 91,135, and 121. What that means is I could have flown for any 121 carrier or I could still be flying for a 121 carrier. It also means I could have flown for any 135 carrier or still be flying for a 135 carrier. It also means I could have flown for any part 91 operator or could still be flying for a part 91 operator.

See how that works? That is how the adults read and comprehend.

As I said earlier clearly not a proffesional aviator.
You mean professional? Sorry. I couldn't help myself
Reply
Old 06-11-2016 | 10:14 AM
  #3324  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by CBreezy
You mean professional? Sorry. I couldn't help myself
Only "ProFFesional" pilots can fly their 40 seat RJ to FL440.
Reply
Old 06-11-2016 | 10:20 AM
  #3325  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by None
Let see here, I have only posted since joining on this thread. Most of it engaged with your nonsense. Yet you have now magically been able to determine who I have or have not flown for.

Ok so let me treat you accordingly. I have not stated who I have flown for or who I fly for. How you need to interpret that fact is you have no clue who I have flown for or who I fly for currently.

I said I flew parts 91,135, and 121. What that means is I could have flown for any 121 carrier or I could still be flying for a 121 carrier. It also means I could have flown for any 135 carrier or still be flying for a 135 carrier. It also means I could have flown for any part 91 operator or could still be flying for a part 91 operator.

See how that works? That is how the adults read and comprehend.

As I said earlier clearly not a proffesional aviator.
You could be a part 91 DFW GV driver, a part 121 allegiant MD-80 FO, an ex-Eagle pilot or a journeyman part 135 operator who's been above FL420. Do you know what connects all of those? Your awful grammar and writing style along with your disdain for Envoy based on how your tenure there likely ended. Keep writing paragraphs though. Your endless incoherent ranting continues to make my point.
Reply
Old 06-11-2016 | 11:02 AM
  #3326  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by go skers
You could be a part 91 DFW GV driver, a part 121 allegiant MD-80 FO, an ex-Eagle pilot or a journeyman part 135 operator who's been above FL420. Do you know what connects all of those? Your awful grammar and writing style along with your disdain for Envoy based on how your tenure there likely ended. Keep writing paragraphs though. Your endless incoherent ranting continues to make my point.
Yes I could be anyone of those listed above.

This is what a new hire will be expected to endure if you go to Envoy. I have no doubt in my mind based off your responses you have to be some middle manager at the Voy that has taken my opinion personally.

That is your future at Envoy should you be unwise enough to seek other opportunities.

Off topic though, you all crack me up. The thought of going above fl420 has really gotten your panties into a twist. You all remind of a child that was shown his or her first magic trick. I can see your faces now and hear all the ooooos and aaaaahs while drool runs down your chin as you ponder the fact that an aircraft can go higher than fl420. As if the hand of God has come down to lift the aircraft into some no mans land that even a guy like Bob Hoover himself would wet himself should he find himself up there.

No way you all are pilots. Google Bob Hoover as I am sure you have no clue who that is also.
Reply
Old 06-11-2016 | 11:16 AM
  #3327  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by None
Yes I could be anyone of those listed above.

This is what a new hire will be expected to endure if you go to Envoy. I have no doubt in my mind based off your responses you have to be some middle manager at the Voy that has taken my opinion personally.

That is your future at Envoy should you be unwise enough to seek other opportunities.

Off topic though, you all crack me up. The thought of going above fl420 has really gotten your panties into a twist. You all remind of a child that was shown his or her first magic trick. I can see your faces now and hear all the ooooos and aaaaahs while drool runs down your chin as you ponder the fact that an aircraft can go higher than fl420. As if the hand of God has come down to lift the aircraft into some no mans land that even a guy like Bob Hoover himself would wet himself should he find himself up there.

No way you all are pilots. Google Bob Hoover as I am sure you have no clue who that is also.
you sound like eaglefly. Always complaining about the company. If you dont work here how about you just dont post here. Please realize nobody likes you on here.
Reply
Old 06-11-2016 | 11:37 AM
  #3328  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by criticalaoa
you sound like eaglefly. Always complaining about the company. If you dont work here how about you just dont post here. Please realize nobody likes you on here.
Omfg

Is this for real?

A guy who Works at Aerosim flight school is on an Envoy thread telling me I don't work at Envoy and I should not just post here.

Mr. Aerosim feel free to go to Envoy when you acquire the required hours. You will be management material long before your proby ride.

So where is here MR. Aerosim? Do I have to work at Aerosim to post in this Envoy thread or is it Envoy?

Nobody likes me here? Again what is your definition of here Mr. Aerosim?
Reply
Old 06-11-2016 | 11:37 AM
  #3329  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 540
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by go skers
You could be a part 91 DFW GV driver, a part 121 allegiant MD-80 FO, an ex-Eagle pilot or a journeyman part 135 operator who's been above FL420. Do you know what connects all of those? Your awful grammar and writing style along with your disdain for Envoy based on how your tenure there likely ended. Keep writing paragraphs though. Your endless incoherent ranting continues to make my point.
You sound so similar to Skyvector, well, I believe it's you Sky.
Reply
Old 06-11-2016 | 11:43 AM
  #3330  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by None
Omfg

Is this for real?

A guy who Works at Aerosim flight school is on an Envoy thread telling me I don't work at Envoy and I should not just post here.

Mr. Aerosim feel free to go to Envoy when you acquire the required hours. You will be management material long before your proby ride.

So where is here MR. Aerosim? Do I have to work at Aerosim to post in this Envoy thread or is it Envoy?

Nobody likes me here? Again what is your definition of here Mr. Aerosim?
I laughed to when he barked I was "always complaining about the company". A large percentage of my assertions had less to do about the company and more to do about some of those representing it inaccurately.

But............haters gonna hate.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
satpak77
Envoy Airlines
82
03-25-2020 05:55 AM
heading180
Regional
6398
08-18-2014 01:11 PM
bernoulli1129
Regional
2045
07-17-2014 12:05 PM
DFWEMB
Envoy Airlines
53
02-03-2014 10:02 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices