Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > Retired Regionals > ExpressJet
What's the Latest at ASA/Expressjet? >

What's the Latest at ASA/Expressjet?

Search

Notices
ExpressJet Regional Airline

What's the Latest at ASA/Expressjet?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-24-2014 | 09:22 PM
  #7061  
Firsttimeflyer's Avatar
Stuck Mic
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,059
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by captlonestar
"You decide"

I've decided that your a douchbag. Please **** all of you!
I believe "you're" is the word you were looking for. Please carry on.
Old 08-24-2014 | 09:34 PM
  #7062  
Firsttimeflyer's Avatar
Stuck Mic
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,059
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Nevets

The other side you speak of use to have a very good cooperative relationship with management before about 5 years ago. So much so that this side agreed to take concessions. This side also had a history of profit (with the same aircraft and contract we have now by the way) and historically very good performance metrics, no matter how you choose to measure it. So you decide, what's changed?
You should be able to tell me what caused the decline and the eventual sale of basically assets of LXJT.
Now the stubbornness to not see that decline, to not try to take action even if it means little things like checking in (seriously how hard is it to log onto your phone once a week for a 4 day and hit "check in")...but OH NO you want to **** and moan about....that is the attitude that INC has seen from the get go. I wish you all luck.
Old 08-25-2014 | 03:18 AM
  #7063  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Firsttimeflyer
Well Inc has a history of profits and relative cooperation from one side, the other side they have a history of fighting, childish acts, losing a lot of money, and unprofitable aircraft/contract/etc.

You decide.
First time flyer, long time moron.

I hope somebody hands you a helmet every time you walk out the door. Better yet, how about we make a sign that says "I have no clue" that we can hang around your neck. That would save the rest of us a lot of trouble.
Old 08-25-2014 | 03:50 AM
  #7064  
Captain Tony's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,967
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Nevets
There you go again making stuff up. Skywest Inc bought xjt for $133, which xjt had as liquid assets at the time by the way. ASA didn't have any cash position, Inc does. And even if ASA had a 9 figure cash position, doesn't that make it one dollar short of $10M, at best? Seems to me that even using your $26M number, you fall short. And just because some smart attorneys write some fancy words and create shell companies to affect the transactions doesn't mean that Inc didn't buy xjt. That was all part of the game they played to try to show that our scope and holding letter doesn't apply. We all know that there is ONE CEO and ONE BOD. It's the same CEO and BOD ASA had before Skywest bought xjt and it's the only CEO and BOD that makes the decision to purchase an airline. Otherwise you would have us believe that the ASA COO BH concocted the idea and executed the purchase of xjt and then told his CEO and BOD about it. Either you think we are stupid or someone else is.


Nobody is talking about SLI. The fact that that is even in your thought process shows that your position doesn't hold water. Xjt wasn't going anywhere. Cal was not going to let 244 aircraft be parked in a chapter 7 liquidation as you allude to. Dal couldn't even let pinnacle go under and they had fewer aircraft. Fact is that xjt was starting to turn it around and was in talks with airways. If you read the merger agreement, Inc required xjt to halt all negotiations with airways. And guess who got that flying shortly thereafter?

Anyway, stop trying to say things that aren't true. You get called out on them at least half the time. How many syllables does Acey have? One right? You still holding on on to that one?

Ps here is a wsj article quoting the president of Skywest inc, not the president of ASA.

SkyWest to Buy ExpressJet for $133 Million - WSJ

SkyWest Inc. agreed to pay $133 million in cash for ExpressJet Holdings Inc.

Brad Rich, SkyWest's chief financial officer, didn't rule out further deals as the regional sector tries to handle pressure from the majors to cut costs and improve efficiency.
Rich said the new deal is completely different as it has reached a new pact to fly on behalf of Continental that extends the existing term and will ease its aircraft replacement plans.
Rich said SkyWest aimed to combine the airlines within 12 months, and forecast a 45-50 cent boost to annual earnings from $60 million to $70 million in cost savings.
Your financial information is completely incorrect.

You can't count. Try again and tell me how much money 9 figures are.

I noticed you didn't deny you were purchased and made a subsidiary of Atlantic Southeast. Thanks, now let's move on.

The argument about common CEOs has been tried and failed.

Where did I leave my red Swingline????
Old 08-25-2014 | 07:14 AM
  #7065  
Firsttimeflyer's Avatar
Stuck Mic
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,059
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by FDX8891
First time flyer, long time moron.

I hope somebody hands you a helmet every time you walk out the door. Better yet, how about we make a sign that says "I have no clue" that we can hang around your neck. That would save the rest of us a lot of trouble.
Instead of acting childish, post up some factual data and profits statistics that shows the timeframe that Inc has owned ASA after it bought them from Delta, then post the data from the time ASA/INC purchased XJT.

I'm not the one making the big calls, I'm just point out the facts. One side has made money and had contracts that made money for INC. The other side has not. Its not like I'm making this up or I'm the one that made it happen. Sometimes the truth hurts, luckily I have my helmet. You want to borrow it before you pound your head on your desk?
Old 08-25-2014 | 07:30 AM
  #7066  
Firsttimeflyer's Avatar
Stuck Mic
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,059
Likes: 0
Default

Just to settle the dispute. ASA purchased Expressjet for $6.75 a share for a total of $133 million.

"In August 2010, SkyWest Inc. announced that it had entered into a definitive merger agreement with ExpressJet Holdings, whereby SkyWest Inc.'s wholly owned subsidiary, Atlantic Southeast Airlines, would purchase ExpressJet for $6.75 per share. Atlantic Southeast Airlines and ExpressJet became the world's largest regional airline on November 12, 2010 once the purchase was final. The self-proclaimed "Super Regional" airline is based in Atlanta."


"This isn't the first time SkyWest has looked at ExpressJet. Back in 2008, SkyWest made an offer for the airline for $3.50 a share. That didn't go through, and today, SkyWest is paying $6.75 a share. Shareholders of ExpressJet should be very happy to have pulled that in. [Update: There was a reverse stock split late in 2008, so the original offer in 2008 would have brought in about $180 million while this will bring in $133 million. I still say the ExpressJet shareholders should be happy about this considering the continued losses at ExpressJet.]"

One more article in case there is any confusion: SkyWest to acquire ExpressJet in continued US regional consolidation | CAPA - Centre for Aviation

"Subsidiary Atlantic Southeast Airlines will acquire all of the outstanding shares of common stock of ExpressJet Holdings, Inc. for USD6.75 per share in cash, representing a net purchase price of approximately USD133 million after accounting for the shares already owned by Atlantic Southeast."
Old 08-25-2014 | 08:00 AM
  #7067  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 611
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Firsttimeflyer
Just to settle the dispute. ASA purchased Expressjet for $6.75 a share for a total of $133 million.

"In August 2010, SkyWest Inc. announced that it had entered into a definitive merger agreement with ExpressJet Holdings, whereby SkyWest Inc.'s wholly owned subsidiary, Atlantic Southeast Airlines, would purchase ExpressJet for $6.75 per share. Atlantic Southeast Airlines and ExpressJet became the world's largest regional airline on November 12, 2010 once the purchase was final. The self-proclaimed "Super Regional" airline is based in Atlanta."


"This isn't the first time SkyWest has looked at ExpressJet. Back in 2008, SkyWest made an offer for the airline for $3.50 a share. That didn't go through, and today, SkyWest is paying $6.75 a share. Shareholders of ExpressJet should be very happy to have pulled that in. [Update: There was a reverse stock split late in 2008, so the original offer in 2008 would have brought in about $180 million while this will bring in $133 million. I still say the ExpressJet shareholders should be happy about this considering the continued losses at ExpressJet.]"

One more article in case there is any confusion: SkyWest to acquire ExpressJet in continued US regional consolidation | CAPA - Centre for Aviation

"Subsidiary Atlantic Southeast Airlines will acquire all of the outstanding shares of common stock of ExpressJet Holdings, Inc. for USD6.75 per share in cash, representing a net purchase price of approximately USD133 million after accounting for the shares already owned by Atlantic Southeast."
Continued losses, even before SkyWest bought them?!! That contradicts everything Nevets says. You can't post stuff that disproves Nevets, the universe will implode in on itself.
Old 08-25-2014 | 08:22 AM
  #7068  
Firsttimeflyer's Avatar
Stuck Mic
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,059
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by NVUS
Continued losses, even before SkyWest bought them?!! That contradicts everything Nevets says. You can't post stuff that disproves Nevets, the universe will implode in on itself.
I don't know what he said, but it has been continued losses. Probably the reason XJT was purchased for $50 million less than when they were first looked at by INC.

Speaking of $50 million, that is about what INC is saying Expressjet lost in 2013.

Steer Clear of SkyWest, Inc. (SKYW)
Old 08-25-2014 | 09:00 AM
  #7069  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
Default

Originally Posted by Firsttimeflyer
You should be able to tell me what caused the decline and the eventual sale of basically assets of LXJT.
Now the stubbornness to not see that decline, to not try to take action even if it means little things like checking in (seriously how hard is it to log onto your phone once a week for a 4 day and hit "check in")...but OH NO you want to **** and moan about....that is the attitude that INC has seen from the get go. I wish you all luck.
I've done it several times here but I'll go through it again. CAL spun off XJT to make some money. They sold it off at $16 per share. The reason why it was such a high price is because CAL wrote the CPA that guaranteed XJT 10-11.5% profit. CAL made half a billion selling 50% of XJT. They slowly would sell off all but one share (in order to maintain control per the CPA) and use those proceeds to fund their pilots' defined benefit plan (pension). What the finer print in the CPA said was yet to be known to everyone. After five years (2007) and every year thereafter, the CPA required CAL/XJT to go into arbitration if they couldn't agree on a rate reset. The first year they settled with XJT being guaranteed 8.5-10% by the elimination of some pass through costs. The following year they couldn't come to an agreement so it went to arbitration. CAL lost in that even though the rate was lower, it wasn't even close to what CAL wanted. If I remember correctly, it amounted to about 2% of what they wanted. So the following year, seeing as that arbitration wasn't going to allow CAL to lower the rates as much as they wanted, they used another clause in the CPA to exert pressure. When CAL/XJT werent able to come to an agreement again, CAL threatened to use their 25% removal clause. XJT called their bluff and CAL proceeded by announcing the removal of 69 aircraft. Except that if CAL did that, XJT had the first right of refusal on those aircraft. That gave birth to XJT's branded flying, the charter department, and the DAL CPA & pro-rate flying. Of course, shortly thereafter the price of oil reached $147 per barrel and there wasn't even a chance to see if it would work after that.

At the same time that XJT was losing millions and millions every quarter (2008), CAL paid Skywest $9M for their due diligence to buy XJT. After their due dilligence, Skywest made an offer to the XJT BOD, which was rejected, then a counter offer which was presumably accepted, except that it came with conditions which the BOD didn't have control over. That's what brought the XJT MEC into the picture. Skywest's conditions where for the XJT MEC to waive its scope and holding letter. They asked us to take concessions (16%) as part of the deal in order to bring us to parity to the average skywest pilot compensation. Skywest negotiated a 15 year CPA that would have brought all 69 aircraft back into the CALEX and parked the 30 135s. But it was actually two separate CPAs, one for about 219 aircraft and one for about 25 aircraft that skywest pilots would fly. They would also furlough 700 pilots and offer them preferential interviews at skywest. After some negotiations, the XJT MEC declined. But in the mean time, CAL now had a negotiated CPA with Skywest that took into account in the block hour rates, any synergy savings, economies of scale, savings from renegotiated (larger) vendor contracts, and pilot concessions. So CAL exercised another clause of the CPA while using the negotiated Skywest cpa by telling XJT that it either offer CAL a CPA at least as good as Skywest's or they would give XJT their 12 months notice of cancellation of the entire CPA with the subsequent draw down already written into the CPA of 15 aircraft per month until all aircraft are gone. The XJT CEO signed Skywest's CPA and so now even though the hugely unprofitable branded, charter, and pro-rate flying was gone and all those aircraft were back into CPA flying with CAL again, the low block hour rate from Skywest's CPA still generated a loss for all 244 aircraft. That's when they asked us for concessions, by the way.

Now like I said earlier, I'm willing to give up not having to check in again but it wont be for free. If they want us to check in, acars reassignments, PBS, no b fund, lower 410k matching, lower sick accrual, no OJI bank, no LTD, lower per diem, higher health care premiums, then they will have to give us something of equal value in return.

Originally Posted by Captain Tony
Your financial information is completely incorrect.

You can't count. Try again and tell me how much money 9 figures are.

I noticed you didn't deny you were purchased and made a subsidiary of Atlantic Southeast. Thanks, now let's move on.

The argument about common CEOs has been tried and failed.

Where did I leave my red Swingline????
I didn't mention anything about ASA because its irrelevant. The fact is that Skywest Inc actually created a shell company called Expressjet Delaware and after it bought Expressjet inc holdings, it merged those two companies together with Expresejet being the surviving company. This was all part of the attorneys convincing our mec that the scope and holding letter no longer applies. This was different from how they attempted to buy us the first time in which skywest inc holdings bought expressjet inc holdings and operated them seperately with asa. After Skywest bought xjt and merged it with delaware and having expressjet survive, THEN it began the merger process with ASA, which took about a year. Here let me show you an exerpt of the merger agreement. Dont get confused though, its a merger between expressjet holdings and expressjet delaware.

AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER
THIS AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER, executed this 3rd day of August, 2010 (this “Agreement”), is by and among SkyWest, Inc., a Utah corporation (“Parent”), Express Delaware Merger Co., a Delaware corporation and an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Parent (“Merger Sub,” and together with Parent, the “Parent Parties”), and ExpressJet Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”).
ARTICLE I
THE MERGER
Section 1.1 The Merger. Upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in Article VI, and in accordance with the DGCL, at the Effective Time (as defined in Section 1.2), Merger Sub shall be merged with and into the Company, with the Company surviving the Merger. As a result of the Merger, the separate corporate existence of Merger Sub shall cease and the Company shall continue as the surviving corporation of the Merger (the “Surviving Company”). http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/da...162_1ex2d1.htm


So the CEO of merger sub became the ceo of expressjet holdings. I can also show you where it says that on the merger agreement.

By the way, at least I can admit when I'm wrong. But you kept holding on to the notion that acey had one syllable and then try to say you were just joking.

Anything else Milton?

Originally Posted by Firsttimeflyer
Instead of acting childish, post up some factual data and profits statistics that shows the timeframe that Inc has owned ASA after it bought them from Delta, then post the data from the time ASA/INC purchased XJT.

I'm not the one making the big calls, I'm just point out the facts. One side has made money and had contracts that made money for INC. The other side has not. Its not like I'm making this up or I'm the one that made it happen. Sometimes the truth hurts, luckily I have my helmet. You want to borrow it before you pound your head on your desk?
I don't think that anyone is denying that ASA made money for skywest after it bought it. But keep in mind that skywest also negotiated that asa with DAL and in it, it also has a clause called the 2nd lowest that just so happened to coincide (the first time) very closely with the purchase of xjt. You see, skywest new that their revenues from asa were going to come down. That's part of the reason why they supposedly threw us a bone and said they would merge us with asa this time around instead of keeping us separate. They needed to save money with synergies and spread their costs. But yeah, the other side (lxjt) has not made money. But its not because of the pilots, or any front line employee for that matter. We all took concessions.

Originally Posted by Firsttimeflyer
Just to settle the dispute. ASA purchased Expressjet for $6.75 a share for a total of $133 million.

"In August 2010, SkyWest Inc. announced that it had entered into a definitive merger agreement with ExpressJet Holdings, whereby SkyWest Inc.'s wholly owned subsidiary, Atlantic Southeast Airlines, would purchase ExpressJet for $6.75 per share. Atlantic Southeast Airlines and ExpressJet became the world's largest regional airline on November 12, 2010 once the purchase was final. The self-proclaimed "Super Regional" airline is based in Atlanta."


"This isn't the first time SkyWest has looked at ExpressJet. Back in 2008, SkyWest made an offer for the airline for $3.50 a share. That didn't go through, and today, SkyWest is paying $6.75 a share. Shareholders of ExpressJet should be very happy to have pulled that in. [Update: There was a reverse stock split late in 2008, so the original offer in 2008 would have brought in about $180 million while this will bring in $133 million. I still say the ExpressJet shareholders should be happy about this considering the continued losses at ExpressJet.]"

One more article in case there is any confusion: SkyWest to acquire ExpressJet in continued US regional consolidation | CAPA - Centre for Aviation

"Subsidiary Atlantic Southeast Airlines will acquire all of the outstanding shares of common stock of ExpressJet Holdings, Inc. for USD6.75 per share in cash, representing a net purchase price of approximately USD133 million after accounting for the shares already owned by Atlantic Southeast."
See above but regardless, the point is that it wasn't the president of asa who decided to buy xjt. This was a decision of the skyw bod and its ceo, using its capital to consummate the deal.

Originally Posted by NVUS
Continued losses, even before SkyWest bought them?!! That contradicts everything Nevets says. You can't post stuff that disproves Nevets, the universe will implode in on itself.
See above. It doesn't contradict anything. You just assumed they were right. And I just recently was proven wrong in this thread. Universe is still here.

Originally Posted by Firsttimeflyer
I don't know what he said, but it has been continued losses. Probably the reason XJT was purchased for $50 million less than when they were first looked at by INC.

Speaking of $50 million, that is about what INC is saying Expressjet lost in 2013.

Steer Clear of SkyWest, Inc. (SKYW)
Did you calculate that $50M before or after the reverse stock split?

Last edited by Nevets; 08-25-2014 at 09:27 AM.
Old 08-25-2014 | 09:13 AM
  #7070  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Nevets
I've done it several times here but I'll go through it again. CAL spun off XJT to make some money. They sold it off at $16 CAL/XJT werent able to come to an agreement again, CAL threatened to use their 25% removal clause. XJT called their bluff and CAL proceeded by announcing the removal of 69 aircraft. Except that if CAL did that, XJT had the first right of refusal on those aircraft. That gave birth to XJT's branded flying, the charter department, and the DAL CPA & pro-rate flying. Of course, shortly thereafter the price of oil reached $147 per barrel and there wasn't even a chance to see if it would work after that.




Did you calculate that $50M before or after the reverse stock split?
None of which effects the fact that INC. is showing XJT losing money... something is going away... and LXJT seems intent on painting a target on themselves....
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
12579
Career Questions
44
12-02-2015 11:46 AM
aircraftdriver
Major
15
03-07-2008 09:59 AM
threegreen
Regional
22
02-22-2008 05:33 PM
worldliner777
Major
13
02-22-2008 07:11 AM
skywarrior
Regional
3
11-02-2005 01:16 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices