Frontier Negotiations Discussion
#864
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Position: Bus CA
Posts: 658
GMAFB!
Last edited by DrJekyll MrHyde; 02-04-2018 at 06:20 PM.
#866
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2018
Posts: 224
I honestly don't even know what this thread has turned into, but it has raised my blood pressure significantly. Mostly just due to grammatical errors (just take 1 min to proof read).
I see a lot of people posting, "..that Spirit contract is garbage" "if we get that it's a no for me." ect. Has anybody actually done any work or math?
These figures below are just based on pay at guarantee per month, and for that current seat.
Current Contract Pay: 401K@ 9%: Total per Month:
5 yr CA --- 9,817 --- 884.00 --- 10,700
6 yr CA --- 10,192 --- 917.00 --- 11,109
7 yr CA --- 10,555 --- 959.00 --- 11,505
New TA pay: DC
5 yr CA --- 14,544 --- 1,745 --- 16,289
6 yr CA --- 14,981 --- 1,947 --- 16,929
7 yr CA --- 15,518 --- 2,017 --- 17,535
Just based on that info alone Spirit is looking at anywhere between 55% and 70% increase over current contract based on seat (if you look at all the seats).
If anybody actually wants to do the work they can, but I'll give you the facts right here. If they vote no and then renegotiate for 2 years to just get 100% of what they asked for. The net loss = -145,744 for a 5 year capt over the course of 5 years. The 2 years it would take during negotiations, one would lose out on nearly 160,000. You can't make that up during the next 3 years with only a few dollar per hour increase over what the company proposed.
So in summary...... If Frontier were to get the Spirit contract with our current work rules it is an absolute yes vote for me. For them to get a 55% to 70% overall raise on a contract that is already better than ours then how could we not here? I understand they have PBS, but our company has not brought that up once, and cannot bring it up now.
Also for the people spounting "100% full retro or no vote for me". Please do your homework. No airline ever has gotten full retro. I'm not certain on this so maybe somebody can chime in, but the most retro an airline has gotten was Hawaiin, and that was only roughly 45%
Therapy session complete. Please do your homework, proof read, and try to stay positive. This sucks for all of us I know.
I see a lot of people posting, "..that Spirit contract is garbage" "if we get that it's a no for me." ect. Has anybody actually done any work or math?
These figures below are just based on pay at guarantee per month, and for that current seat.
Current Contract Pay: 401K@ 9%: Total per Month:
5 yr CA --- 9,817 --- 884.00 --- 10,700
6 yr CA --- 10,192 --- 917.00 --- 11,109
7 yr CA --- 10,555 --- 959.00 --- 11,505
New TA pay: DC
5 yr CA --- 14,544 --- 1,745 --- 16,289
6 yr CA --- 14,981 --- 1,947 --- 16,929
7 yr CA --- 15,518 --- 2,017 --- 17,535
Just based on that info alone Spirit is looking at anywhere between 55% and 70% increase over current contract based on seat (if you look at all the seats).
If anybody actually wants to do the work they can, but I'll give you the facts right here. If they vote no and then renegotiate for 2 years to just get 100% of what they asked for. The net loss = -145,744 for a 5 year capt over the course of 5 years. The 2 years it would take during negotiations, one would lose out on nearly 160,000. You can't make that up during the next 3 years with only a few dollar per hour increase over what the company proposed.
So in summary...... If Frontier were to get the Spirit contract with our current work rules it is an absolute yes vote for me. For them to get a 55% to 70% overall raise on a contract that is already better than ours then how could we not here? I understand they have PBS, but our company has not brought that up once, and cannot bring it up now.
Also for the people spounting "100% full retro or no vote for me". Please do your homework. No airline ever has gotten full retro. I'm not certain on this so maybe somebody can chime in, but the most retro an airline has gotten was Hawaiin, and that was only roughly 45%
Therapy session complete. Please do your homework, proof read, and try to stay positive. This sucks for all of us I know.
#868
I honestly don't even know what this thread has turned into, but it has raised my blood pressure significantly. Mostly just due to grammatical errors (just take 1 min to proof read).
I see a lot of people posting, "..that Spirit contract is garbage" "if we get that it's a no for me." ect. Has anybody actually done any work or math?
These figures below are just based on pay at guarantee per month, and for that current seat.
Current Contract Pay: 401K@ 9%: Total per Month:
5 yr CA --- 9,817 --- 884.00 --- 10,700
6 yr CA --- 10,192 --- 917.00 --- 11,109
7 yr CA --- 10,555 --- 959.00 --- 11,505
New TA pay: DC
5 yr CA --- 14,544 --- 1,745 --- 16,289
6 yr CA --- 14,981 --- 1,947 --- 16,929
7 yr CA --- 15,518 --- 2,017 --- 17,535
Just based on that info alone Spirit is looking at anywhere between 55% and 70% increase over current contract based on seat (if you look at all the seats).
If anybody actually wants to do the work they can, but I'll give you the facts right here. If they vote no and then renegotiate for 2 years to just get 100% of what they asked for. The net loss = -145,744 for a 5 year capt over the course of 5 years. The 2 years it would take during negotiations, one would lose out on nearly 160,000. You can't make that up during the next 3 years with only a few dollar per hour increase over what the company proposed.
So in summary...... If Frontier were to get the Spirit contract with our current work rules it is an absolute yes vote for me. For them to get a 55% to 70% overall raise on a contract that is already better than ours then how could we not here? I understand they have PBS, but our company has not brought that up once, and cannot bring it up now.
Also for the people spounting "100% full retro or no vote for me". Please do your homework. No airline ever has gotten full retro. I'm not certain on this so maybe somebody can chime in, but the most retro an airline has gotten was Hawaiin, and that was only roughly 45%
Therapy session complete. Please do your homework, proof read, and try to stay positive. This sucks for all of us I know.
I see a lot of people posting, "..that Spirit contract is garbage" "if we get that it's a no for me." ect. Has anybody actually done any work or math?
These figures below are just based on pay at guarantee per month, and for that current seat.
Current Contract Pay: 401K@ 9%: Total per Month:
5 yr CA --- 9,817 --- 884.00 --- 10,700
6 yr CA --- 10,192 --- 917.00 --- 11,109
7 yr CA --- 10,555 --- 959.00 --- 11,505
New TA pay: DC
5 yr CA --- 14,544 --- 1,745 --- 16,289
6 yr CA --- 14,981 --- 1,947 --- 16,929
7 yr CA --- 15,518 --- 2,017 --- 17,535
Just based on that info alone Spirit is looking at anywhere between 55% and 70% increase over current contract based on seat (if you look at all the seats).
If anybody actually wants to do the work they can, but I'll give you the facts right here. If they vote no and then renegotiate for 2 years to just get 100% of what they asked for. The net loss = -145,744 for a 5 year capt over the course of 5 years. The 2 years it would take during negotiations, one would lose out on nearly 160,000. You can't make that up during the next 3 years with only a few dollar per hour increase over what the company proposed.
So in summary...... If Frontier were to get the Spirit contract with our current work rules it is an absolute yes vote for me. For them to get a 55% to 70% overall raise on a contract that is already better than ours then how could we not here? I understand they have PBS, but our company has not brought that up once, and cannot bring it up now.
Also for the people spounting "100% full retro or no vote for me". Please do your homework. No airline ever has gotten full retro. I'm not certain on this so maybe somebody can chime in, but the most retro an airline has gotten was Hawaiin, and that was only roughly 45%
Therapy session complete. Please do your homework, proof read, and try to stay positive. This sucks for all of us I know.
1. It's "etc." not "ect."
2. It's "spouting", not "spounting".
3. It's "Hawaiian", not "Hawaiin".
4. It's "proofread", not "proof read".
It takes just 1 minute to proofread.
One takeaway from your post that I do agree with is that IF we can keep our current work rules with those pay rates, it does not completely suck. I remember reading somewhere about the Spirit TA that even lineholders can be kept at the airport for up to two hours after a trip for possible reassignment. That type of crap won't fly with me.
#869
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2018
Posts: 224
Careful about pointing fingers...
1. It's "etc." not "ect."
2. It's "spouting", not "spounting".
3. It's "Hawaiian", not "Hawaiin".
4. It's "proofread", not "proof read".
It takes just 1 minute to proofread.
One takeaway from your post that I do agree with is that IF we can keep our current work rules with those pay rates, it does not completely suck. I remember reading somewhere about the Spirit TA that even lineholders can be kept at the airport for up to two hours after a trip for possible reassignment. That type of crap won't fly with me.
1. It's "etc." not "ect."
2. It's "spouting", not "spounting".
3. It's "Hawaiian", not "Hawaiin".
4. It's "proofread", not "proof read".
It takes just 1 minute to proofread.
One takeaway from your post that I do agree with is that IF we can keep our current work rules with those pay rates, it does not completely suck. I remember reading somewhere about the Spirit TA that even lineholders can be kept at the airport for up to two hours after a trip for possible reassignment. That type of crap won't fly with me.
#870
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post