Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Frontier
Frontier Negotiations Discussion >

Frontier Negotiations Discussion

Search
Notices

Frontier Negotiations Discussion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-05-2018, 11:34 AM
  #881  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2016
Posts: 664
Default

Originally Posted by therapysession View Post
So in summary...... If Frontier were to get the Spirit contract with our current work rules it is an absolute yes vote for me.
The problem is, we won’t. Unless those that say we have more leverage than NK because we didn’t have a TRO filed against us are right, I’m afraid if they ratify this they cement our future. They will establish the pattern and it’s a lot lower than we want it to be. I expect a similar TA or one without PBS and less money. Unfortunately.

Please, please please, NC, prove me wrong. Please!
Powderkeg is offline  
Old 02-05-2018, 12:12 PM
  #882  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Mugatu's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2016
Posts: 443
Default

Originally Posted by Duct Mon View Post
Yes, its true i came from Mesa at a time when negotiations were going brutally slow with an MEC and negotiators who were beat down by the process. Their road shows after the TA was announced were filled with the major highlight being pay rates. The rest of the contract was garbage and the pay rates weren't really that significant compared to their peers. I went through hell trying to keep those pilots informed of mgmt trolls on APC and others with nefarious intentions.
You don't have a history on here and haven't proven who's side you're on.
No need to keep comparing only pay rates because thats not the only thing that makes a good TA.
Thanks, Duct Mon. Management is obviously trolling here, pushing what you and I already know. Keep it up!!

Total economic package AND work rules, folks. Look at the whole picture.

We can’t be released soon enough.
Mugatu is offline  
Old 02-05-2018, 12:23 PM
  #883  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Position: Lineholder
Posts: 1,359
Default

Originally Posted by therapysession View Post
I honestly don't even know what this thread has turned into, but it has raised my blood pressure significantly. Mostly just due to grammatical errors (just take 1 min to proof read).

I see a lot of people posting, "..that Spirit contract is garbage" "if we get that it's a no for me." ect. Has anybody actually done any work or math?

These figures below are just based on pay at guarantee per month, and for that current seat.

Current Contract Pay: 401K@ 9%: Total per Month:

5 yr CA --- 9,817 --- 884.00 --- 10,700
6 yr CA --- 10,192 --- 917.00 --- 11,109
7 yr CA --- 10,555 --- 959.00 --- 11,505


New TA pay: DC

5 yr CA --- 14,544 --- 1,745 --- 16,289
6 yr CA --- 14,981 --- 1,947 --- 16,929
7 yr CA --- 15,518 --- 2,017 --- 17,535

Just based on that info alone Spirit is looking at anywhere between 55% and 70% increase over current contract based on seat (if you look at all the seats).

If anybody actually wants to do the work they can, but I'll give you the facts right here. If they vote no and then renegotiate for 2 years to just get 100% of what they asked for. The net loss = -145,744 for a 5 year capt over the course of 5 years. The 2 years it would take during negotiations, one would lose out on nearly 160,000. You can't make that up during the next 3 years with only a few dollar per hour increase over what the company proposed.

So in summary...... If Frontier were to get the Spirit contract with our current work rules it is an absolute yes vote for me. For them to get a 55% to 70% overall raise on a contract that is already better than ours then how could we not here? I understand they have PBS, but our company has not brought that up once, and cannot bring it up now.

Also for the people spounting "100% full retro or no vote for me". Please do your homework. No airline ever has gotten full retro. I'm not certain on this so maybe somebody can chime in, but the most retro an airline has gotten was Hawaiin, and that was only roughly 45%

Therapy session complete. Please do your homework, proof read, and try to stay positive. This sucks for all of us I know.
So much more to an airline contract than pay rates. If the company can change rules in their favor wrt vacation, retirement, provide cheaper hotels and van services, have you pay all your medical insurance costs, control line building, etc., then they will be able to maximize their profits via scheduling while paying you a wage increase most of which they received in revenue from your increase in labor. 117 provides only so much protection.

Plus, the one thing everyone seems to forget is that these contract negotiations occur periodically - who knows what the economic and political climate will be like 5 years from now.

If there was EVER a time to get as much as possible, it’s now.
dracir1 is offline  
Old 02-05-2018, 12:36 PM
  #884  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Posts: 180
Default

Originally Posted by therapysession View Post
I honestly don't even know what this thread has turned into, but it has raised my blood pressure significantly. Mostly just due to grammatical errors (just take 1 min to proof read).

I see a lot of people posting, "..that Spirit contract is garbage" "if we get that it's a no for me." ect. Has anybody actually done any work or math?

These figures below are just based on pay at guarantee per month, and for that current seat.

Current Contract Pay: 401K@ 9%: Total per Month:

5 yr CA --- 9,817 --- 884.00 --- 10,700
6 yr CA --- 10,192 --- 917.00 --- 11,109
7 yr CA --- 10,555 --- 959.00 --- 11,505


New TA pay: DC

5 yr CA --- 14,544 --- 1,745 --- 16,289
6 yr CA --- 14,981 --- 1,947 --- 16,929
7 yr CA --- 15,518 --- 2,017 --- 17,535

Just based on that info alone Spirit is looking at anywhere between 55% and 70% increase over current contract based on seat (if you look at all the seats).

If anybody actually wants to do the work they can, but I'll give you the facts right here. If they vote no and then renegotiate for 2 years to just get 100% of what they asked for. The net loss = -145,744 for a 5 year capt over the course of 5 years. The 2 years it would take during negotiations, one would lose out on nearly 160,000. You can't make that up during the next 3 years with only a few dollar per hour increase over what the company proposed.

So in summary...... If Frontier were to get the Spirit contract with our current work rules it is an absolute yes vote for me. For them to get a 55% to 70% overall raise on a contract that is already better than ours then how could we not here? I understand they have PBS, but our company has not brought that up once, and cannot bring it up now.

Also for the people spounting "100% full retro or no vote for me". Please do your homework. No airline ever has gotten full retro. I'm not certain on this so maybe somebody can chime in, but the most retro an airline has gotten was Hawaiin, and that was only roughly 45%

Therapy session complete. Please do your homework, proof read, and try to stay positive. This sucks for all of us I know.
This is spot on. Why are so many of you getting your panties wadded up by the language related to Spirit’s work rules? You’ve obviously not been paying attention. The only relevant data from Spirit that crosses over to us is the economic piece. Spirit’s transition, PBS, reassignment, etc. are all their own and have no relevance to us. Now their $243/hr blended rate and DC agreements make a major impact on us because of how our business models align. Work rules will be different everywhere and it’s based upon the nuances of the individual operation. I talk to our NC frequently (and they tell me I’m one of the few regulars that do call them consistently) and they’ve tried to make these points clear in their comms. Most of our work rules have been negotiated, as they’ve explained in the newsletters, so I can’t understand why so many people are reacting to the Spirit language like it’s ours!! Use your god-given heads and don’t react!! Think about the nonsense you’re spewing and reach out to these guys. Remember folks...the Spirit deal is not ours! It only provides an economic framework that strengthens our position at the table, AND THE NMB GETS IT!
motorboatin is offline  
Old 02-05-2018, 12:49 PM
  #885  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Posts: 180
Default

Originally Posted by dracir1 View Post
So much more to an airline contract than pay rates. If the company can change rules in their favor wrt vacation, retirement, provide cheaper hotels and van services, have you pay all your medical insurance costs, control line building, etc., then they will be able to maximize their profits via scheduling while paying you a wage increase most of which they received in revenue from your increase in labor. 117 provides only so much protection.

Plus, the one thing everyone seems to forget is that these contract negotiations occur periodically - who knows what the economic and political climate will be like 5 years from now.

If there was EVER a time to get as much as possible, it’s now.
You’re correct in your statements about pay being only one component of the contract. What I don’t get is your slant that we’ll have to agree to what Spirit has in these other sections. Don’t you understand that the areas in which you are b!tching and griping have already been closed out. Reassignment is done, reserve is done, 117 is done, IROP is done, training is done, etc. And how the hell do even dream up something as ignorant as having to pay ALL your medical costs?? Do you really think that the negotiators are so fu#€’ing stupid to do something like that, moreover do think the MEC would then allow that to go to the pilots for a vote? The NC guys have said all along that the mediators would string the Co up by the short and curlys if they tried backing out of the already agreed upon sections- it’s not gonna happen so quit with the ridiculous theories and doom and gloom. And I don’t think anyone has forgotten the fact that negotiations only occur periodically. Why don’t you reach out to the reps and have an awakening experience. Please have a response that’s more original than calling me a troll. Thank you.
motorboatin is offline  
Old 02-05-2018, 04:12 PM
  #886  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 453
Default

Originally Posted by motorboatin View Post
This is spot on. Why are so many of you getting your panties wadded up by the language related to Spirit’s work rules? You’ve obviously not been paying attention. The only relevant data from Spirit that crosses over to us is the economic piece. Spirit’s transition, PBS, reassignment, etc. are all their own and have no relevance to us. Now their $243/hr blended rate and DC agreements make a major impact on us because of how our business models align. Work rules will be different everywhere and it’s based upon the nuances of the individual operation. I talk to our NC frequently (and they tell me I’m one of the few regulars that do call them consistently) and they’ve tried to make these points clear in their comms. Most of our work rules have been negotiated, as they’ve explained in the newsletters, so I can’t understand why so many people are reacting to the Spirit language like it’s ours!! Use your god-given heads and don’t react!! Think about the nonsense you’re spewing and reach out to these guys. Remember folks...the Spirit deal is not ours! It only provides an economic framework that strengthens our position at the table, AND THE NMB GETS IT!
I understand what you're getting at in your last two posts. But since every contract has a total dollar amount stamped on the front cover (so to speak)... Won't Spirit's total contract costs be factored heavily by the NMB in determining our fate?

I'm just asking - because if you're saying we're ahead of Spirit on already closed out work rule sections, wouldn't we be expect to take less on either rates, retirement, scope, insurance, LTD, or what have you?

I just hope the NK pilot's knock it down.
Wheelswatch is offline  
Old 02-05-2018, 06:11 PM
  #887  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Position: Lineholder
Posts: 1,359
Default

Originally Posted by motorboatin View Post
You’re correct in your statements about pay being only one component of the contract. What I don’t get is your slant that we’ll have to agree to what Spirit has in these other sections. Don’t you understand that the areas in which you are b!tching and griping have already been closed out. Reassignment is done, reserve is done, 117 is done, IROP is done, training is done, etc. And how the hell do even dream up something as ignorant as having to pay ALL your medical costs?? Do you really think that the negotiators are so fu#€’ing stupid to do something like that, moreover do think the MEC would then allow that to go to the pilots for a vote? The NC guys have said all along that the mediators would string the Co up by the short and curlys if they tried backing out of the already agreed upon sections- it’s not gonna happen so quit with the ridiculous theories and doom and gloom. And I don’t think anyone has forgotten the fact that negotiations only occur periodically. Why don’t you reach out to the reps and have an awakening experience. Please have a response that’s more original than calling me a troll. Thank you.
Do you really think for one minute that all that’s left to negotiate is pay rates and a few other small items and that NOTHING else can be re-looked into? Really. Vacation is done never to be discussed again regardless of how the pay rate discussion goes?

Honestly, even if you were right, that really doesn’t matter because there is ZERO guarantee that the first AIP that gets sent to a vote will become a TA. Your attitude, if you really are an F9 pilot, is the exact reason I continue to post what I do. Your behavior is defeatist. It’s hopeless. It’s acting scared - like you’d rather settle for some mediocre sh!t then really fight for what you deserve. Youve already decided what the vacation rules will be simply because that was told to you midway through a negotiation.

NCs do NOT make contracts. WE, the pilot FORCE, do. We vote contracts into place. We decide what is good for us. That’s you and I and the other pilots employed by F9. If the first attempt at a contract isn’t good enough, then WE send the NC back for another round.

So I have no idea if you’re a troll or not. But to accept something that you find substandard just because it’s a slight improvement . . . Another word comes to mind for that. Truthfully, I hope this IS a troll post and really not coming from one of my brethren...

BTW, ask some other airlines how much the pilot share is for medical insurance. I never said the company should pay 100% but it should never be this high (and that doesn’t even include the ridiculous family/spouse surcharges).
dracir1 is offline  
Old 02-05-2018, 07:29 PM
  #888  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Posts: 180
Default

Originally Posted by dracir1 View Post
Do you really think for one minute that all that’s left to negotiate is pay rates and a few other small items and that NOTHING else can be re-looked into? Really. Vacation is done never to be discussed again regardless of how the pay rate discussion goes?

Honestly, even if you were right, that really doesn’t matter because there is ZERO guarantee that the first AIP that gets sent to a vote will become a TA. Your attitude, if you really are an F9 pilot, is the exact reason I continue to post what I do. Your behavior is defeatist. It’s hopeless. It’s acting scared - like you’d rather settle for some mediocre sh!t then really fight for what you deserve. Youve already decided what the vacation rules will be simply because that was told to you midway through a negotiation.

NCs do NOT make contracts. WE, the pilot FORCE, do. We vote contracts into place. We decide what is good for us. That’s you and I and the other pilots employed by F9. If the first attempt at a contract isn’t good enough, then WE send the NC back for another round.

So I have no idea if you’re a troll or not. But to accept something that you find substandard just because it’s a slight improvement . . . Another word comes to mind for that. Truthfully, I hope this IS a troll post and really not coming from one of my brethren...

BTW, ask some other airlines how much the pilot share is for medical insurance. I never said the company should pay 100% but it should never be this high (and that doesn’t even include the ridiculous family/spouse surcharges).
My attitude is not defeatist, my attitude is one of reasonability.

Mediocre sh!t?? Negative sir, that’s what we have now. Consider the improvements we’ll gain, not some pie in the sky dream of what you feel as though your entitled. The childhood dream you obviously still cling to of being a revered and well respected airline pilot, died the day you chose to stay a narrow body airbus guy at a sh!thole, greyhoud’esque carrier. It’s just the simple reality.

I think you should also study up on ALPA policy, because we the regular pilots have no voice on what we vote on. The LEC, the voting members of our MEC are the ones who decide what gets voted on and what doesn’t. I’m guessing you’re not one of them, so your high-horse attitude about what the pilots do and don’t do is an oversimplification. Obviously we get to vote on and decide whether a TA ratifies but only after our elected officials feel it is compelling enough to send off in ballot form.

$166 to ($240something) is simply not a slight improvement. It’s over 45% increase, and that doesn’t include the DC!! So maybe ‘slight’ is a relative term, but I don’t think any accountant in the country that did your taxes the year before and then again the year after your new contract would consider your new taxable income base to be ‘slight.’

No, you didn’t say the company should pay 100% of medical. You said “if the company can change rules in their favor with respect to vacation, retirement, provide cheaper hotels and van services, have you pay all your medical insurance costs” You’re creating a hypothetical scenario with a statement like that which shows your lack of understanding, to support your agenda which is to get what YOU want because of what YOU think is most important. That is not how this works. You think the pilots should hold out for unreasonable numbers and improve everything. Well I’ll tell you what brother, I appreciate your wants and desires, but they’re unreasonable. If you were at the controls, sounds like you’d rather hold your ground at $166/hr for eternity because you feel as though you’re owed more than whats currently on the table. Meanwhile you continue to fall further and further behind, thus creating an even more impossible to fix situation. Yes, the proverbial snowball effect.

As an aside, the surcharges, if you’d done any of your homework, do exactly with our healthcare what the F9 business model does with bag fees. It’s an à la carte plan. Pay for what you need. Cut the surcharge and then you socialize the costs of the policy equally to all enrollees. It’s not just a fee that “goes away” because dracir doesn’t like it. Those with kids and a working spouse pay more because they use more of the policy benefits. Get rid of the surcharge, then those without the additional needs help fund those that use more. It’s very simple, but I have a suspicion that you’d be very unhappy paying more every month for your so called brethren just to see the surcharge go away, unless of course you’re one of the guys that has a slew of kids. In that case I’d bet that you’d love to see your brethren pay more to support your family and your life choices.
motorboatin is offline  
Old 02-05-2018, 08:07 PM
  #889  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 541
Default

Pay for what you need. Cut the surcharge and then you socialize the costs of the policy equally to all enrollees. It’s not just a fee that “goes away” because dracir doesn’t like it. Those with kids and a working spouse pay more because they use more of the policy benefits. Get rid of the surcharge, then those without the additional needs help fund those that use more. It’s very simple, but I have a suspicion that you’d be very unhappy paying more every month for your so called brethren just to see the surcharge go away, unless of course you’re one of the guys that has a slew of kids. In that case I’d bet that you’d love to see your brethren pay more to support your family and your life choices.”


I was for the most part agreeing with you until the insurance portion of your rant. I have my “slew” of a whole 2 kids, 3rd is now on the way. So I guess that will make it an enormous multitude of kids. I will have to pay the surcharge in about 7.5 months. Absolutely ridiculous if you ask me. Last I checked the guy paying for a family insurance plan is already “penalized” by paying more than 3x than the single guy is paying. Then you pay the surcharge to make it around 4x the amount. I mean come on, name one other company, airline or not that you personally know that does this. My friends that are pilots and non pilots look at me in utter disbelief when I explain to them the surcharge at F9. Here’s a brillant idea, no surcharges and the company pays all but 20-30% of the premium like almost every other airline that is out there. Earth shattering.
SFA320 is offline  
Old 02-05-2018, 08:29 PM
  #890  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Posts: 180
Default

Originally Posted by dracir1 View Post
Do you really think for one minute that all that’s left to negotiate is pay rates and a few other small items and that NOTHING else can be re-looked into? Really. Vacation is done never to be discussed again regardless of how the pay rate discussion goes?

Honestly, even if you were right, that really doesn’t matter because there is ZERO guarantee that the first AIP that gets sent to a vote will become a TA. Your attitude, if you really are an F9 pilot, is the exact reason I continue to post what I do. Your behavior is defeatist. It’s hopeless. It’s acting scared - like you’d rather settle for some mediocre sh!t then really fight for what you deserve. Youve already decided what the vacation rules will be simply because that was told to you midway through a negotiation.

NCs do NOT make contracts. WE, the pilot FORCE, do. We vote contracts into place. We decide what is good for us. That’s you and I and the other pilots employed by F9. If the first attempt at a contract isn’t good enough, then WE send the NC back for another round.

So I have no idea if you’re a troll or not. But to accept something that you find substandard just because it’s a slight improvement . . . Another word comes to mind for that. Truthfully, I hope this IS a troll post and really not coming from one of my brethren...

BTW, ask some other airlines how much the pilot share is for medical insurance. I never said the company should pay 100% but it should never be this high (and that doesn’t even include the ridiculous family/spouse surcharges).
Originally Posted by SFA320 View Post
Pay for what you need. Cut the surcharge and then you socialize the costs of the policy equally to all enrollees. It’s not just a fee that “goes away” because dracir doesn’t like it. Those with kids and a working spouse pay more because they use more of the policy benefits. Get rid of the surcharge, then those without the additional needs help fund those that use more. It’s very simple, but I have a suspicion that you’d be very unhappy paying more every month for your so called brethren just to see the surcharge go away, unless of course you’re one of the guys that has a slew of kids. In that case I’d bet that you’d love to see your brethren pay more to support your family and your life choices.”


I was for the most part agreeing with you until the insurance portion of your rant. I have my “slew” of a whole 2 kids, 3rd is now on the way. So I guess that will make it an enormous multitude of kids. I will have to pay the surcharge in about 7.5 months. Absolutely ridiculous if you ask me. Last I checked the guy paying for a family insurance plan is already “penalized” by paying more than 3x than the single guy is paying. Then you pay the surcharge to make it around 4x the amount. I mean come on, name one other company, airline or not that you personally know that does this. My friends that are pilots and non pilots look at me in utter disbelief when I explain to them the surcharge at F9. Here’s a brillant idea, no surcharges and the company pays all but 20-30% of the premium like almost every other airline that is out there. Earth shattering.
The company does pay 30%
motorboatin is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
319wisperer
Frontier
9479
06-20-2019 11:31 AM
Ravensvic
Frontier
71
10-18-2012 06:56 PM
alfaromeo
Major
68
06-29-2012 04:16 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices