Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > JetBlue
JetBlue Latest and Greatest >

JetBlue Latest and Greatest

Search
Notices

JetBlue Latest and Greatest

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-03-2021, 12:10 AM
  #11801  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jul 2018
Posts: 34
Default

Originally Posted by Boomer View Post
Doesn’t look like there are any net upgrades in the 320, just 190 and 220.

The EWR Captain slots are all “displacements” from the JFK 320 Captain slots.

All the other 320 bases are roughly net zero for 320 Captains.
You’re misreading it, there are about 130 upgrades in the 320 in total. Because it’s not a displacement bid you can’t go by the negative numbers in the vacancies column, you go by the active vs target pilots columns.

For example, using JFK 320 CA, on 10/1 they will have 655 active, -19 vacancies for a total target of 636. On 12/02 they have a vacancy of -22 but a target of 630. Meaning if 19 guys bid out on 10/1 they won’t backfill them and only need another 6 to leave on the 12/02 vacancy, not the 22 listed.

Edit to add theoretical example…

Since this is not a displacement bid, for every CA that doesn’t change seats, that creates another upgrade. So again just using JFK and EWR as an example. By the end of the year they want 18 less JFK 320 CA’s and 73 more EWR 320 CA’s. So if 18 JFK CA’s move over then that creates 55 upgrades. But theoretically if no current CA’s move over, then that creates 73 upgrades because the negative vacancy numbers are not displacement, just backfills. Again very simplified but shows the difference in this and a displacement bid.

Last edited by BluesClues; 08-03-2021 at 12:52 AM.
BluesClues is offline  
Old 08-03-2021, 09:39 AM
  #11802  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 918
Default

Originally Posted by BluesClues View Post
You’re misreading it, there are about 130 upgrades in the 320 in total. Because it’s not a displacement bid you can’t go by the negative numbers in the vacancies column, you go by the active vs target pilots columns.

For example, using JFK 320 CA, on 10/1 they will have 655 active, -19 vacancies for a total target of 636. On 12/02 they have a vacancy of -22 but a target of 630. Meaning if 19 guys bid out on 10/1 they won’t backfill them and only need another 6 to leave on the 12/02 vacancy, not the 22 listed.

Edit to add theoretical example…

Since this is not a displacement bid, for every CA that doesn’t change seats, that creates another upgrade. So again just using JFK and EWR as an example. By the end of the year they want 18 less JFK 320 CA’s and 73 more EWR 320 CA’s. So if 18 JFK CA’s move over then that creates 55 upgrades. But theoretically if no current CA’s move over, then that creates 73 upgrades because the negative vacancy numbers are not displacement, just backfills. Again very simplified but shows the difference in this and a displacement bid.
And I think overall it becomes a range of 285 upgrades (atleast) to possible 300+ (if current captains remain where they are) for all of 2022
Bgood is offline  
Old 08-03-2021, 11:20 AM
  #11803  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Boomer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: blueJet
Posts: 4,511
Default

Originally Posted by BluesClues View Post
You’re misreading it, there are about 130 upgrades in the 320 in total. Because it’s not a displacement bid you can’t go by the negative numbers in the vacancies column, you go by the active vs target pilots column...
Notice I said “displacement” with quotes around it. I know this isn’t a displacement bid, and you are correct that if no Captains bid EWR than FOs will be upgraded to fill those slots.


The 2022 Vacancy Bid numbers show that the EWR base is not adding Captains to the system - just moving the Captain jobs from JFK. Whether or not the JFK captains bid EWR or stay where they are, the NET result is basically no new Captains in the 320.

Comparing January “Total Pilots” to December “Target Pilots” gives the following:

JFK 697 -> 630 = -67
JFK SQ. 30 -> 25 = -5
BOS 361 -> 338 = -23
BOS SQ 0 -> 24 = +24
EWR 0 -> 73 = +73
LAX 149 -> 169 = +20
FLL 304 -> 291 = -13
MCO 96 -> 102 = +6

JFK needs 72 fewer Captains by the end of 2022. EWR needs 73. That’s a wash.

System-wide there are NET only 15 more 320 Captain slots at the end of 2022 than there are at the beginning of 2022.
Boomer is offline  
Old 08-03-2021, 11:37 AM
  #11804  
Covfefe
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,001
Default

Originally Posted by Boomer View Post
Notice I said “displacement” with quotes around it. I know this isn’t a displacement bid, and you are correct that if no Captains bid EWR than FOs will be upgraded to fill those slots.


The 2022 Vacancy Bid numbers show that the EWR base is not adding Captains to the system - just moving the Captain jobs from JFK. Whether or not the JFK captains bid EWR or stay where they are, the NET result is basically no new Captains in the 320.

Comparing January “Total Pilots” to December “Target Pilots” gives the following:

JFK 697 -> 630 = -67
JFK SQ. 30 -> 25 = -5
BOS 361 -> 338 = -23
BOS SQ 0 -> 24 = +24
EWR 0 -> 73 = +73
LAX 149 -> 169 = +20
FLL 304 -> 291 = -13
MCO 96 -> 102 = +6

JFK needs 72 fewer Captains by the end of 2022. EWR needs 73. That’s a wash.

System-wide there are NET only 15 more 320 Captain slots at the end of 2022 than there are at the beginning of 2022.
Total pilots includes offline pilots. You need to look at active pilots from the first bid period to target pilots (which are only counting target active pilots) for the last one.
BeatNavy is offline  
Old 08-03-2021, 11:37 AM
  #11805  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jul 2018
Posts: 34
Default

Originally Posted by Boomer View Post
Notice I said “displacement” with quotes around it. I know this isn’t a displacement bid, and you are correct that if no Captains bid EWR than FOs will be upgraded to fill those slots.


The 2022 Vacancy Bid numbers show that the EWR base is not adding Captains to the system - just moving the Captain jobs from JFK. Whether or not the JFK captains bid EWR or stay where they are, the NET result is basically no new Captains in the 320.

Comparing January “Total Pilots” to December “Target Pilots” gives the following:

JFK 697 -> 630 = -67
JFK SQ. 30 -> 25 = -5
BOS 361 -> 338 = -23
BOS SQ 0 -> 24 = +24
EWR 0 -> 73 = +73
LAX 149 -> 169 = +20
FLL 304 -> 291 = -13
MCO 96 -> 102 = +6

JFK needs 72 fewer Captains by the end of 2022. EWR needs 73. That’s a wash.

System-wide there are NET only 15 more 320 Captain slots at the end of 2022 than there are at the beginning of 2022.
You’re misreading it again, Total pilots has almost no meaning in this, it’s active pilots to target pilots. That’s all that matters.
BluesClues is offline  
Old 08-03-2021, 11:53 AM
  #11806  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,002
Default

Originally Posted by Boomer View Post
Notice I said “displacement” with quotes around it. I know this isn’t a displacement bid, and you are correct that if no Captains bid EWR than FOs will be upgraded to fill those slots.


The 2022 Vacancy Bid numbers show that the EWR base is not adding Captains to the system - just moving the Captain jobs from JFK. Whether or not the JFK captains bid EWR or stay where they are, the NET result is basically no new Captains in the 320.

Comparing January “Total Pilots” to December “Target Pilots” gives the following:

JFK 697 -> 630 = -67
JFK SQ. 30 -> 25 = -5
BOS 361 -> 338 = -23
BOS SQ 0 -> 24 = +24
EWR 0 -> 73 = +73
LAX 149 -> 169 = +20
FLL 304 -> 291 = -13
MCO 96 -> 102 = +6

JFK needs 72 fewer Captains by the end of 2022. EWR needs 73. That’s a wash.

System-wide there are NET only 15 more 320 Captain slots at the end of 2022 than there are at the beginning of 2022.
72 fewer Captains in JFK?! The net is definitely more than 15. Training center will be very busy next year minus another Covid wave that decimates our industry again.
nuball5 is offline  
Old 08-03-2021, 12:01 PM
  #11807  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Boomer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: blueJet
Posts: 4,511
Default

Gotcha. I wasn’t subtracting the inactive pilots.
Boomer is offline  
Old 08-03-2021, 12:31 PM
  #11808  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,002
Default

Originally Posted by Boomer View Post
Gotcha. I wasn’t subtracting the inactive pilots.

Would be nice if they’d provide a little context/information on the System Bid numbers right? I’ve heard some other airlines do that. It’s not intuitive.
nuball5 is offline  
Old 08-04-2021, 07:29 AM
  #11809  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2019
Posts: 331
Default

So what good is “positive space commute” if the flights are not “selectable” or “available”? Tried to book a commute and the only option was 3 connecting flights…
panpanpan is offline  
Old 08-04-2021, 07:32 AM
  #11810  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Position: fifi whisperer
Posts: 1,255
Default

Originally Posted by panpanpan View Post
So what good is “positive space commute” if the flights are not “selectable” or “available”? Tried to book a commute and the only option was 3 connecting flights…

it means that either
A) the flight is full
B) Salt lake needs to unblock seats

Most folks I know have booked positive space seats a few weeks in advance with good results…..
seekingblue is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Zoomie
Major
36
01-28-2015 11:44 AM
iahflyr
Major
27
09-30-2014 09:04 AM
Mason32
Regional
270
07-27-2010 06:01 PM
Scott34567
Regional
39
05-29-2008 07:08 PM
Sir James
Major
0
07-29-2005 07:02 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices