JetBlue Latest and Greatest
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,001
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2017
Posts: 100
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,236
Ignore the negative numbers they won’t add up correctly. They put those in there to prevent backfill. Like someone else said you need to compare the system bid to this bid. I think you can get a pretty good idea in PVBM by looking at your bid status as of today in each seat and compare the total pilots on that list to the total pilots on the 12/2 supplemental bid. But I could be wrong. The entire system is confusing.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2016
Posts: 359
Ignore the negative numbers they won’t add up correctly. They put those in there to prevent backfill. Like someone else said you need to compare the system bid to this bid. I think you can get a pretty good idea in PVBM by looking at your bid status as of today in each seat and compare the total pilots on that list to the total pilots on the 12/2 supplemental bid. But I could be wrong. The entire system is confusing.
I don't understand this at all. WHY does it have to be confusing? I've been doing this airline thing for a while now and I still can't figure this stuff out. How about they just give us a number, instead of us having to decipher and compare past bids/awards to determine how many seats are available and where.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Posts: 451
I don't understand this at all. WHY does it have to be confusing? I've been doing this airline thing for a while now and I still can't figure this stuff out. How about they just give us a number, instead of us having to decipher and compare past bids/awards to determine how many seats are available and where.
Kinda reminds me of the reserve grids…
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Posts: 597
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2019
Posts: 331
Does anyone know when an award on a vacancy bid is allowed to supersede a previous award?
For example, hypothetically, lets say on last years annual bid a pilot is awarded JFK 320 CA effective 10/1/22 with a training date of 7/1/22. Then, on this current supplemental bid, a pilot can hold FLL 320 FO with an effective date of 8/1/22.
Is this not allowed because the effective date of the FLL 320 FO would be after the training date of the JFK 320 CA? Or is it only not allowed if one has actually started training? Could not find anything in contract. Thanks in advance.
For example, hypothetically, lets say on last years annual bid a pilot is awarded JFK 320 CA effective 10/1/22 with a training date of 7/1/22. Then, on this current supplemental bid, a pilot can hold FLL 320 FO with an effective date of 8/1/22.
Is this not allowed because the effective date of the FLL 320 FO would be after the training date of the JFK 320 CA? Or is it only not allowed if one has actually started training? Could not find anything in contract. Thanks in advance.
Covfefe
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,001
Does anyone know when an award on a vacancy bid is allowed to supersede a previous award?
For example, hypothetically, lets say on last years annual bid a pilot is awarded JFK 320 CA effective 10/1/22 with a training date of 7/1/22. Then, on this current supplemental bid, a pilot can hold FLL 320 FO with an effective date of 8/1/22.
Is this not allowed because the effective date of the FLL 320 FO would be after the training date of the JFK 320 CA? Or is it only not allowed if one has actually started training? Could not find anything in contract. Thanks in advance.
For example, hypothetically, lets say on last years annual bid a pilot is awarded JFK 320 CA effective 10/1/22 with a training date of 7/1/22. Then, on this current supplemental bid, a pilot can hold FLL 320 FO with an effective date of 8/1/22.
Is this not allowed because the effective date of the FLL 320 FO would be after the training date of the JFK 320 CA? Or is it only not allowed if one has actually started training? Could not find anything in contract. Thanks in advance.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post