Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Delta Pilots Association >

Delta Pilots Association

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Delta Pilots Association

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-06-2011, 01:08 PM
  #4351  
On Reserve
 
0RAC's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2010
Position: I'm in a box
Posts: 19
Default

Originally Posted by scambo1
ORAC;

I read the passage several times. Please point out the part where scope is discussed.
Section 1 aka the Scope section of your contract is way bigger than that richard-head stole my flying. Code share, joint ventures, mergers, change in control, successorship, fragmentation and other legalese terms like this are all scope issues. If your contract doesn't have this kind of language ask your buddy for his and actually read it. This is big picture stuff. It is ALL scope. Ask a UAL guy how that Aer Lingus part of their scope language works. If you can't see beyond the aluminum tube measuring contest, then you're missing part of what scope means. Read your Section 1 today.
0RAC is offline  
Old 02-06-2011, 01:27 PM
  #4352  
The Brown Dot +1
 
scambo1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: 777B
Posts: 7,775
Default

Originally Posted by 0RAC
Section 1 aka the Scope section of your contract is way bigger than that richard-head stole my flying. Code share, joint ventures, mergers, change in control, successorship, fragmentation and other legalese terms like this are all scope issues. If your contract doesn't have this kind of language ask your buddy for his and actually read it. This is big picture stuff. It is ALL scope. Ask a UAL guy how that Aer Lingus part of their scope language works. If you can't see beyond the aluminum tube measuring contest, then you're missing part of what scope means. Read your Section 1 today.

I actually read my section 1 last week. Cabotage and open skies is a whole lot different from scope. Those are national policies, not corporate contracts.

You talk as if I cannot comprehend what I read, I would recommend you try to do some research before you type.
scambo1 is offline  
Old 02-06-2011, 02:45 PM
  #4353  
On Reserve
 
0RAC's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2010
Position: I'm in a box
Posts: 19
Default

Originally Posted by scambo1
I actually read my section 1 last week. Cabotage and open skies is a whole lot different from scope. Those are national policies, not corporate contracts.
No it's not. Scope protects us from those things. In fact our contracts protect us from a lot of outside influences. That's the point of the contract. Protection.

You talk as if I cannot comprehend what I read, I would recommend you try to do some research before you type.
You're reading into my language where it does not exist. I was not saying anything about you, just saying that Scope protects you from being screwed by the very things you mention. We should be looking past the trees into the forest and then beyond the forest.

Look at British Airways - Openskies and United - Aer Lingus.

Their scope language permitted both of these to happen...
0RAC is offline  
Old 02-06-2011, 06:41 PM
  #4354  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

To navigate a forest of trees pay attention the holes between the tress not the trees themselves.
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 02-06-2011, 06:46 PM
  #4355  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by 0RAC
No it's not. Scope protects us from those things. In fact our contracts protect us from a lot of outside influences. That's the point of the contract. Protection.
For everyone else besides 0RAC, there is no Scope clause that protects us from Cabotage or intergovernmental open skies agreement.

For 0RAC: You're in a hole...stop digging.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 02-06-2011, 08:07 PM
  #4356  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
To navigate a forest of trees pay attention the holes between the tress not the trees themselves.

That was deep.
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 02-06-2011, 08:28 PM
  #4357  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
That was deep.
Deep Thoughts by ACL.
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 02-06-2011, 08:56 PM
  #4358  
On Reserve
 
0RAC's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2010
Position: I'm in a box
Posts: 19
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
For everyone else besides 0RAC, there is no Scope clause that protects us from Cabotage or intergovernmental open skies agreement.

For 0RAC: You're in a hole...stop digging.

Carl
Then explain why Aer Lingus isn't flying Delta flights with outsourced non-union employees, but flew United's? JV issues are Section 1 issues. That is scope, like it or not. I don't have time to pull the United scope grievance, but here's some quick Googles for you. Could this same thing happen to you at Delta or does your Scope language protect you?

"United's pilots have the contractual right to handle its flying. But one exception to this rule, negotiated during United's three-year bankruptcy, applies to joint ventures formed by United and Star Alliance partners, such as Aer Lingus."

Crews Protest United/Aer Lingus Job Outsourcing
0RAC is offline  
Old 02-07-2011, 06:02 AM
  #4359  
Gets Weekends Off
 
shiznit's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: right for a long, long time
Posts: 2,642
Default

Originally Posted by 0RAC
Then explain why Aer Lingus isn't flying Delta flights with outsourced non-union employees, but flew United's? JV issues are Section 1 issues. That is scope, like it or not. I don't have time to pull the United scope grievance, but here's some quick Googles for you. Could this same thing happen to you at Delta or does your Scope language protect you?

"United's pilots have the contractual right to handle its flying. But one exception to this rule, negotiated during United's three-year bankruptcy, applies to joint ventures formed by United and Star Alliance partners, such as Aer Lingus."

Crews Protest United/Aer Lingus Job Outsourcing
That is clearly JV flying, NOT open skies agreements or cabotage.

They are different. No pilot contract Section 1 protects you against open skies or cabotage.

JV flying is something that can be regulated via Section 1.

Apples and oranges.
shiznit is offline  
Old 02-07-2011, 06:34 AM
  #4360  
The Brown Dot +1
 
scambo1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: 777B
Posts: 7,775
Default

In ORAC's defense, I think he is focused on this:

OpenSkies - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Not this:

Open skies - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The first is a British Airways alter ego company, the second is the Open Skies accord. If after reading both and the previous posts, he thinks section 1 covers each, then there is nothing left to say.
scambo1 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lbell911
Regional
23
04-22-2012 10:33 AM
WatchThis!
Major
68
07-13-2008 08:12 AM
757Driver
Mergers and Acquisitions
190
04-19-2008 11:27 AM
WatchThis!
Mergers and Acquisitions
2
04-14-2008 07:25 PM
RockBottom
Major
5
04-13-2006 05:14 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices