PSA info
05-11-2016 | 02:44 PM
#2783
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 480
Likes: 0
New rumor has that our higher up came into a recurrent class to say that there will be no more 700's and likely return of their 700's back to them if need be. 200 won't get parked and possibly no ORD base.
I can see it now. "Envoy steals psa's envoy 700's" hahaha
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I can see it now. "Envoy steals psa's envoy 700's" hahaha
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
05-11-2016 | 03:10 PM
#2784
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,244
Likes: 0
That's why I said rumor. Just passing on the rumor started in the forum. But reality it all makes sense if we can't staff. That's the obvious
05-11-2016 | 03:29 PM
#2785
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
It would be a commutable base.
05-11-2016 | 03:36 PM
#2786
On Reserve
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Pretty sure you read my message wrong, but I'll clarify. The C-Series order will be flown by mainline Delta pilots and the routes will replace the need for regional flights. My point being that with fewer regional flights Delta will not need to continue offering the retention bonuses to Endeavor when they expire in a year and a half. At that point, Endeavor returns to industry lowest pay rates.
05-11-2016 | 05:02 PM
#2787
On Reserve
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
So what's our pitch there? Come work at the lowest paid company based in ord? I'd love ord personally, but do we really think this will fix things? Another "not quite" fix in the works.
05-11-2016 | 05:10 PM
#2788
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
05-11-2016 | 07:31 PM
#2790
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
From: Cl65 left
Here is how I see it, feel free to comment.
1) Parker only wants cheapest way.
2) Parker dupes PSA into low pay contract.
3) Parker makes decent investment in new CR9's.
4) PSA ultimately can't attract pilots because of low pay.
Part two: Considering the above facts. How does Doug wreep more cost benefits by moving the aircraft to another more expensive contract carrier, or mainline, rather than increasing PSA FO compensation to an attractive level?
1) Parker only wants cheapest way.
2) Parker dupes PSA into low pay contract.
3) Parker makes decent investment in new CR9's.
4) PSA ultimately can't attract pilots because of low pay.
Part two: Considering the above facts. How does Doug wreep more cost benefits by moving the aircraft to another more expensive contract carrier, or mainline, rather than increasing PSA FO compensation to an attractive level?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JetJock16
Regional
63
04-08-2016 05:05 PM
