Anything less than $25.56 is a pay cut for anyone on property in the past 2 years. And even at $25.56, it's still less pay than the more senior guys got back in the day, right?
I'll vote no for anything less than $25.56. I was hired at 75 hours guarantee, I get paid at 75 hours, and I see anything based on 83 or 85 hours as a pay cut, period.
And don't give me any of that BS about the 401K increased contribution. It might be a good thing. It might not. Won't know until one is taking it out. Had anyone here tried to take money from their 401K in 2007/2008, they would have lost their pants. Many have just started breaking even in the past year or two.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bartok
Most people will benefit much more with a pure hourly rate.
Pay proposals (on top of current book) monthly:
Union ($23 per hr)
75 - $1725
80 - $1840
85 - $1955
90 - $2070
95 - $2185
100 - $2300
Company ($23000 salary)
75 - $1916
80 - $1916
85 - $1916
90 - $1916
95 - $1916
100 - $1916
I'm not working for free.