Search
Notices
SkyWest Regional Airline

Skywest v2.0

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-01-2016, 08:14 AM
  #2931  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Turbosina's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Position: Guppy Gear Slinger
Posts: 1,852
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
Someone with an SIC type is trainable and either...

1) Employed by a competitor.
2) Highly employable by a competitor.

There's benefit to pulling pilots out of either category.

$7500 is cheap compared to hiring some random CFI who might wash out after 100 hours of IOE.
An SIC type requires 3 takeoffs and landings, some single engine work and a little ground instruction. I've got two in large-cabin bizjets, and I can't imagine what it proves. Earning one's CFI is vastly more difficult. Heck, even the CFII add-on is more difficult.

Anyhow, it's news to me that the bonus covers SIC types. Wow.
Turbosina is offline  
Old 09-01-2016, 08:19 AM
  #2932  
Ich bin Pilot von Beruf
 
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Position: CRJ Kapitän
Posts: 616
Default

Originally Posted by Turbosina View Post
Oh come on, an SIC type is a total joke and everyone knows it. I have two and they're not worth anything. I have to think the bonus only applies to PIC types, but if SKW is dumb enough to be paying bonuses to guys with useless SIC types, then, well...
Your attitude here is really telling about your character and proclivity to learning.

My SIC Lear 35 ride was harder than my SkyWest CL-65 PIC ride. It was essentially the same ride with the same maneuvers as what I experienced at SkyWest, except that we didn't use autopilots or flight directors...and the Learjet is a much tougher aircraft to master. That one took place in a Flight Safety simulator. I thought my SKW CL-65 ride was so easy due to autopilots....

My CASA 212 and Falcon 20 SIC rides were all conducted in the actual airplane and gave me very valuable experience which the PIC CL-65 ride in a simulator never provided. Some of the maneuvers and approaches were conducted in actual instrument conditions.
Duesenflieger is offline  
Old 09-01-2016, 08:27 AM
  #2933  
Ich bin Pilot von Beruf
 
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Position: CRJ Kapitän
Posts: 616
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
Someone with an SIC type is trainable and either...

1) Employed by a competitor.
2) Highly employable by a competitor.

There's benefit to pulling pilots out of either category.

$7500 is cheap compared to hiring some random CFI who might wash out after 100 hours of IOE.
True, plus someone with an SIC rating from 135 stuff likely has some good experience to offer the airlines! I came into SkyWest with a lot of valuable real world experience flying turboprop/jet aircraft all over North America...thanks to my worthless SIC ratings. Unfortunately I got on before the bonus was offered to 135/SIC rated guys, but oh well that's life
Duesenflieger is offline  
Old 09-01-2016, 09:22 AM
  #2934  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,293
Default

Originally Posted by Turbosina View Post
An SIC type requires 3 takeoffs and landings, some single engine work and a little ground instruction. I've got two in large-cabin bizjets, and I can't imagine what it proves. Earning one's CFI is vastly more difficult. Heck, even the CFII add-on is more difficult.

CFI is more work, but not every piston prop pilot can handle the speed and complexity of a glass jet. Apples to oranges.

A type rating is a good indicator for training success, which saves money and maximizes staffing. A pilot hired in the fall to staff the holidays who washes out on Dec 15th can't be replaced in time.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 09-01-2016, 09:23 AM
  #2935  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 120
Default

Is there a simple place to look up, what airframes are based at which bases?
Rob12345 is offline  
Old 09-01-2016, 09:25 AM
  #2936  
MK Ultra Candidate
Thread Starter
 
ClickClickBoom's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Position: Prime Leader of Boko Harumph
Posts: 1,167
Default

Originally Posted by Rob12345 View Post
Is there a simple place to look up, what airframes are based at which bases?
yes...........
ClickClickBoom is offline  
Old 09-01-2016, 09:28 AM
  #2937  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2015
Posts: 260
Default

Originally Posted by Rob12345 View Post
Is there a simple place to look up, what airframes are based at which bases?
CRJ: Every Domicile we have. Subject to change with PDX going all 175.
ERJ: ORD, DEN, PDX, SEA, SFO, LAX
TogaParty is offline  
Old 09-01-2016, 09:30 AM
  #2938  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 120
Default

Originally Posted by TogaParty View Post
CRJ: Every Domicile we have. Subject to change with PDX going all 175.
ERJ: ORD, DEN, PDX, SEA, SFO, LAX
Big Thanks!
Rob12345 is offline  
Old 09-01-2016, 10:58 AM
  #2939  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Turbosina's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Position: Guppy Gear Slinger
Posts: 1,852
Default

Originally Posted by Duessenflieger View Post
Your attitude here is really telling about your character and proclivity to learning.
Really? Hmm. I must not know much 'bout learnin', given that I've co-founded and successfully ran one of the largest flight schools on the left coast, taking a 3-airplane Part 61 flying club to a 30-airplane Part 141 school with more students than we could possibly count and a perfect safety record.

Yup, don't know much 'bout learnin'. No siree.

And I stand by my perspective on an SIC type rating. You stand by yours. We'll all be happy.
Turbosina is offline  
Old 09-01-2016, 11:55 AM
  #2940  
Ich bin Pilot von Beruf
 
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Position: CRJ Kapitän
Posts: 616
Default

Originally Posted by Turbosina View Post
Really? Hmm. I must not know much 'bout learnin', given that I've co-founded and successfully ran one of the largest flight schools on the left coast, taking a 3-airplane Part 61 flying club to a 30-airplane Part 141 school with more students than we could possibly count and a perfect safety record.

Yup, don't know much 'bout learnin'. No siree.

And I stand by my perspective on an SIC type rating. You stand by yours. We'll all be happy.
I don't care what you've founded, you are quite simply utterly wrong in your assessment that an SIC type rating is worthless. And we all know that not all school founders are the best teachers that exist. Perhaps the company that helped you receive yours did not put too much of an investment in its pilots. That is too bad. All I know is that mine were all earned with equal sweat and fear of failure as my SkyWest CL-65 ride. I wouldn't be the pilot that I am today without having earned them. I'm not trying to get on your case here personally, but your original statement was not very thought out all too well. Let us leave it at that.

Last edited by Duesenflieger; 09-01-2016 at 12:17 PM.
Duesenflieger is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ghilis101
SkyWest
72
06-11-2019 03:53 PM
JoeyMeatballs
Regional
160
04-28-2008 06:45 PM
Ellen
Regional
15
05-15-2007 09:53 AM
JustAMushroom
Regional
65
07-16-2006 10:44 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices