Search

Notices
SkyWest Regional Airline

Skywest v2.0

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-19-2016 | 11:03 AM
  #3821  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
Default

Skywest is not yet "struggling to find people". Could it happen this next year? Sure it could and I hope it does. Best that we could ask for is Skywest beginning to have trouble hiring right before contract negotiations.
Old 10-19-2016 | 11:05 AM
  #3822  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 199
Likes: 7
From: Right Side Up
Default

Originally Posted by Squallrider
United said 1200 minimum next year recently
Even better!

Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk
Old 10-19-2016 | 11:07 AM
  #3823  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by soakingpilot
Never said it was better at AA if you could find that for me and requote me please. I have only been pointing out what these new policies at skw really are. You have an issue with that ? Ok, but I'm looking for us all at skw to get compensated correctly and not get their streams crossed with these "amazing" benefits for the skw pilot group which is what I was responding too.
But thanks.
In your comparisons it was obvious that you were implying that you want Skywest to have things that other places have while knocking the new improvements as not good enough. I deduced that you wanted those things because you believe they are better than what you have now (because why would you want something that's not better? Right?)
Old 10-19-2016 | 11:17 AM
  #3824  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Majerus
The current washout rate is 6% not 20%
I didn't suggest that the wash out rate is that high... just that we didn't hire 80-100 a month. Check the seniority list for an accurate picture.

It is still a pretty good clip at which we are hiring. Just not as steep as some people want us to make believe. At the end of the day it doesn't matter if people wash out or leave after 3 months once they have checked the 121 box. You really want to know who is still here after year 1 to get a reliable picture of our talent acquisition potential. The rest is just friction that taxes the system.
Old 10-19-2016 | 11:19 AM
  #3825  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,888
Likes: 684
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by soakingpilot
In fact I'm good with my seniorty already at SKW but do I want what others are getting for me and everyone else but not sure why you Rickair7777 are so against that? Then again you say most regional pilots dont care about first year pay or sign ons ? well as you said yourself "there's a reason for those bonuses"

Next.
I'm all for free money, just no more for new-hires because that comes at the expense of all the rest of us who have committed years of our lives to this company.

Across-the-board raises of any sort are of course great.

I'm not enthused about retention bonuses, keep in mind that pilot pay is mostly a zero-sum game, that is any compensation to any part of the group comes at the expense of the rest of the group.

What bonuses allow the company to do is to redirect compensation to certain pilots SO AS TO BENEFIT THE COMPANY. This is done AT THE EXPENSE OF OTHER PILOTS.

Retention bonuses, assuming you have to obligate to work for a period of time, have two issues...

1. An upwardly mobile pilot really cannot lock himself into place. What if DAL calls? So he won't take the bonus. The people who will take the bonuses are generally folks who were staying anyway so two pilots doing the same job are getting different pay with no real benefit to the company.

2. No regional can offer bonuses which would come anywhere near the lifetime compensation of a major airline pilot. So retention bonuses will ultimately not work anyway.

I'd rather just have the entire pay scale raised across the board.

You cannot lose sight of the fact that regional pilot pay is zero-sum...they're only giving us X amount of money as a group so think carefully about how it's allocated.
Old 10-19-2016 | 11:23 AM
  #3826  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
Default

^^^^^^^^^^^ right on
Old 10-19-2016 | 12:20 PM
  #3827  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
Default

Rickair is absolutely correct. There is no amount of bonus that will keep someone from taking a job with Delta or United. SW knows this (why do you think the pilot bonus is not pro-rated?) and you will not get anything here without giving something up. The fact that both of these were just given to the pilot group should tell you either a) it is a zero sum for the company and doesn't cost a dime and/or b) it only benefits the company in some direct/indirect way. I'd be careful about claiming any benefit to the pilot group or SGU will come back on the next round of negotiations and demand something in return!

With new hires, it doesn't really matter how much they hire, there is only so much that the training department can do. There are some military pilots that are not even making it to IOE before they are hired by a legacy. On top of that, there was just someone a couple pages back saying that they haven't flown since getting off IOE. The game has changed and like always, SGU is slow to react. LCA's will continue to get hired away which will plug the training pipeline even more. I think you will know that the proverbial poop has truly hit the fan when SGU starts to work with the pilot group vs openly antagonizing them every chance they get. When reserve re-write, working with SAPA or other pilot wins (like parking allotment or commuter hotels) start to occur, you will know that SGU has finally seen the writing on the wall and being proactive at maintaining their status as the top regional.

Of course, there are always those that either have a sweet gig in the training department or other connections that will argue about how bad other places have it. I just don't understand why you wouldn't want the best for the pilot GROUP, even if it doesn't impact you personally. This of course does not apply to new hire bonuses. This cost should fall on SGU management and management only. The pilot group should not give anything up to help keep people coming in the door.
Old 10-19-2016 | 01:35 PM
  #3828  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Default

Would it be possible to sit reserve right out of training at either: kslc kfat kpdx or kden ? Where are all the new hires going ?
Old 10-19-2016 | 01:44 PM
  #3829  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
Default

Maybe Fresno on the CRJ. SLC shorty after. Portland on the ERJ, maybe. Denver, no.
Old 10-19-2016 | 01:45 PM
  #3830  
Dumb Pilot
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
From: Broke
Default

Originally Posted by Squallrider
80-100 new hires a month is struggling? Yea ok you should research class sizes anywhere else
They have not had close to those numbers in a while. Attrition is even starting to out pace hiring as of last month.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ghilis101
SkyWest
72
06-11-2019 03:53 PM
JoeyMeatballs
Regional
160
04-28-2008 06:45 PM
Ellen
Regional
15
05-15-2007 09:53 AM
JustAMushroom
Regional
65
07-16-2006 10:44 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices