Search

Notices

Hard Sell

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-17-2023 | 09:19 AM
  #251  
hoover's Avatar
At your mom's house
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,675
Likes: 449
From: cpt 737
Default

Originally Posted by KaraokeMan
I’m new and may be missing something, but looking at bmrd’s post history, how does this possibly have any credibility??
epic troll post it seems
got everyone real worked up
its because everyone is already spending the retro check and is champing at the bit to vote yes.
Months ago when the company put out the pay scale everyone scoffed at the rates and now the rumored rates are barely anymore and everyone is asking how soon to vote yes.
I get we're all over this being dragged out but in the morning after the vote I dont want to have to do a walk of shame because I made a bad decision the night before.
Reply
Old 12-17-2023 | 09:19 AM
  #252  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 769
Likes: 77
Default

Originally Posted by Cnflys
757 rates are not sufficient. They aren't much higher than 737 rates. If we are going to be industry leading career compensation, rates (FO and Captain) need to be somewhere between 757 and true widebody rates (A350) to account for the reality that our pilots have no opportunity to move to the higher widebody payscales. This would also help compensate for our long upgrade times. Even if everything else in a proposed contract is good, 757 rates would be a hard no for me.
This is true. While we've been going back and forth about this supposed rate, we hopefully can all agree (and I know pollyannas don't) that just above 75 rate is entirely too low for both seats. Unfortunately, I know what this group will do. They do it every time. Come back in 3-4 weeks and prove me wrong. Hopefully when it's all said and done, the yessies will at least have the stones to own up to what they did.
Reply
Old 12-17-2023 | 09:30 AM
  #253  
Gets Weekend Reserve
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,259
Likes: 240
From: B737CA
Default

Originally Posted by MudhammedCJ
This is true. While we've been going back and forth about this supposed rate, we hopefully can all agree (and I know pollyannas don't) that just above 75 rate is entirely too low for both seats. Unfortunately, I know what this group will do. They do it every time. Come back in 3-4 weeks and prove me wrong. Hopefully when it's all said and done, the yessies will at least have the stones to own up to what they did.

What makes 757 rate too low, or too much, or even the target? Sure, gives us something to shoot for, but then as the end game, I’d rather look at this from this perspective…. what does an ADG-only paying or equivalent trip pay here vs. OAL’s?

If a Delta 757 captain flew a min paying rigged 4 day that earned him 8k, and we did the same, what’s the pay difference? Then start adding other things…. rates in and of itself may or may not mean as much once we have the big picture.
Reply
Old 12-17-2023 | 09:36 AM
  #254  
ZapBrannigan's Avatar
Furloughed Again?!
15 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,948
Likes: 109
From: Boeing 737
Default

Originally Posted by Cnflys
757 rates are not sufficient. They aren't much higher than 737 rates. If we are going to be industry leading career compensation, rates (FO and Captain) need to be somewhere between 757 and true widebody rates (A350) to account for the reality that our pilots have no opportunity to move to the higher widebody payscales. This would also help compensate for our long upgrade times. Even if everything else in a proposed contract is good, 757 rates would be a hard no for me.
well you definitely picked the right airline then. I mean if you were expecting wodebody pay, first thing that pops into my mind is "I should apply at a discount LCC that only flies 737s" 🤣🤣🤣
Reply
Old 12-17-2023 | 09:49 AM
  #255  
mulcher's Avatar
gets time off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 94
Default

Originally Posted by ZapBrannigan
well you definitely picked the right airline then. I mean if you were expecting wodebody pay, first thing that pops into my mind is "I should apply at a discount LCC that only flies 737s" 🤣🤣🤣
Funny thing is. When many were hired they made more than WB pay.
Reply
Old 12-17-2023 | 10:01 AM
  #256  
Gets Weekends Off
5 Years
Line Holder
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 4,163
Likes: 144
Default

Originally Posted by mulcher
Who said they had no issues with the FO pay before? Nice ASSumption!
Is this a serious question? The voted rates mean anyone who voted yes must have been OK with FO’s lagging.
Reply
Old 12-17-2023 | 10:04 AM
  #257  
Gets Weekend Reserve
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,259
Likes: 240
From: B737CA
Default

Originally Posted by mulcher
Funny thing is. When many were hired they made more than WB pay.
Hence the importance of the work rules and soft money way more so than just rates…. hence undecided.
Reply
Old 12-17-2023 | 10:11 AM
  #258  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,033
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Cyio
Is this a serious question? The voted rates mean anyone who voted yes must have been OK with FO’s lagging.
Including the FOs............
Reply
Old 12-17-2023 | 10:14 AM
  #259  
New Hire
 
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ZapBrannigan
well you definitely picked the right airline then. I mean if you were expecting wodebody pay, first thing that pops into my mind is "I should apply at a discount LCC that only flies 737s" 🤣🤣🤣
Didn't say I was expecting widebody pay. I said that I expect career compensation at SWA to be as much or more than the industry leaders. Be it a 20, 30, or 40 year career.
Reply
Old 12-17-2023 | 10:18 AM
  #260  
Gets Weekends Off
5 Years
Line Holder
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 4,163
Likes: 144
Default

Originally Posted by SlipKid
Including the FOs............
That wasn’t the argument I was responding to. I wasn’t here to understand the reasoning behind an FO voting yes.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Dave Behnke
FedEx
36
07-03-2023 08:54 PM
nfo99
United
56
06-28-2022 08:07 AM
vagabond
Hangar Talk
2
01-06-2012 08:15 AM
SkyHigh
Hangar Talk
49
12-15-2008 02:56 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices