Negligent accounting
#21
Line Holder
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 147
#22
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,603
Likes: 0
How do we convince the company that we deserve more?? What ammo do we give the NC for that “battle”??
If this gets voted down it will be at least a 3 month process to get a survey done then how long to schedule more dates with the NMB when classes are being filled with our current CBA.
In a year maybe or maybe longer get $5 more an hour and losing a descent amount of cash.
Well in that time frame we are just gonna give Spirit Mgt more of a bonus by working under the current CBA.
If this gets voted down it will be at least a 3 month process to get a survey done then how long to schedule more dates with the NMB when classes are being filled with our current CBA.
In a year maybe or maybe longer get $5 more an hour and losing a descent amount of cash.
Well in that time frame we are just gonna give Spirit Mgt more of a bonus by working under the current CBA.
#23
Finally a few posts that actually make sense.
Voting out of FEAR is self defeating.
This needs to fail with a strong NO vote to send a clear message to the NC and the company.
It's not only about asking for more, but rather giving up less.
These giveaways will never come back and are not worth the raises offered.
The company savings more that make up for the 40%.
The NC is beaten down by the hostile environment, sued and exhausted.
They did their best under the circumstances.
Time to send a message that we are not willing to work under these rules for the rest of our Spirit careers.
No schedule integrity, PBS, NO RES drops, out of base reserve, NO TX, all are money savers for the next many years which will never be regained.
We need to think long term and avoid the money grabbing temptation.
Voting out of FEAR is self defeating.
This needs to fail with a strong NO vote to send a clear message to the NC and the company.
It's not only about asking for more, but rather giving up less.
These giveaways will never come back and are not worth the raises offered.
The company savings more that make up for the 40%.
The NC is beaten down by the hostile environment, sued and exhausted.
They did their best under the circumstances.
Time to send a message that we are not willing to work under these rules for the rest of our Spirit careers.
No schedule integrity, PBS, NO RES drops, out of base reserve, NO TX, all are money savers for the next many years which will never be regained.
We need to think long term and avoid the money grabbing temptation.
#24
Finally a few posts that actually make sense.
Voting out of FEAR is self defeating.
This needs to fail with a strong NO vote to send a clear message to the NC and the company.
It's not only about asking for more, but rather giving up less.
These giveaways will never come back and are not worth the raises offered.
The company savings more that make up for the 40%.
The NC is beaten down by the hostile environment, sued and exhausted.
They did their best under the circumstances.
Time to send a message that we are not willing to work under these rules for the rest of our Spirit careers.
No schedule integrity, PBS, NO RES drops, out of base reserve, NO TX, all are money savers for the next many years which will never be regained.
We need to think long term and avoid the money grabbing temptation.
Voting out of FEAR is self defeating.
This needs to fail with a strong NO vote to send a clear message to the NC and the company.
It's not only about asking for more, but rather giving up less.
These giveaways will never come back and are not worth the raises offered.
The company savings more that make up for the 40%.
The NC is beaten down by the hostile environment, sued and exhausted.
They did their best under the circumstances.
Time to send a message that we are not willing to work under these rules for the rest of our Spirit careers.
No schedule integrity, PBS, NO RES drops, out of base reserve, NO TX, all are money savers for the next many years which will never be regained.
We need to think long term and avoid the money grabbing temptation.
#25
Gets Weekend Reserve
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,276
Likes: 273
From: B737CA
You go back and start with the failed TA as a basis and go up from there.
No. You vote this down and you either fire or redirect your NC to renegotiate a new TA.
The NMB's job is to "close the deal." They couldn't care less if it's fair or not. They want a deal put out for a vote and hopefully closed. That's how they measure success, period, end of story. A deal being voted down brings them back and they want this deal done. Your most recent precedents of what happens after TA gets shot down are Delta and Southwest. I'm at Southwest. We essentially started over with a new NC, and new leadership and had a new and FAR superior TA about 9 months later. You couldn't even compare the two TA's, the first one was indeed THAT bad.
The mediators are allowed to lie and misdirect "in the interest of spurring the negotiations." That's why they use fear, uncertainty and doubt as one of their main tools, but in the end, it all lies with the membership and how you vote. They cannot coerce you into voting yes, but they can and do use your ignorance to their advantage simply to conclude the mediation.
Either this offer is adequate, or it's inadequate in relations to your peers. Either you're discount pilots or you're not. That's how the vote should go.
Pound our chest like fools and demand more??
How do you suggest we do that??
How do you suggest we do that??
How do you suggest we convince an anti labor NMB that we are worth more and company should just pay us or change this?? How do we do that??
The T/A could be 200% better but how do we convince an anti labor friendly NMB??
Let’s say we vote this down and maybe a year down the road we kick thousands aside for little gain or what if the economy tanks?? I can guarantee you the next offer will be even more sub par.
People need to pull their heads out of their asses and think long term.
The T/A could be 200% better but how do we convince an anti labor friendly NMB??
Let’s say we vote this down and maybe a year down the road we kick thousands aside for little gain or what if the economy tanks?? I can guarantee you the next offer will be even more sub par.
People need to pull their heads out of their asses and think long term.
The mediators are allowed to lie and misdirect "in the interest of spurring the negotiations." That's why they use fear, uncertainty and doubt as one of their main tools, but in the end, it all lies with the membership and how you vote. They cannot coerce you into voting yes, but they can and do use your ignorance to their advantage simply to conclude the mediation.
Either this offer is adequate, or it's inadequate in relations to your peers. Either you're discount pilots or you're not. That's how the vote should go.
#26
Line Holder
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,451
Likes: 24
From: Airplanes
Agreed. If they didn't want it and plan to use it they wouldn't have bargained for it. NK reserve life is going to suuuuuuuuuucccck.
#27
Line Holder
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,451
Likes: 24
From: Airplanes
You go back and start with the failed TA as a basis and go up from there.
No. You vote this down and you either fire or redirect your NC to renegotiate a new TA.
The NMB's job is to "close the deal." They couldn't care less if it's fair or not. They want a deal put out for a vote and hopefully closed. That's how they measure success, period, end of story. A deal being voted down brings them back and they want this deal done. Your most recent precedents of what happens after TA gets shot down are Delta and Southwest. I'm at Southwest. We essentially started over with a new NC, and new leadership and had a new and FAR superior TA about 9 months later. You couldn't even compare the two TA's, the first one was indeed THAT bad.
The mediators are allowed to lie and misdirect "in the interest of spurring the negotiations." That's why they use fear, uncertainty and doubt as one of their main tools, but in the end, it all lies with the membership and how you vote. They cannot coerce you into voting yes, but they can and do use your ignorance to their advantage simply to conclude the mediation.
Either this offer is adequate, or it's inadequate in relations to your peers. Either you're discount pilots or you're not. That's how the vote should go.
No. You vote this down and you either fire or redirect your NC to renegotiate a new TA.
The NMB's job is to "close the deal." They couldn't care less if it's fair or not. They want a deal put out for a vote and hopefully closed. That's how they measure success, period, end of story. A deal being voted down brings them back and they want this deal done. Your most recent precedents of what happens after TA gets shot down are Delta and Southwest. I'm at Southwest. We essentially started over with a new NC, and new leadership and had a new and FAR superior TA about 9 months later. You couldn't even compare the two TA's, the first one was indeed THAT bad.
The mediators are allowed to lie and misdirect "in the interest of spurring the negotiations." That's why they use fear, uncertainty and doubt as one of their main tools, but in the end, it all lies with the membership and how you vote. They cannot coerce you into voting yes, but they can and do use your ignorance to their advantage simply to conclude the mediation.
Either this offer is adequate, or it's inadequate in relations to your peers. Either you're discount pilots or you're not. That's how the vote should go.
#28
Gets Weekend Reserve
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,276
Likes: 273
From: B737CA
There's already been quite a few... I just hope those that are coming over aren't the weak sister yessies. We already have plenty of our own...
#29
Banned
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
You go back and start with the failed TA as a basis and go up from there.
No. You vote this down and you either fire or redirect your NC to renegotiate a new TA.
The NMB's job is to "close the deal." They couldn't care less if it's fair or not. They want a deal put out for a vote and hopefully closed. That's how they measure success, period, end of story. A deal being voted down brings them back and they want this deal done. Your most recent precedents of what happens after TA gets shot down are Delta and Southwest. I'm at Southwest. We essentially started over with a new NC, and new leadership and had a new and FAR superior TA about 9 months later. You couldn't even compare the two TA's, the first one was indeed THAT bad.
The mediators are allowed to lie and misdirect "in the interest of spurring the negotiations." That's why they use fear, uncertainty and doubt as one of their main tools, but in the end, it all lies with the membership and how you vote. They cannot coerce you into voting yes, but they can and do use your ignorance to their advantage simply to conclude the mediation.
Either this offer is adequate, or it's inadequate in relations to your peers. Either you're discount pilots or you're not. That's how the vote should go.
No. You vote this down and you either fire or redirect your NC to renegotiate a new TA.
The NMB's job is to "close the deal." They couldn't care less if it's fair or not. They want a deal put out for a vote and hopefully closed. That's how they measure success, period, end of story. A deal being voted down brings them back and they want this deal done. Your most recent precedents of what happens after TA gets shot down are Delta and Southwest. I'm at Southwest. We essentially started over with a new NC, and new leadership and had a new and FAR superior TA about 9 months later. You couldn't even compare the two TA's, the first one was indeed THAT bad.
The mediators are allowed to lie and misdirect "in the interest of spurring the negotiations." That's why they use fear, uncertainty and doubt as one of their main tools, but in the end, it all lies with the membership and how you vote. They cannot coerce you into voting yes, but they can and do use your ignorance to their advantage simply to conclude the mediation.
Either this offer is adequate, or it's inadequate in relations to your peers. Either you're discount pilots or you're not. That's how the vote should go.
Finally, an educated person with an educated post! Cheers!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
#30
Line Holder
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Lets see, 40% turnout for LEC elections, 50 guys showing up to a picket, guys calling up on All Calls asking questions that clearly show they have absolutely no fng clue whats going on, multiple multiple guys/gals CONSTANTLY violating the CBA to enrich themselves and you wonder where the unity is? C’mon.......you’re smarter than that.
My thoughts exactly! The most vocal no voters never even made the attempt to attend a picketing event, some even thought it was stupid to show some unity by wearing one of the lanyards. Yet they’re appalled that this TA was the best the NC could come up with. I’m not willing to vote this down in hopes that a better TA will surface in a few months, when the majority of this pilot group has shown lack of unity to stand behind the NC and MEC during this process.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



