Search

Notices

Spirit of NKS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-15-2015 | 09:12 AM
  #11381  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
From: Airbus Left
Default

Originally Posted by Android
Too bad De grenier and Hershon now labeled themselves as the minority in this issue. Now anything they say can be construed as divisiveness, and against the best interest of the pilots.
I'm sorry to be blunt, but this is about the dumbest thing I ever read on this board, Android. How clueless can you get?
Based on all your post here, you clearly have some hatred and hostility issues to work out for yourself.
For the rest of us, we support our reps no matter how they voted and we move on in a professional matter, communicating with our reps about how we want them to proceed. However, all of them will have their feet to the fire, explaining how this recall action was necessary at this time.
I am sure they have a rational explanation beyond what we have seen so far. But if they acted out of the sort of anger, hatred, vengeance that you display in your post, they won't last long.
Old 04-15-2015 | 09:30 AM
  #11382  
Keizer Soze's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
Default

What about the Open Time Resolution? Will that be addressed at a later meeting?
Old 04-15-2015 | 09:40 AM
  #11383  
Plane Ramrod's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,577
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by NewA320Driver
What I learned on Tuesday at the MEC meeting:

Article 8 (Section 8?) proceedings to remove from office against Jim Ackerman (the new MEC Chairmen) for attempting to have Doug Poletti disciplined by taking the private conversations between him and a Doug to Spirit HR and the Chief Pilot's office (Chris Russing). How can we trust this guy who turned a pilot over to management?
Anything that stuffs DP back under the rock he came from is a net plus for the pilot group. Do you have any idea how many pilots have been DP'd over the years? The system worked, he had his day in court so to speak as it looks like that motion failed.


Originally Posted by NewA320Driver
Jason Leonard has been taping all phone conversations with members. Jesus, is that even legal?
I guess we know now why he would rather have 300 phone calls instead of sending out 1 email.

Originally Posted by NewA320Driver
The negotiating committee was consulted and specifically recommended against this course of action and supported the Council 18 rep position that the switch should be made at the next election cycle when Chris and Paul indicated they would not seek re-election.
They needed to cut out the cancer now, it already spread to the NC. If I wanted the NC's opinion on MEC governance, I'd elect them as status reps. Beside that, why would you want to stay in a job where 2/3 of your bosses don't want you there? Think about that one.

Originally Posted by NewA320Driver
No other committee chairmen were consulted.
At what company does the management consult the employees on replacing upper management positions?

Originally Posted by NewA320Driver
The debate over the recall was moved to a closed session on a motion by Jim Ackerman and a party line vote by the status reps.
Party line? Both of the 77 status reps were former MEC darlings when they were elected.

*******************************
Begin editorial comments stated as facts
*******************************
Originally Posted by NewA320Driver
This denied Chris and Paul the opportunity to defend against the accusations in front of the membership. Subsequently, the claims went un-substantiated since they were no longer in office.

They were recalled over not running meetings the right way and hurt feelings. The best interests of the pilot group were not considered.

Widespread belief that this will damage the negotiating committee in their effort to get us a contract. Bendo dancing a jig.

It appears that all of the pilots they had lined up to take the vice-chairmen and secretary-treasurer positions have declined the offer.

Didn't go on Wednesday.
Old 04-15-2015 | 09:52 AM
  #11384  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Balder
I am sure they have a rational explanation beyond what we have seen so far. But if they acted out of the sort of anger, hatred, vengeance that you display in your post, they won't last long.
Balder

I will be the first to say that recalls are not always the smartest thing to do , especially given our current position.

With that being said, I completely believe that this was the right move for us and for the company. The guys running the MEC were mostly topped out and making some killer money doing the MEC thing. They had no real reason to push for the best contract possible because they are already living a pretty nice life. I'm not saying that is how they thought but their actions seemed to say otherwise, and it could have effected the out come of section 6 significantly.

Additionally, Chris needed a reality check, his actions and words to me personally did not signify him as a leader. Not knowing him on a personal day to day basis its hard to judge him in whole but I strongly believe it was his time to go. If for nothing else we needed some new blood and new ideas.

I feel James is the right man for the job because he has the burning desire to lead and get us on track to be well paid. I think he will get some of our apathetic pilots to get on board to get the best possible contract. We have so many guys here that are more than happy being the lowest paid Airbus pilots, it maddening see our group so divided over what we should or should not be getting paid.

Please give this guy a chance to bring us together and kick some ass!

Cheers
Old 04-15-2015 | 10:43 AM
  #11385  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 657
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Hugedouche
Balder


I feel James is the right man for the job because he has the burning desire to lead and get us on track to be well paid. I think he will get some of our apathetic pilots to get on board to get the best possible contract. We have so many guys here that are more than happy being the lowest paid Airbus pilots, it maddening see our group so divided over what we should or should not be getting paid.

Please give this guy a chance to bring us together and kick some ass!

Cheers
I give a new guy a chance but I want to me more than well paid we can have the highest pay in the industry but it doesn't mean anything if our work rules and health ins costs are crap.
Old 04-15-2015 | 10:54 AM
  #11386  
New Hire
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Default

I just got a text that said they tabled the resolution. Whatever that means...
Old 04-15-2015 | 11:02 AM
  #11387  
Cruise's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,065
Likes: 0
From: Switch, Lever & Light Specialist
Default

Originally Posted by NewA320Driver
I just got a text that said they tabled the resolution. Whatever that means...
Means it's been delayed until the next MEC meeting.
Old 04-15-2015 | 11:07 AM
  #11388  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by flyingpuma1
I give a new guy a chance but I want to me more than well paid we can have the highest pay in the industry but it doesn't mean anything if our work rules and health ins costs are crap.
agreed.......
Old 04-15-2015 | 12:32 PM
  #11389  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
From: A320 Left
Default

Originally Posted by Jett i son
I think this change is positive, but too close to call yet.
This will show in the attitude of the NC in the coming months.
I prefer not to comment on the character of our reps, but rather on what they accomplish.
Did the recently recalled MEC officers support a negotiating plan which needed help?
The new MEC may have a more optimistic/aggressive view of what/how we should be negotiating.
We can do much better than focusing on +30% pay and keeping most rules!
What good does a quick signing do, if what we sign is a work in progress?
Anyone think we will do better in 5 years?
Job protection, retirement, must be addressed, before too late.

IF NOT NOW WHEN?
I'm beginning to understand that Spirit union pilots do things differently. But what new MEC are you talking about?

A careful read of the union emails from yesterday says that the MEC removed its Chairman and replaced him with another.

Do we at Spirit give the leadership role to our MEC Chairman? We didnt do it that way at brand X.

Ditto to the IF NOT NOW, WHEN?
Old 04-15-2015 | 08:58 PM
  #11390  
Jett i son's Avatar
escaped
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by GeauxPro
I'm beginning to understand that Spirit union pilots do things differently. But what new MEC are you talking about?

A careful read of the union emails from yesterday says that the MEC removed its Chairman and replaced him with another.

Do we at Spirit give the leadership role to our MEC Chairman? We didnt do it that way at brand X.

Ditto to the IF NOT NOW, WHEN?
Three MEC officers have stepped down, two were recalled and one resigned. I used the adjective "new" to describe the changes in the MEC.
We can call it the "revised" MEC, it still makes no difference if this "new" MEC does not change our negotiating strategy.
This may have to come from the LEC level.
We need some urgency and spunk from our representatives going into the negotiations, not feeling comfortable with the status quo.

IF NOT NOW, WHEN?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cs757200
Major
11
08-27-2011 11:55 AM
Splanky
Major
7
05-16-2009 06:13 PM
shiftwork
Major
440
03-18-2009 05:05 PM
DWN3GRN
Major
16
09-02-2008 04:11 PM
A320Flyer
Major
5
09-02-2008 04:05 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices