Notices

Spirit of NKS

Old 01-23-2015 | 02:00 PM
  #9911  
Boost is Life
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
From: In the Garage
Default

Finally got a new login after god knows how many years....


Can I play?

HIT ME!
Old 01-23-2015 | 02:20 PM
  #9912  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 758
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by JasonLeonard
Finally got a new login after god knows how many years....


Can I play?

HIT ME!
OK, separate the two issues.

Give the DL LOA it's own number, get five hours per day; and rewrite the Protection LOA to where the pilot gets the benefit of the doubt and I'll vote for them.
Old 01-23-2015 | 03:10 PM
  #9913  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Default

Email from the union states that the EFB protection language is industry standard. Anybody actually compared the protection language to other contracts? I was initially a little concerned about the protection language, but if it is truly industry standard than hopefully it shouldn't be an issue.
Old 01-23-2015 | 04:42 PM
  #9914  
BrasiliaDriver's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
From: Airbus FO
Default

Originally Posted by Sailor
I'm hung up on the pay vs the enormous savings that this iPad and DL will give to the company. I just don't see why we don't get the full 18hr paid.
This is where I am coming from. This is supposed to be a negotiation. Why should we accept the first deal brought forward? We know that the company will probably never pay all 18 hours, but they may meet us somewhere in the middle and we may be successful in further defining Fair Market Value so that it is not so ambiguous and one sided. If that means we have to reject the LOA in order to bring it back to the table then that is what we should do.

NO until there is some give and take. That is a negotiation. Not, "accept this or else". That is an ultimatum.
Old 01-23-2015 | 05:09 PM
  #9915  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,603
Likes: 0
Default

Feel free to vote no as I will be doing but in theory a TA is not a first offer, it represents a back and forth negotiation between the company and the negotiating committee which represents you. To look at all TAs as a "first offer" would be misguided.
Old 01-23-2015 | 05:13 PM
  #9916  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,603
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by WelcomeToBen
Email from the union states that the EFB protection language is industry standard. Anybody actually compared the protection language to other contracts? I was initially a little concerned about the protection language, but if it is truly industry standard than hopefully it shouldn't be an issue.
I haven't seen their exact language but after reading ours my united friends tell me that our efb language is much stronger. If it were presented alone I would vote yes for it no problem. My no vote is 100% about being on a min day off line and losing two more days off to do training on my own time. That is 100% concessionary and 100% why I'm voting no. Period.
Old 01-23-2015 | 05:23 PM
  #9917  
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by BrasiliaDriver
Quote:





Originally Posted by Sailor


I'm hung up on the pay vs the enormous savings that this iPad and DL will give to the company. I just don't see why we don't get the full 18hr paid.




This is where I am coming from. This is supposed to be a negotiation. Why should we accept the first deal brought forward? We know that the company will probably never pay all 18 hours, but they may meet us somewhere in the middle and we may be successful in further defining Fair Market Value so that it is not so ambiguous and one sided. If that means we have to reject the LOA in order to bring it back to the table then that is what we should do.

NO until there is some give and take. That is a negotiation. Not, "accept this or else". That is an ultimatum.
I don't think they "ALPA" is shoving this down our throats, hence the read, ask, think, vote.....my problem still is the major company gain vs the extra 2 hrs of pay....not enough to use my off time at home or my Required Rest Time on Overnights.
Old 01-23-2015 | 06:50 PM
  #9918  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,603
Likes: 0
Default

Anyone know when our w2 should be on link? I know they have to the end of the month but I've heard some have theirs already
Old 01-23-2015 | 07:01 PM
  #9919  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
From: A320 captain
Default

Originally Posted by putzin
I would vote "no" on Alaska rates as they would leave us too far behind. Don't settle, we're worth more.

And....still voting "no" on the current TA. We shouldn't be doing scare tactics.
I agree about Alaska.
Regarding the LOA I just don't see scare tactics or threat being employed here. There is nothing substantial to win...
It's 2015 now and we need our efforts directed where needed for real and substantial gains.
Old 01-23-2015 | 07:03 PM
  #9920  
ShopVac's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
From: A320
Default

Any ideas how this might effect PT's and PC's?

If my pad goes bad, do I have to buy a new one from the co., or will they just trade me for a spare?

If a pad gets lost, will they offer loaners til it is found?

What do other airlines do in the situations?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cs757200
Major
11
08-27-2011 11:55 AM
Splanky
Major
7
05-16-2009 06:13 PM
shiftwork
Major
440
03-18-2009 05:05 PM
DWN3GRN
Major
16
09-02-2008 04:11 PM
A320Flyer
Major
5
09-02-2008 04:05 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices