Spirit of NKS
#9981
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,385
Likes: 0
From: Airplane
The point is that it is our responsibility to show the breakage was not 'willful misconduct' since they have the power of payroll deduction. You know who you are dealing with right?
If its stolen in the middle of a trip are you going to wait 5 hrs for Boston PD to report a 'stolen iPad'? Really dude? Who takes the delay?
If they do charge you do you really think they apply depreciation to the value? yea right!
And yes...most iPads come with a sim card for data. Yes, it costs more for that version but the corporate data plans are dirt cheap. The other airlines use them.
Try doing an update on your screaming home WIFI when you are in the middle of a 6 day commute/trip and a fed is going along for the ride. Get real.
If its stolen in the middle of a trip are you going to wait 5 hrs for Boston PD to report a 'stolen iPad'? Really dude? Who takes the delay?
If they do charge you do you really think they apply depreciation to the value? yea right!
And yes...most iPads come with a sim card for data. Yes, it costs more for that version but the corporate data plans are dirt cheap. The other airlines use them.
Try doing an update on your screaming home WIFI when you are in the middle of a 6 day commute/trip and a fed is going along for the ride. Get real.
I misunderstood your point about the data card, you meant an iPad with 4G connectivity. Again, I don't see a problem. But, the EFB manual clearly states updates need not be accomplished once a pairing is started. But, I've yet to be in a hotel that didn't have wifi, even a slow connection an update really doesn't take long.
#9982
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,385
Likes: 0
From: Airplane
My point is that no management gives anything away for free and unless something is spelled out explicitly in contractual language the company will always interpret in their favor while you grieve it and wait months for an arbitration date. I'm not saying they will make you buy a broken iPad at retail price when they paid wholesale but if they can they probably will and there is nothing in the language to prevent it.
That said the iPad language is satisfactory to me and I would vote in favor if it were alone. The training is my huge issue and the fact that the group is not understanding the staffing implications is mind blowing. Trip protection and dhd pay is going to be small potatoes when they don't upgrade. Which will cost them more?
That said the iPad language is satisfactory to me and I would vote in favor if it were alone. The training is my huge issue and the fact that the group is not understanding the staffing implications is mind blowing. Trip protection and dhd pay is going to be small potatoes when they don't upgrade. Which will cost them more?
I had always seen efficiency as a plus, a plus to increased growth and increased staffing. And, I agree with you the DH and trip protection is a sidebar in this.
But, you've given me a pause and a leaning towards No.
#9983
144 aircraft by 2021, say 2500 pilots. 2 days of DL not on duty vs 2 days of DL in a crew room, on duty, is 5000 days a year of lost productivity from your workforce where we are not moving planes and someone needs to move those planes.
Say the average pilot works 180 days of duty a year 5000/180= 28 pilots a year. So my math shows they need 28 pilots less a year just on savings for us doing it off the clock. This is a minimum, doesn't account for any conflict drops of any kind.
28 pilots will be 1st year FO pay pilots. Even on guarantee thats a million a year in savings just on wages, not counting healthcare, social security taxes, training, etc.
#9984
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,603
Likes: 0
The number is probably lower because they can make those not on min days off train on their days off in domicile but cannot do that to those already on min days off. But the logic is sound and my exact point.
#9985
I don't temember... Do we have the opportunity to add trips with IOT and DOT prior to them placing the training on our schedule?
#9986
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,603
Likes: 0
No. Training adjustments come when the lines are final prior to any open time
#9987
I dont know why so many miss the simple basic facts, and these are facts...
1)Conflict training bidding as we know it is gone, bye bye. Sucks but the company can end it and they will.
2)Ipads are coming, regardless. This LOA has nothing to do with ipads coming and jepp charts going away. Ipads in the cockpits save the company money and its coming. People need to stop thinking "But I want my ipad." The reason why they wanted this LOA to include DL and protocol for the Ipad is because they know we are stupid enough to care about porn protection on our ipads.
3) Protections in the LOA are barely better than our current CBA, it allows guys to now surf porn on their ipad with more "protections." LOA still allows them to charge us if they want.
4)This LOA will reduce staffing.
5) This LOA saves the company a ton of money because of (see number 4)
6)I dont care if they make me come into base to do my DL, its 2 days a year and 2 days isnt going to give me nightmares.
My main concern is we vote this down, management makes us come in, and guys complain so much we have to now negotiate in Section 6 to essentially get this LOA back for our contract. So if you vote no, be prepared to do your DL in base. It may not happen, but dont vote "no" and then cry "but I dont want to do it in base" if they implement that. Im not giving up anything come Section 6 time to GET BACK 5 hours of pay per day for DL and being able to do it at home.
Like I said, ill come in if they make me, maybe even reanalyze my fatigue and readiness for flight if I have to spend days off in a crew room for hours and hours.
#9989
Management will take the lowest cost route to their goal.
Do you think they offered this LOA because they love you?
This LOA is offered because it is a win for them. Period, end of story! *
Where's the win for us?
IT IS NOT THE GROUPS PROBLEM THAT THE MEC SENT OUT A POORLY CONSIDERED LOA!
*everyone here is happy that Spirit is profitable, no one is jealous. We just dont want their gain to come at our expense.
Do you think they offered this LOA because they love you?
This LOA is offered because it is a win for them. Period, end of story! *
Where's the win for us?
IT IS NOT THE GROUPS PROBLEM THAT THE MEC SENT OUT A POORLY CONSIDERED LOA!
*everyone here is happy that Spirit is profitable, no one is jealous. We just dont want their gain to come at our expense.
The point is out priorities as pilots are different, and we need to consider how it affects us as a pilot group before we start getting all bent out of shape about how much money they are saving.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



