Search

Notices

UPA23 page is up

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-16-2023 | 07:23 AM
  #91  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 819
Likes: 2
From: 756 left
Default

Originally Posted by ugleeual
This will pass in the high 80s… hopefully they get the TA written and out soon so it can start in September… work rules alone will benefit most if not all pilots.
October. It'll probably be a little less than 80s. Implementation schedule will be very important. Many of the provisions you see probably won't go into effect on OCT 1. The final language has to be tight on the implementation schedule.
Reply
Old 07-16-2023 | 07:24 AM
  #92  
khergan's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 650
Likes: 172
Default

Originally Posted by hummingbear
First off, yes I’m gonna say it. Pay only exceeds inflation if you include our LOA 5%, which means we’re eating that raise. If we hadn’t signed that LOA, we absolutely would be getting 20% DOS to match DAL instead of roughly 15%. They said they wouldn’t do that & they did. There are a lot of places to lay blame for that- including upon ourselves for making that lousy deal in the first place. In the future, I hope we’ll take a savvier approach to “scratching the company’s back first”. We stick to the contract, & don’t trust them to follow the intent of a hastily thrown together side deal.

Having said that, my initial impression is mostly positive. Whether you are a yes or a no, there’s no way you could argue this doesn’t objectively blow TUMI out of the water- even considering what we lost to time- and the glaring giveback of the namesake TUMI bag. I hope we all take the lesson that renegotiating a bad deal absolutely can be worth the time it costs.

I think the RSV section particularly (as I’m reading it) is very well designed. Lots of choice between QOL/pay, & a decent add pay structure to sell undesirable assignments rather than force them. At 84 hours plus additional add pay opportunities, VEC looks like a pretty good deal for in-base RSVs. (The mid-block sick call provision for RSVs is the one item I saw in the entire contract that seems “concessionary”- don’t believe we have that presently.) 3 hr FSB will go senior among in-base guys. Once people start to understand the ways to make $$$ on RSV, I think it will go not senior per se, but higher up the bidding ladder than it is presently.

Bridge to LTD is huge, & we’ve been demanding DAL profit sharing for ages.

New trip construction limits are generally good. I like the 2.5 day off & limits on ANF. I’m particularly curious to know more about the “RSV pool management” intended to improve lineholder trades/drops. Could be huge if effective, but the bullet points lack details.

12 months pos space will definitely help w/ upgrades, though I’m not thrilled about the street captain idea. UAL should be focused on tapping into their their resource of experienced pilots- not just getting butts in seats. (Yes, I understand some new hires are bringing a lot of great experience w/ them, but in today’s hiring environment, fewer than in times past.)

As has already been touched on, final language will be hugely important, so give them time to get it right, & make your decisions on the final product- not the billboard. (Though I’ll get in on the betting at 87% in favor- human behavior & all...)
Why would anyone already here care about street captain? At least to me, it's obviously targeting guys who grudgingly went to DL/AA but live in a UAL domicile and have the type/experience who would make the switch if they could pin CA.

Ultimately, anyone currently on the list can and will jump ahead of those guys, so I don't see why it's a threat. They will be on the bottom of reserve forever. Furthermore, because of the pipeline, anyone who was on the fence who wanted to bid CA can do so before any DEC type hires get activated.
Reply
Old 07-16-2023 | 07:32 AM
  #93  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 819
Likes: 2
From: 756 left
Default

Originally Posted by khergan
Why would anyone already here care about street captain? At least to me, it's obviously targeting guys who grudgingly went to DL/AA but live in a UAL domicile and have the type/experience who would make the switch if they could pin CA.

Ultimately, anyone currently on the list can and will jump ahead of those guys, so I don't see why it's a threat. They will be on the bottom of reserve forever. Furthermore, because of the pipeline, anyone who was on the fence who wanted to bid CA can do so before any DEC type hires get activated.

Because it can force some new hires into the left seat (after they get the required time) that don't want be there or don't feel they'd be comfortable there even after 100 hours of OE. Could be a CUSS issue. And the they'll be deep frozen on that fleet. No way out.
Reply
Old 07-16-2023 | 07:38 AM
  #94  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2021
Posts: 934
Likes: 22
Default

Originally Posted by 89Pistons
Because it can force some new hires into the left seat (after they get the required time) that don't want be there or don't feel they'd be comfortable there even after 100 hours of OE. Could be a CUSS issue. And the they'll be deep frozen on that fleet. No way out.
I think this has SWA pilots written all over it. Not sure what upgrade there is now but it’s probably 7-10 years. Highly experienced 737 pilots that can upgrade pretty fast would lure quite a few
Reply
Old 07-16-2023 | 07:38 AM
  #95  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 52
From: Head pillow fluffer, Assistant bed maker
Default

Originally Posted by KnightNight
What are we thinking timeline wise? 3 months to sign and then another month for retro checks? Trying to tell my Ferrari dealer when I can take delivery should this pass
a good Ferrari dealer will know and have the car delivered the day the retro check is deposited. (at least thats what mine is doing)
Reply
Old 07-16-2023 | 07:40 AM
  #96  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 52
From: Head pillow fluffer, Assistant bed maker
Default

Originally Posted by 89Pistons
Because it can force some new hires into the left seat (after they get the required time) that don't want be there or don't feel they'd be comfortable there even after 100 hours of OE. Could be a CUSS issue. And the they'll be deep frozen on that fleet. No way out.
how are they being forced into the left seat if they dont want to be there?
Reply
Old 07-16-2023 | 07:40 AM
  #97  
ugleeual's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,042
Likes: 47
From: 767/757 CA
Default

Originally Posted by 89Pistons
Because it can force some new hires into the left seat (after they get the required time) that don't want be there or don't feel they'd be comfortable there even after 100 hours of OE. Could be a CUSS issue. And the they'll be deep frozen on that fleet. No way out.
“forced”? Where did you read upgrades would be “forced”?
Reply
Old 07-16-2023 | 07:41 AM
  #98  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 599
Likes: 46
Default

Originally Posted by 89Pistons
Because it can force some new hires into the left seat (after they get the required time) that don't want be there or don't feel they'd be comfortable there even after 100 hours of OE. Could be a CUSS issue. And the they'll be deep frozen on that fleet. No way out.
Severely unlikely scenario easily dealt with on individual basis. Safety and Training committee can press the case to the company if a NH is ‘uncomfortable’ and feeling forced after 100 hours of OE.
Reply
Old 07-16-2023 | 07:45 AM
  #99  
hummingbear's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,449
Likes: 6
Default

Originally Posted by khergan
Why would anyone already here care about street captain? At least to me, it's obviously targeting guys who grudgingly went to DL/AA but live in a UAL domicile and have the type/experience who would make the switch if they could pin CA.

Ultimately, anyone currently on the list can and will jump ahead of those guys, so I don't see why it's a threat. They will be on the bottom of reserve forever. Furthermore, because of the pipeline, anyone who was on the fence who wanted to bid CA can do so before any DEC type hires get activated.
It’s not a threat. Just an attempt to draw from the bottom rather than the top. Drawing from the top would require greater incentives to get current FOs to bid NBCA- drawing from the bottom only requires making it available to more people. Essentially street captains takes pressure off the company to make the position more enticing to those higher on the seniority list.
Reply
Old 07-16-2023 | 07:47 AM
  #100  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 819
Likes: 2
From: 756 left
Default

Originally Posted by worstpilotever
how are they being forced into the left seat if they dont want to be there?
They'd be given as aircraft assignments in new hire class. It's not out of the realm of possibility that these positions would stop to the bottom of a class or two. That's where the "forced" could come from. With it carrying a deep freeze, check rides every 6 months, not being able to touch WB flying fr a long time, being stuck at the bottom of the category for years, these positions might not be as desirable as you'd think for a new hire. Could drop to the bottom. A new hire could pick NBFO in new hire class and still get to the left seat a year or so later without the things that go along with getting left seat bid on day one.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201736
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
MD11Simnerd
Cargo
0
09-12-2009 10:01 AM
Sir James
Hangar Talk
6
02-27-2006 04:44 PM
Delta102
Hangar Talk
0
11-18-2005 04:53 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices