UPA23 page is up
#91
Line Holder
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 819
Likes: 2
From: 756 left
October. It'll probably be a little less than 80s. Implementation schedule will be very important. Many of the provisions you see probably won't go into effect on OCT 1. The final language has to be tight on the implementation schedule.
#92
First off, yes I’m gonna say it. Pay only exceeds inflation if you include our LOA 5%, which means we’re eating that raise. If we hadn’t signed that LOA, we absolutely would be getting 20% DOS to match DAL instead of roughly 15%. They said they wouldn’t do that & they did. There are a lot of places to lay blame for that- including upon ourselves for making that lousy deal in the first place. In the future, I hope we’ll take a savvier approach to “scratching the company’s back first”. We stick to the contract, & don’t trust them to follow the intent of a hastily thrown together side deal.
Having said that, my initial impression is mostly positive. Whether you are a yes or a no, there’s no way you could argue this doesn’t objectively blow TUMI out of the water- even considering what we lost to time- and the glaring giveback of the namesake TUMI bag. I hope we all take the lesson that renegotiating a bad deal absolutely can be worth the time it costs.
I think the RSV section particularly (as I’m reading it) is very well designed. Lots of choice between QOL/pay, & a decent add pay structure to sell undesirable assignments rather than force them. At 84 hours plus additional add pay opportunities, VEC looks like a pretty good deal for in-base RSVs. (The mid-block sick call provision for RSVs is the one item I saw in the entire contract that seems “concessionary”- don’t believe we have that presently.) 3 hr FSB will go senior among in-base guys. Once people start to understand the ways to make $$$ on RSV, I think it will go not senior per se, but higher up the bidding ladder than it is presently.
Bridge to LTD is huge, & we’ve been demanding DAL profit sharing for ages.
New trip construction limits are generally good. I like the 2.5 day off & limits on ANF. I’m particularly curious to know more about the “RSV pool management” intended to improve lineholder trades/drops. Could be huge if effective, but the bullet points lack details.
12 months pos space will definitely help w/ upgrades, though I’m not thrilled about the street captain idea. UAL should be focused on tapping into their their resource of experienced pilots- not just getting butts in seats. (Yes, I understand some new hires are bringing a lot of great experience w/ them, but in today’s hiring environment, fewer than in times past.)
As has already been touched on, final language will be hugely important, so give them time to get it right, & make your decisions on the final product- not the billboard. (Though I’ll get in on the betting at 87% in favor- human behavior & all...)
Having said that, my initial impression is mostly positive. Whether you are a yes or a no, there’s no way you could argue this doesn’t objectively blow TUMI out of the water- even considering what we lost to time- and the glaring giveback of the namesake TUMI bag. I hope we all take the lesson that renegotiating a bad deal absolutely can be worth the time it costs.
I think the RSV section particularly (as I’m reading it) is very well designed. Lots of choice between QOL/pay, & a decent add pay structure to sell undesirable assignments rather than force them. At 84 hours plus additional add pay opportunities, VEC looks like a pretty good deal for in-base RSVs. (The mid-block sick call provision for RSVs is the one item I saw in the entire contract that seems “concessionary”- don’t believe we have that presently.) 3 hr FSB will go senior among in-base guys. Once people start to understand the ways to make $$$ on RSV, I think it will go not senior per se, but higher up the bidding ladder than it is presently.
Bridge to LTD is huge, & we’ve been demanding DAL profit sharing for ages.
New trip construction limits are generally good. I like the 2.5 day off & limits on ANF. I’m particularly curious to know more about the “RSV pool management” intended to improve lineholder trades/drops. Could be huge if effective, but the bullet points lack details.
12 months pos space will definitely help w/ upgrades, though I’m not thrilled about the street captain idea. UAL should be focused on tapping into their their resource of experienced pilots- not just getting butts in seats. (Yes, I understand some new hires are bringing a lot of great experience w/ them, but in today’s hiring environment, fewer than in times past.)
As has already been touched on, final language will be hugely important, so give them time to get it right, & make your decisions on the final product- not the billboard. (Though I’ll get in on the betting at 87% in favor- human behavior & all...)
Ultimately, anyone currently on the list can and will jump ahead of those guys, so I don't see why it's a threat. They will be on the bottom of reserve forever. Furthermore, because of the pipeline, anyone who was on the fence who wanted to bid CA can do so before any DEC type hires get activated.
#93
Line Holder
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 819
Likes: 2
From: 756 left
Why would anyone already here care about street captain? At least to me, it's obviously targeting guys who grudgingly went to DL/AA but live in a UAL domicile and have the type/experience who would make the switch if they could pin CA.
Ultimately, anyone currently on the list can and will jump ahead of those guys, so I don't see why it's a threat. They will be on the bottom of reserve forever. Furthermore, because of the pipeline, anyone who was on the fence who wanted to bid CA can do so before any DEC type hires get activated.
Ultimately, anyone currently on the list can and will jump ahead of those guys, so I don't see why it's a threat. They will be on the bottom of reserve forever. Furthermore, because of the pipeline, anyone who was on the fence who wanted to bid CA can do so before any DEC type hires get activated.
Because it can force some new hires into the left seat (after they get the required time) that don't want be there or don't feel they'd be comfortable there even after 100 hours of OE. Could be a CUSS issue. And the they'll be deep frozen on that fleet. No way out.
#94
Line Holder
Joined: Aug 2021
Posts: 934
Likes: 22
I think this has SWA pilots written all over it. Not sure what upgrade there is now but it’s probably 7-10 years. Highly experienced 737 pilots that can upgrade pretty fast would lure quite a few
#95
Line Holder
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 52
From: Head pillow fluffer, Assistant bed maker
a good Ferrari dealer will know and have the car delivered the day the retro check is deposited. (at least thats what mine is doing)
#96
Line Holder
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 52
From: Head pillow fluffer, Assistant bed maker
how are they being forced into the left seat if they dont want to be there?
#97
“forced”? Where did you read upgrades would be “forced”?
#98
Line Holder
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 599
Likes: 46
Severely unlikely scenario easily dealt with on individual basis. Safety and Training committee can press the case to the company if a NH is ‘uncomfortable’ and feeling forced after 100 hours of OE.
#99
Why would anyone already here care about street captain? At least to me, it's obviously targeting guys who grudgingly went to DL/AA but live in a UAL domicile and have the type/experience who would make the switch if they could pin CA.
Ultimately, anyone currently on the list can and will jump ahead of those guys, so I don't see why it's a threat. They will be on the bottom of reserve forever. Furthermore, because of the pipeline, anyone who was on the fence who wanted to bid CA can do so before any DEC type hires get activated.
Ultimately, anyone currently on the list can and will jump ahead of those guys, so I don't see why it's a threat. They will be on the bottom of reserve forever. Furthermore, because of the pipeline, anyone who was on the fence who wanted to bid CA can do so before any DEC type hires get activated.
#100
Line Holder
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 819
Likes: 2
From: 756 left
They'd be given as aircraft assignments in new hire class. It's not out of the realm of possibility that these positions would stop to the bottom of a class or two. That's where the "forced" could come from. With it carrying a deep freeze, check rides every 6 months, not being able to touch WB flying fr a long time, being stuck at the bottom of the category for years, these positions might not be as desirable as you'd think for a new hire. Could drop to the bottom. A new hire could pick NBFO in new hire class and still get to the left seat a year or so later without the things that go along with getting left seat bid on day one.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



