SK trip to Toulouse

Subscribe
10  16  17  18  19  20  21 
Page 20 of 21
Go to
03-10-2024 | 05:44 AM
  #191  
Quote: That is why I said pull out the drawings. The industry made the tools, fixtures, and jigs. Back then, no one had ever worked on them.

Design drawings gets you half there.
FAA standards have changed. That's why the MAX 7 and 10 remain uncertified. The chance you Woukd get a design that's been out of production for 20 years "grandfathered" under its original standards strike me as low - particularly for Boeing who isn't in anyone's good graces right now.

If you actually name it the 797, "low" becomes "no way in hell".
Reply 0
03-10-2024 | 06:53 AM
  #192  
Quote: That is why I said pull out the drawings. The industry made the tools, fixtures, and jigs. Back then, no one had ever worked on them.

Design drawings gets you half there.
The next 20%: is there an engine that meets the 2027 regs that's killing the 767F.
Reply 0
03-10-2024 | 08:24 AM
  #193  
We all love the 757 but this is dumb. Let's bring back the 1970 Caddy Coupe DeVille. By many measures it was one of the coolest land yachts to ever grace American roads and it's the size we need to get the job done. We'll just toss in a new engine and it's gonna be a moneymaker.
Reply 0
03-10-2024 | 09:48 AM
  #194  
Quote: We all love the 757 but this is dumb.
Boeing has boxed itself out of the smart choices.
Reply 0
03-10-2024 | 03:25 PM
  #195  
Quote: Boeing has boxed itself out of the smart choices.
Yep. Loss of credibility with FAA leads to loss of ability to self certify work leads to inefficiencies that drive up unit costs AND decrease production rate. None of those are really conducive to any sort of fast rebound from their problems.
Reply 0
03-10-2024 | 04:31 PM
  #196  
Quote: Yep. Loss of credibility with FAA leads to loss of ability to self certify work leads to inefficiencies that drive up unit costs AND decrease production rate. None of those are really conducive to any sort of fast rebound from their problems.

You know what’s funny?….. you know who else lost their credibility? (Hint hint) Yet they somehow keep on chugging.

So I think there’s still a chance for Boeing. I’m sure they’ll figure out how to staple together a 7?7 together and get it certified.
Reply 0
03-11-2024 | 01:44 PM
  #197  
The 757 design will have to be updated. But it is not "throw everything away."
Reply 0
03-12-2024 | 07:57 AM
  #198  
Quote: The 757 design will have to be updated. But it is not "throw everything away."
Here's why Boeing airplanes now suck and will continue to suck: .Gov pays more for bombs and missiles and satellites than the airlines pay for jets. All that matters to corporate America is the stock price, and they know where their bread is buttered.

Boeing needs to exit the commercial aircraft business. Let the 787, 777X, and 737-MAX be the last.
Reply 0
03-12-2024 | 09:18 AM
  #199  
Quote: Here's why Boeing airplanes now suck and will continue to suck: .Gov pays more for bombs and missiles and satellites than the airlines pay for jets. All that matters to corporate America is the stock price, and they know where their bread is buttered.

Boeing needs to exit the commercial aircraft business. Let the 787, 777X, and 737-MAX be the last.

Boeing is actually underwater on quite a few of its .gov contracts. They are losing money in that sector due to fixed-firm contracts and cost overruns. Boeing struggles to steer defense unit in another year of losses Reuters

Don't let the facts get in the way of your theories, though.
Reply 0
03-12-2024 | 11:19 AM
  #200  
Quote: Boeing is actually underwater on quite a few of its .gov contracts. They are losing money in that sector due to fixed-firm contracts and cost overruns. Boeing struggles to steer defense unit in another year of losses Reuters

Don't let the facts get in the way of your theories, though.
Well now they're caught using Dishsoap for lubricant on the door seals..

https://www.businessinsider.com/faa-...scL7ibtOKuJ5Rs
Reply 0
10  16  17  18  19  20  21 
Page 20 of 21
Go to