SK trip to Toulouse
#151
Add in the KC-46. Yeah, I know it isn't technically a commercial aircraft, but the purely civilian 767 airframe components have had their share of stupid problems themselves leading the USAF to stop acceptance twice for such mundane things as FOD left in closed spaces and fuel tanks.
#152
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2024
Posts: 892
Likes: 151
All the above points to the pain of getting planes from Airbus as a cost of doing business, pretty much for the whole industry not just United.
Short training courses between the 320/330/350 will be a nice but small cost savings.
Will the FAA/UPA allow the 330/350 to be run as a common fleet? Seems like Delta would be doing that.
Short training courses between the 320/330/350 will be a nice but small cost savings.
Will the FAA/UPA allow the 330/350 to be run as a common fleet? Seems like Delta would be doing that.
#153
All the above points to the pain of getting planes from Airbus as a cost of doing business, pretty much for the whole industry not just United.
Short training courses between the 320/330/350 will be a nice but small cost savings.
Will the FAA/UPA allow the 330/350 to be run as a common fleet? Seems like Delta would be doing that.
Short training courses between the 320/330/350 will be a nice but small cost savings.
Will the FAA/UPA allow the 330/350 to be run as a common fleet? Seems like Delta would be doing that.
As for the FAA, it's going to do what it's going to do.
And at this point, I think the FAA is going to be looking at ANYTHING Boeing with as much or more scrutiny as anything Airbus since they have been identified as having a broken organization in terms of quality control which has been ongoing for some time, leaving how many loose/missing bolts and other discrepancies in aircraft already flying and yet to be found?
https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/26/busin...ion/index.html
And since these issues occurred at Boeing on the FAA's watch, while they gave them considerable license to do their own quality assurance, that is now going to make it much more difficult for Boeing to get anything new certified. The FAA is going to cut them no slack whatsoever.
https://www.cnbc.com/2024/01/25/sout...-for-2024.html
#154
Line Holder
Joined: Feb 2022
Posts: 588
Likes: 105
From: 73FO
Add in the KC-46. Yeah, I know it isn't technically a commercial aircraft, but the purely civilian 767 airframe components have had their share of stupid problems themselves leading the USAF to stop acceptance twice for such mundane things as FOD left in closed spaces and fuel tanks.
#158
Line Holder
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Looks like the A/I fix could take up to 18 months, delaying virtually any progress on the MAX 10 certification for at least a year.
https://theaircurrent.com/aviation-s...ix-slow-going/
https://theaircurrent.com/aviation-s...ix-slow-going/
#159
Line Holder
Joined: Dec 2022
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Unsure about the validity of Flightglobal but...
https://www.flightglobal.com/fleets/...157212.article
https://www.flightglobal.com/fleets/...157212.article
#160
Line Holder
Joined: Mar 2023
Posts: 234
Likes: 23
From: Cramped 737 Left Seat
Unsure about the validity of Flightglobal but...
https://www.flightglobal.com/fleets/...157212.article
https://www.flightglobal.com/fleets/...157212.article
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



