S3A.....Again
#101
:-)
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Likes: 0
The issue comes from buying out revenue passengers, as Delta has a "never involuntary bump" policy.
#102
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 2,895
Likes: 87
Ha, you really said that. I've been commuter my life in the regionals (to NYC) and as a Delta Pilot (ATL, LAX and NYC). I pretty well understand how commuting works. Further, desptie what you said, it is your responsibility to be in position for the start of your trip. Its in the FOM. Your CP will tell you that a thousand times during your probationary meetings. That never goes away. They don't care where you live. All they care about is that you be there for the start of your trip. Simple. Up to you to figure that out. You can be a responsible adult, or play a childs game.
This sounds like a manning problem to me. Why doesn't/didn't EDV staff reserves properly? Trying to get by on a razors margin perhaps to save a few cost bleems? Who was running EDV at the time this went down?
Yes I distill this down to simple fact. EDV pilots don't work for DAL. Our retirees should ALWAYS enjoy a higher priority for non-rev over non-Delta employees when traveling on our aircraft. I think we can get it.
This sounds like a manning problem to me. Why doesn't/didn't EDV staff reserves properly? Trying to get by on a razors margin perhaps to save a few cost bleems? Who was running EDV at the time this went down?
Yes I distill this down to simple fact. EDV pilots don't work for DAL. Our retirees should ALWAYS enjoy a higher priority for non-rev over non-Delta employees when traveling on our aircraft. I think we can get it.
If the CP, in a meeting with me and my rep, ever said it was my job to predict the future loads and seamlessly weave my way to work, he would have been wrong. I show up to the airport, I gives it my shots, if the company chooses to pos space me afterwards and displace a couple revenue pax that's on the company. At the time it was 1000 bucks a pop and higher.
Delta, the company that ran EDV and Delta, decided to step on your contract and increase their margins. That wasn't something the union asked for, there was nothing signed. Delta did the data crunch like they always did, and figured out the cost to screw mainline's retirement privilege's were less than the cost to keep buying passenger tickets to NYC or cancelling flights where needed. This happened, they are the facts, and they are not in dispute.
You are trying to point to a want you have in the contract, something that used to be there, and that's good. What's bad is blaming any of this on EDV pilots who didn't ask for it. We wanted more money to either buy our tickets if we wanted (we wouldn't), make the missing legs not hurt so much because the rest of the legs were paid so much, make the legs worth more than the hotel room stay the night before, or SO much money people at said regional could live in NYC sans food stamps. That was our ask. We got shortcircuited by Delta. I don't blame delta pilots for that, I came to work for them. I blamed management. You have no issue with EDV pilots. You have an issue with a couple ex and current EDV pilots calling you out on factual mistakes that you made. Own it, like an adult, and stop being a child.
#103
To your first. So what? You commute in to make your trip. Period.
I commute to a NE base. It's a pain, especially after we throttled the flights as result of C-19 and most of our rotations there on my equipment are uncommutable on the front and back end. Sometimes I leave a day or 2 early to insure I am in position for the start of the trip. That is my responsibility to my employer. I do have a commuter clause to avail myself to should SHTF, but rarely do I require that option (think I have used it once in 4 years).
If you can't be responsible to be in place for the start of your trip, maybe time to go do something else. Kicking our retirees in the back is not how this is solved. You being disciplined and professional is. If its on DAL metal, they should have S3A. Nothing less.
To your second statement. It has nothing to do with pass priority. A vindictive comment on your part.
I commute to a NE base. It's a pain, especially after we throttled the flights as result of C-19 and most of our rotations there on my equipment are uncommutable on the front and back end. Sometimes I leave a day or 2 early to insure I am in position for the start of the trip. That is my responsibility to my employer. I do have a commuter clause to avail myself to should SHTF, but rarely do I require that option (think I have used it once in 4 years).
If you can't be responsible to be in place for the start of your trip, maybe time to go do something else. Kicking our retirees in the back is not how this is solved. You being disciplined and professional is. If its on DAL metal, they should have S3A. Nothing less.
To your second statement. It has nothing to do with pass priority. A vindictive comment on your part.
Again - DAL (your company and my parent company) got tired of paying for $3,000 tickets several times a day because the retirees (who no longer contribute to the bottom line) got on the 6am and DAL purchased tickets on the 8am.
You can call my comment vindictive if you want. If does not change the fact - this wouldn’t be an issue is the pilots hadn’t given up scope in the first place. You have two remedies. Waste capital on higher pass travel benefits to beat out S3A for retirees or fix section 1 of your PWA. I think section 1 solves more problems (how many hostages does DAL have?), but that’s your PWA, not mine.
#104
On Reserve
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 197
Likes: 1
From: ATL FO
So you are justifying changing a long standing Nonrev priority policy disadvantaging tens of thousands of DELTA EMPLOYEES just to save some $$$ and help Endeavor pilots get to work??? You need to rethink your position here. That is a terrible argument with little justification, especially if you're a Delta pilot!!!
#105
Banned
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 1,982
Likes: 0
From: 3+ hour sit in the ATL
EDV has, what, 2k pilots on their list? If you have a gripe about edv companions, management, and beneficiaries of edv PILOTS getting S3A, then okay, I can understand the gripe. But ****ing off an entire pilot group who is by all accounts, improving your bottom line and working their butts off to maintain mainline metrics just trying to get to and from work, doesn't seem worth it imo. No, they aren't mainline, but they are absolutely an important piece to the puzzle with their performance. I know how strong the god complex is down in dixieland but they(edv) do a pretty significant amount of lift for you guys and from my time there, seemed by all intents and purposes to be an extremely professional work group. Not sure how that small of a pilot group in the grand scheme of things can ruffle so many feathers, especially those who are no longer active or contributing to Delta.
Problem solved.
#106
Endeavor pilots work for DAL shareholders.
Retirees don’t work for DAL shareholders.
Cogf16 was hired at DAL with 700 hours, wouldn’t even meet the bare minimum requirements at endeavor today.
Perhaps you guys could practice some humility. You make the entire pilot group look like spoiled brats. If you didn’t want this you should have went to SWA or JetBlue.
#107
Banned
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 1,982
Likes: 0
From: 3+ hour sit in the ATL
I live in MSP and drive to work, I could care less about the commuter clause. But I’m telling you, the clause in the contract is the same Cadillac plan at 9E and just because you are St. Commuter and used it once in 4 years doesn’t mean the rest of the world is like you.
Again - DAL (your company and my parent company) got tired of paying for $3,000 tickets several times a day because the retirees (who no longer contribute to the bottom line) got on the 6am and DAL purchased tickets on the 8am.
You can call my comment vindictive if you want. If does not change the fact - this wouldn’t be an issue is the pilots hadn’t given up scope in the first place. You have two remedies. Waste capital on higher pass travel benefits to beat out S3A for retirees or fix section 1 of your PWA. I think section 1 solves more problems (how many hostages does DAL have?), but that’s your PWA, not mine.
Again - DAL (your company and my parent company) got tired of paying for $3,000 tickets several times a day because the retirees (who no longer contribute to the bottom line) got on the 6am and DAL purchased tickets on the 8am.
You can call my comment vindictive if you want. If does not change the fact - this wouldn’t be an issue is the pilots hadn’t given up scope in the first place. You have two remedies. Waste capital on higher pass travel benefits to beat out S3A for retirees or fix section 1 of your PWA. I think section 1 solves more problems (how many hostages does DAL have?), but that’s your PWA, not mine.
Heck we sold ASA to SW. ASA used to be wholly owned too.
The fact remains. Our retirees worked for Delta Air Lines. You do not.
This may not go anywhere. All Cog was asking was for us to take a look at it. I called my reps and asked them to see what they can do. Nothing may come of it, or it might get traction. We'll see.
#108
Banned
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 1,982
Likes: 0
From: 3+ hour sit in the ATL
As a pilot, you don’t own anything. You’re just an employee, working for the shareholders. No different than a gate agent or flight attendant.
Endeavor pilots work for DAL shareholders.
But hey are not delta employees. They are contractors. Should we give other contractors that are paid by Delta, like say the construction company working on the LGA gates, S3A too?
Retirees don’t work for DAL shareholders.
Neither do EDV employees
Cogf16 was hired at DAL with 700 hours, wouldn’t even meet the bare minimum requirements at endeavor today.
So what, it was good enough for that time wasn't it
Perhaps you guys could practice some humility. You make the entire pilot group look like spoiled brats. If you didn’t want this you should have went to SWA or JetBlue.
Endeavor pilots work for DAL shareholders.
But hey are not delta employees. They are contractors. Should we give other contractors that are paid by Delta, like say the construction company working on the LGA gates, S3A too?
Retirees don’t work for DAL shareholders.
Neither do EDV employees
Cogf16 was hired at DAL with 700 hours, wouldn’t even meet the bare minimum requirements at endeavor today.
So what, it was good enough for that time wasn't it
Perhaps you guys could practice some humility. You make the entire pilot group look like spoiled brats. If you didn’t want this you should have went to SWA or JetBlue.
#109
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 2,895
Likes: 87
Maybe we should just sell EDV to SW. Problem solved.
Heck we sold ASA to SW. ASA used to be wholly owned too.
The fact remains. Our retirees worked for Delta Air Lines. You do not.
This may not go anywhere. All Cog was asking was for us to take a look at it. I called my reps and asked them to see what they can do. Nothing may come of it, or it might get traction. We'll see.
Heck we sold ASA to SW. ASA used to be wholly owned too.
The fact remains. Our retirees worked for Delta Air Lines. You do not.
This may not go anywhere. All Cog was asking was for us to take a look at it. I called my reps and asked them to see what they can do. Nothing may come of it, or it might get traction. We'll see.
#110
Banned
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 1,982
Likes: 0
From: 3+ hour sit in the ATL
I've been commuting the whole time, to nyc, except for about ~4 years when I lived in a base. Our job is not to be there for the trip, our job is to show up for the commute, give ourselves two chances, it says so right in the FOM. If we don't make it, the NON DISIPLINARY effect is to start removing legs from our pattern (at EDV). It is not the pilots job to solve the staffing problem of the company, which was run by Delta at the time.
If the CP, in a meeting with me and my rep, ever said it was my job to predict the future loads and seamlessly weave my way to work, he would have been wrong. I show up to the airport, I gives it my shots, if the company chooses to pos space me afterwards and displace a couple revenue pax that's on the company. At the time it was 1000 bucks a pop and higher.
Delta, the company that ran EDV and Delta, decided to step on your contract and increase their margins. That wasn't something the union asked for, there was nothing signed. Delta did the data crunch like they always did, and figured out the cost to screw mainline's retirement privilege's were less than the cost to keep buying passenger tickets to NYC or cancelling flights where needed. This happened, they are the facts, and they are not in dispute.
You are trying to point to a want you have in the contract, something that used to be there, and that's good. What's bad is blaming any of this on EDV pilots who didn't ask for it. We wanted more money to either buy our tickets if we wanted (we wouldn't), make the missing legs not hurt so much because the rest of the legs were paid so much, make the legs worth more than the hotel room stay the night before, or SO much money people at said regional could live in NYC sans food stamps. That was our ask. We got shortcircuited by Delta. I don't blame delta pilots for that, I came to work for them. I blamed management. You have no issue with EDV pilots. You have an issue with a couple ex and current EDV pilots calling you out on factual mistakes that you made. Own it, like an adult, and stop being a child.
If the CP, in a meeting with me and my rep, ever said it was my job to predict the future loads and seamlessly weave my way to work, he would have been wrong. I show up to the airport, I gives it my shots, if the company chooses to pos space me afterwards and displace a couple revenue pax that's on the company. At the time it was 1000 bucks a pop and higher.
Delta, the company that ran EDV and Delta, decided to step on your contract and increase their margins. That wasn't something the union asked for, there was nothing signed. Delta did the data crunch like they always did, and figured out the cost to screw mainline's retirement privilege's were less than the cost to keep buying passenger tickets to NYC or cancelling flights where needed. This happened, they are the facts, and they are not in dispute.
You are trying to point to a want you have in the contract, something that used to be there, and that's good. What's bad is blaming any of this on EDV pilots who didn't ask for it. We wanted more money to either buy our tickets if we wanted (we wouldn't), make the missing legs not hurt so much because the rest of the legs were paid so much, make the legs worth more than the hotel room stay the night before, or SO much money people at said regional could live in NYC sans food stamps. That was our ask. We got shortcircuited by Delta. I don't blame delta pilots for that, I came to work for them. I blamed management. You have no issue with EDV pilots. You have an issue with a couple ex and current EDV pilots calling you out on factual mistakes that you made. Own it, like an adult, and stop being a child.
No one is blaming EDV pilots, where did we ever say that? What we did say was that them getting S3A for non-rev - to include sig others and dependents - over our retirees is wrong. Them getting S3A to get too work is fine. IMHO we should look at seeing what we can do as a union to rectify that. Maybe something comes of it, maybe not. All Cog is asking is we try. That is a fair request.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



