Search

Notices

Hormuz impacts

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-17-2026 | 07:02 AM
  #231  
Excargodog's Avatar
Perennial Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,261
Likes: 259
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy
Devils advocate, what about Iran’s right to defend their bit of real estate? Twice actually in the last 12 months.


We’ve watched Russia be a far bigger threat to the U.S. and Europe, and carrying a land-occupying war against an Ukraine for 3+ yrs now. Did anyone go and bomb Moscow? Anyone bomb Putin’s compound? No. Because Russia has nukes and ICBMs, and unlike Iran, they can actually hit us.


What lesson does our inaction on Russia and direct action on Iran teach? If Iran didnt have ambitions for nuclear weapons, they sure do now. I’d bet they spend every waking minute trying to develop a nuke going forward. Ayatollah and ruling like type parties are all about power. They don’t want to relinquish it and would not risk throwing the first nuke, only to face a mutually assured destruction.


2 state solution died with Rabin’s assassination. Best we can hope for peace in the Middle East is the same “peace” Pakistan and India found in 1998. Both declared nuclear capabilities and since then, no major wars. Long term peace in the ME is going to be a nuclear stale mate. The best option then will be not to play.
now you are getting philosophical here and I Don’t think you totally get the issue of radical Shia Islam. Iran has been aggressively funding terrorist groups all over the place from Iran for almost a half century.

https://mei.edu/publication/irans-re...as-apocalypse/

From their initial attack on the US embassy and holding US citizens hostage for 444 days to current funding of terrorist organizations throughout the Middle East and Africa they have been the aggressors.
They are not simple oil well workers who simply want to be left alone nor have they ever been.

So I’ll ask YOU a philosophical question:

If you could go back in time to say…1929 and had a chance to take out Hitler before the Reichstag fire - back when the Nazis only had 12 seats in the Reichstag - and you had a chance to take out Hitler and Goebbels, would you have done it? Shot them from a distance or run over them with a truck or whatever it took? I would have. Yeah, it would have been a cosmic roll of the dice, with no guarantees - the road not taken.

Because what did happen damn near couldn’t have been worse. WWII killed more than 70 million people, perhaps as many as 85 million - a not inconsiderable feat considering the technology and logistics of the era.
So why would I want some proven terrorist government of religious fanatics to develop ICBMs and nukes.
Old 03-17-2026 | 07:11 AM
  #232  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 2,920
Likes: 116
Default

Originally Posted by unblestdevotee
Point and question still stands. While I can appreciate the gravity of foreign policy I am not upset that dictator and authoritarian killers are being taken out. Even better that it creates an opportunity to interfere with another aggressor and even create a situation where they will fare better by helping us.

For the leverage and concessions it helps that china interest would be in keeping their oil supply from Iran unaffected. They can’t afford to just let it slide with their heavy shipping and manufacturing.
They dont have an answer because a lot of people dont like we just killed 3/4 of Chinas "four war" plan for the usa.

venezuela had a good roll of the dice, no notes, and i liked the timing was the day before a big Chinese meeting.
Iran has gone well so far, the empire has lost control of iraq and syria/lebanon, their proxies have their nuts chopped off, makes the future attacks on israeli less of a distraction.
Without iranian oil, china might be able to attack taiwan but i dont think theyll hold it or stop a counterattack. If China is forced to wait a couple years they might have enough of a age demo problem taiwan invasion becomes untenable.

Who knows if it will all work out, but at least we are knee capping our sworn enemies. If venezuela, cuba, and iran are all taken care of by the end of this year, a decade from now people will laugh at the thought of the usa doing any less.
Old 03-17-2026 | 07:17 AM
  #233  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2022
Posts: 2,278
Likes: 441
Default

Originally Posted by unblestdevotee
Point and question still stands. While I can appreciate the gravity of foreign policy I am not upset that dictator and authoritarian killers are being taken out. Even better that it creates an opportunity to interfere with another aggressor and even create a situation where they will fare better by helping us.

For the leverage and concessions it helps that china interest would be in keeping their oil supply from Iran unaffected. They can’t afford to just let it slide with their heavy shipping and manufacturing.
its about optics, geopolitical dynamics, the value of the dollar, and the slow erosion of “perceived” American invincibility. Whether we like it or not the long peace was enabled by the perception of American military might. Power loves a vacuum and when the world stops asking for us to help, or ask our opinion, we lose a spot at the table. When we lose our spot at the table we cannot shape events to fit our foreign policy in our best interests. Where that goes i have no idea. Do we have the right to be top dog dictating world vectors? Up for debate. What i do know is that if the world starts to see china as an equal, we will lose soft power. Maybe its inevitable.

everything i said is subjective except a few points clearly delineated
Old 03-17-2026 | 07:49 AM
  #234  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 16
Likes: 9
Default

Originally Posted by Hubcapped
its about optics, geopolitical dynamics, the value of the dollar, and the slow erosion of “perceived” American invincibility. Whether we like it or not the long peace was enabled by the perception of American military might. Power loves a vacuum and when the world stops asking for us to help, or ask our opinion, we lose a spot at the table. When we lose our spot at the table we cannot shape events to fit our foreign policy in our best interests. Where that goes i have no idea. Do we have the right to be top dog dictating world vectors? Up for debate. What i do know is that if the world starts to see china as an equal, we will lose soft power. Maybe its inevitable.

everything i said is subjective except a few points clearly delineated
I can get behind the big stick policy policy. I just don’t see how allowing help softens the idea of our power there. I mean we’ve been doing this whole event with kid gloves on so far. It seems to me that taking down the whole country why creating issues for two other aggressors while using a minuscule, by our stature, amount of resources.

Correct me if I’m wrong but I believe we have more money in the first month of Ukraine than what we’re putting into this fight.
Old 03-17-2026 | 08:24 AM
  #235  
Line Holder
Veteran: Navy
5 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 1,191
Likes: 340
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
now you are getting philosophical here and I Don’t think you totally get the issue of radical Shia Islam. Iran has been aggressively funding terrorist groups all over the place from Iran for almost a half century.

https://mei.edu/publication/irans-re...as-apocalypse/

From their initial attack on the US embassy and holding US citizens hostage for 444 days to current funding of terrorist organizations throughout the Middle East and Africa they have been the aggressors.
They are not simple oil well workers who simply want to be left alone nor have they ever been.

So I’ll ask YOU a philosophical question:

If you could go back in time to say…1929 and had a chance to take out Hitler before the Reichstag fire - back when the Nazis only had 12 seats in the Reichstag - and you had a chance to take out Hitler and Goebbels, would you have done it? Shot them from a distance or run over them with a truck or whatever it took? I would have. Yeah, it would have been a cosmic roll of the dice, with no guarantees - the road not taken.

Because what did happen damn near couldn’t have been worse. WWII killed more than 70 million people, perhaps as many as 85 million - a not inconsiderable feat considering the technology and logistics of the era.
So why would I want some proven terrorist government of religious fanatics to develop ICBMs and nukes.
You seem to forget that we started all this mess when the democratical leader of Iran wanted to nationalize their oil industry and ARAMCO and US oil companies pressured the US and British governments to intervene (Operation Ajax). That got us the unpopular Shah which led to the Islamic Revolution.

We're batting pretty poorly when we attempt regime change in the 20th and 21st centuries.

The vast majority of the Shia population in Iran does want to be left alone. Just because we're in bed with the Sunni leaders in the ME doesn't mean their the good guys.
Old 03-17-2026 | 08:30 AM
  #236  
Excargodog's Avatar
Perennial Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,261
Likes: 259
Default

Originally Posted by SideStickMonkey
You seem to forget that we started all this mess when the democratical leader of Iran wanted to nationalize their oil industry and ARAMCO and US oil companies pressured the US and British governments to intervene (Operation Ajax). That got us the unpopular Shah which led to the Islamic Revolution.

We're batting pretty poorly when we attempt regime change in the 20th and 21st centuries.

The vast majority of the Shia population in Iran does want to be left alone. Just because we're in bed with the Sunni leaders in the ME doesn't mean their the good guys.
Indeed not, but they aren’t the ones chanting “Death ro America.”
Old 03-17-2026 | 08:34 AM
  #237  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,547
Likes: 1,155
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
Indeed not, but they aren’t the ones chanting “Death ro America.”
If a country kept bombing me and my neighbors so their oligarchs could keep making money, I'd be in the streets chanting Death to that country too.
Old 03-17-2026 | 08:34 AM
  #238  
Line Holder
Veteran: Navy
5 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 1,191
Likes: 340
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
Indeed not, but they aren’t the ones chanting “Death ro America.”
I forget, remind me the nationality of the 9/11 hijackers
Old 03-17-2026 | 08:37 AM
  #239  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 16
Likes: 9
Default

Originally Posted by SideStickMonkey
I forget, remind me the nationality of the 9/11 hijackers
Riddle Rats?
Old 03-17-2026 | 08:39 AM
  #240  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,883
Likes: 198
Default

Originally Posted by SideStickMonkey
I forget, remind me the nationality of the 9/11 hijackers
Saudi, planning Saudi, Leadership Saudi, funding Saudi. We invaded Iraq, go figure!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Pilot1001
Pilot Health
60
04-06-2024 07:02 AM
preflight
Endeavor Air
175
10-19-2021 12:03 PM
preflight
Endeavor Air
53
01-26-2019 10:51 PM
FlyingJman
United
26
04-06-2016 03:26 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices